Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment

PurposeThe laparoscopic suturing task is a complex procedure that requires objective assessment of surgical skills. Analysis of laparoscopic suturing task components was performed to improve current objective assessment tools.MethodsTwelve subjects participated in this study as three groups of four surgeons (novices, intermediates and experts). A box-trainer and organic tissue were used to perform the experiment while tool movements were recorded with the augmented reality haptic system. All subjects were right-handed and developed a surgeon’s knot. The laparoscopic suturing procedure was decomposed into four subtasks. Different objective metrics were applied during tool-motion analysis (TMA). Statistical analysis was performed, and results from three groups were compared using the Jonckheere–Terpstra test, considering significant differences when P ≤ 0.05.ResultsSeveral first, second and fourth subtask metrics had significant differences between the three groups. Subtasks 1 and 2 had more significant differences in metrics than subtask 4. Almost all metrics showed superior task executions accomplished by experts (lower time, total path length and number of movements) compared with intermediates and novices.ConclusionThe most important subtasks during suture learning process are needle puncture and first knot. The TMA could be a useful objective assessment tool to discriminate surgical experience and could be used in the future to measure and certify surgical proficiency.

[1]  S. Botden,et al.  What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[3]  Hiroyuki Ishii,et al.  Towards understanding the suture/ligature skills during the training process using WKS-2RII , 2008, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[4]  Ara Darzi,et al.  The surgical efficiency score: a feasible, reliable, and valid method of skills assessment. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[5]  M. Broder,et al.  Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization Associated With Laparoscopic and Open Colectomy Using a Large National Database , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Adam Dubrowski,et al.  Simulation in laparoscopic surgery: a concurrent validity study for FLS , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  J. Sackier,et al.  A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills , 1998, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  Petros Faloutsos,et al.  Support vector machines improve the accuracy of evaluation for the performance of laparoscopic training tasks , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: Implications for training in laparoscopic surgery , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  Enrique J Gómez,et al.  Video-based assistance system for training in minimally invasive surgery , 2011, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[11]  Gerald M. Fried,et al.  FLS Assessment of Competency Using Simulated Laparoscopic Tasks , 2008, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[12]  A. Darzi,et al.  Assessing operative skill , 1999, BMJ.

[13]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: Didactic design and technical development , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[14]  D. Candinas,et al.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safe and cost effective , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[15]  A. Scherpbier,et al.  Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: Construct and concurrent validity , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[17]  A. L. Trejos,et al.  Toward construct validity for a novel sensorized instrument-based minimally invasive surgery simulation system , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  José B. Pagador,et al.  Augmented reality haptic (ARH): an approach of electromagnetic tracking in minimally invasive surgery , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[19]  David J. Sheskin,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 1997 .

[20]  C. Daniel Smith,et al.  Design and Development of a Surgical Skills Simulation Curriculum , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[21]  Henry C. Lin,et al.  Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[22]  A. Darzi,et al.  Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[23]  N. Seymour VR to OR: A Review of the Evidence that Virtual Reality Simulation Improves Operating Room Performance , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[24]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[25]  A. Darzi,et al.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[26]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Task versus Subtask Surgical Skill Evaluation of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2009, MICCAI.

[27]  José B. Pagador,et al.  Electronic device for endosurgical skills training (EDEST): study of reliability , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[28]  Jerzy W. Rozenblit,et al.  SURGICAL TRAINING AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT USING A MOTION TRACKING SYSTEM , 2006 .

[29]  R. Veldkamp,et al.  Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[30]  A. Supe,et al.  Effectiveness of box trainers in laparoscopic training , 2007, Journal of minimal access surgery.

[31]  K. Moorthy,et al.  The benfits of stereoscopic vision in robotic-assisted performance on bench models , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[32]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Retracting and seeking movements during laparoscopic goal-oriented movements. Is the shortest path length optimal? , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[33]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  The Red DRAGON: A Multi-Modality System for Simulation and Training in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2007, MMVR.