Unit Cohesion and Military Performance

1 Overview In the years immediately after World War II, several scholars argued, based on information collected from German and American soldiers, that unit cohesion is essential to military effectiveness. Their conclusions gained considerable influence within the military. As we discuss below, our understanding of the concept of cohesion and its relationship to military performance has evolved in the years since, but the importance of the general concept of cohesion remains widely appreciated in the military. There is little doubt that personal bonds can play an important role in combat motivation. Understanding the full meaning of the term cohesion, what influences it, how it relates to performance, and how changes in group composition affect it is central to understanding how the introduction of known gay men and lesbians into military units will impact military performance. In the debate preceding the 1993 enactment of legislation leading to the DADT policy, there was a difference of opinion among military social scientists as to the likely effects of lifting the ban. Some predicted that the presence of known gay personnel would significantly disrupt unit cohesion, while others disagreed. Accordingly, RAND's 1993 report included a review of the existing literature related to the nature of unit cohesion, its effects on military performance, and the ways in which the presence of known gay men and lesbians might affect cohesion and performance. This chapter provides an update on relevant research on these topics and discusses new topics raised in the literature since 1993. As in 1993, we focus on the cohesion-performance link because it is so central to the policy debate—indeed, it is specifically cited in the DADT legislation. But military doctrine has long recognized that unit readiness and performance are the products of an array of inputs, policies, processes, and intangible factors in addition to unit cohesion, including leadership, training, mission , equipment, and logistical support, as well as weather, terrain, and enemy char

[1]  Martin L. Martens,et al.  Sticking it All Together: A Critical Assessment of the Group Cohesion–Performance Literature , 2009 .

[2]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Fostering team effectiveness in organizations: toward an integrative theoretical framework. , 2007, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[3]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[4]  L. Sargent,et al.  Does Diversity Affect Group Efficacy? The Intervening Role of Cohesion and Task Interdependence , 2001 .

[5]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Gender Composition and Group Cohesion in U.S. Army Units: A Comparision across Five Studies , 1999 .

[6]  James Griffith,et al.  An Evaluation of Unit Replacement on Unit Cohesion and Individual Morale in the U. S. Army All-Volunteer Force , 1990 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  H. Tajfel Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[9]  Micha Popper,et al.  Leadership in military combat units and business organizations , 1996 .

[10]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[11]  Laura Hoch,et al.  Men Against Fire The Problem Of Battle Command , 2016 .

[12]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Cohesiveness and performance: Covariation and causality in an undersea environment , 1975 .

[13]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[14]  Elizabeth Kier Homosexuals in the U.S. Military: Open Integration and Combat Effectiveness , 1998, International Security.

[15]  A. Bandura Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy , 2000 .

[16]  W. Brogden Annual Review of Psychology , 1957 .

[17]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis , 2006 .

[18]  James J. Tritten,et al.  A charismatic dimension of military leadership , 1995 .

[19]  Guy L. Siebold,et al.  Development of the Combat Platoon Cohesion Questionnaire , 1988 .

[20]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[21]  William Darryl Henderson,et al.  Cohesion: The Human Element in Combat , 2002 .

[22]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[23]  Artemis Chang,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship , 2001 .

[24]  Stephen B. Knouse,et al.  Keeping "On Task": An Exploration of Task Cohesion In Diverse Military Teams, , 1998 .

[25]  D. Harrison,et al.  TIES, LEADERS, AND TIME IN TEAMS: STRONG INFERENCE ABOUT NETWORK STRUCTURE'S EFFECTS ON TEAM VIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[26]  Beth G. Chung-Herrera,et al.  Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going? , 2009 .

[27]  J. Griffith The Army's New Unit Personnel Replacement and Its Relationship to Unit Cohesion and Social Support , 1989 .

[28]  Joan L. Duda,et al.  Can High Group Cohesion Be Harmful? , 2009 .

[29]  Guy L. Siebold,et al.  The Relation Between Demographic Descriptors and Soldier-Perceived Cohesion and Motivation , 1999 .

[30]  Eyal Ben-Ari,et al.  Cohesion during Military Operations , 2005 .

[31]  J. Cameron,et al.  The Nature and Consequences of Group Cohesion in a Military Sample , 2007 .

[32]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[33]  Eliav Zakay,et al.  Perceived Combat Readiness as Collective Efficacy: Individual- and Group-Level Analysis , 2000 .

[34]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Minority Influence, Divergent Thinking and Detection of Correct Solutions , 1987 .

[35]  Guy L. Siebold,et al.  The Essence of Military Group Cohesion , 2007 .

[36]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  Robert J. MacCoun,et al.  Does Social Cohesion Determine Motivation in Combat? , 2006 .

[39]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Terror Management Theory of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews: Empirical Assessments and Conceptual Refinements , 1997 .

[41]  Leonard Wong The effects of cohesion on organizational performance: a test of two models , 1992 .

[42]  Daniel J. Beal,et al.  Conflict and Cooperation in Diverse Workgroups , 2009 .

[43]  Adrienne Y. Lee,et al.  Team Perceived Trustworthiness in a Complex Military Peacekeeping Simulation , 2010 .

[44]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[45]  S. Carless,et al.  The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams , 2000 .

[46]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[47]  Joan Harman,et al.  A Quantitative Integration of the Military Cohesion Literature , 1999 .

[48]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[49]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues , 2000 .

[50]  James Griffith,et al.  Multilevel Analysis of Cohesion's Relation to Stress, Well-Being, Identification, Disintegration, and Perceived Combat Readiness , 2002 .

[51]  B. Bass,et al.  Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[53]  Margaret C. Harrell,et al.  New Opportunities for Military Women Effects Upon Readiness, Cohesion, and Morale. , 1998 .

[54]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[55]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[56]  Sheila Simsarian Webber,et al.  Development of Cognitive and Affective Trust in Teams , 2008 .

[57]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Does Team Training Improve Team Performance? A Meta-Analysis , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[58]  Ronald J. Deluga The Relation Between Trust in the Supervisor and Subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 1995 .

[59]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[60]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[61]  Fred W. Peterson,et al.  Predicting Group Performance Using Cohesion and Social Network Density: A Comparative Analysis , 2007 .

[62]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[63]  W. Swann,et al.  Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  K. Dion Group cohesion: From "field of forces" to multidimensional construct. , 2000 .

[65]  A. Carrón,et al.  Team cohesion and team success in sport , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[66]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .

[67]  F. Tønnessen,et al.  The Relationship Between Group Cohesion, Group Norms, and Perceived Social Loafing in Soccer Teams , 2006 .

[68]  S. K. Horwitz,et al.  The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography , 2007 .

[69]  Leonard Wong,et al.  Why They Fight: Combat Motivation in the Iraq War , 2014 .

[70]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Affective Forecasting , 2005 .

[71]  B. Avolio,et al.  Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development and Performance: A Field Experiment , 2002 .

[72]  R. Stogdill Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness , 1972 .

[73]  G. Herek,et al.  Sexual orientation and mental health. , 2007, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[74]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[75]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The immunological effects of thought suppression. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[76]  David J. Whitney,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance , 2012 .

[77]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[78]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[79]  K. Dirks The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[80]  Monte D. Smith,et al.  Pre- to Middeployment Assessment of Unit Focused Stability Impact on Cohesion , 2006 .

[81]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  D. Weiss,et al.  Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[83]  J. Eid,et al.  Factors Influencing Small-Unit Cohesion in Norwegian Navy Officer Cadets , 2002 .

[84]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[85]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Coming Out in the Age of the Internet: Identity “Demarginalization” Through Virtual Group Participation , 1998 .

[86]  C. Nemeth Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[87]  David Jones,et al.  Know thyself! , 1992, Nature.

[88]  E. Salas,et al.  Team Performance and Training in Complex Environments , 1998 .

[89]  Jennifer M Talarico,et al.  A review of 40 years of research , 2018 .

[90]  H. S. Feild,et al.  The Relationship of Group Process Variables and Team Performance , 2002 .

[91]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver , 1993 .

[92]  Gary J. Schaub Unit Cohesion and the Impact of DADT , 2010 .

[93]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[94]  Douglas.V Johnson Odysseus in America: Combat Trauma and the Trials of Homecoming , 2003 .

[95]  J. H. van den Berg,et al.  Soldiers Under Threat: An Exploration of the Effect of Real Threat on Soldier's Perceptions, Attitudes and Morale , 2009 .

[96]  E. Suchman,et al.  The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. , 1949 .

[97]  Dennis K. Leedom,et al.  Improving Team Coordination: A Case for Behavior-Based Training , 1995 .

[98]  Leonard Wong,et al.  Military leadership: A context specific review $ , 2003 .

[99]  C. R. Evans,et al.  The Structure of Group Cohesion , 1995 .

[100]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Teamwork: emerging principles , 2000 .

[101]  John D. Winkler,et al.  sTABIlITy AND cohesIoN: how mUch Is NeeDeD? , 2009 .

[102]  Jeffrey D. Peterson The Effect of Personnel Stability on Organizational Performance: Do Battalions with Stable Command Groups Achieve Higher Training Proficiency at the National Training Center? , 2008 .

[103]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Anti-Norm and Pro-Norm Deviance in the Bank and on the Campus: Two Experiments on Subjective Group Dynamics , 2002 .

[104]  Laura L. Miller,et al.  Attitudes of Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans toward Gay and Lesbian Service Members , 2010 .