Combining loss and cost objectives in daily hydro-thermal economic scheduling

A formulation of optimal hydro-thermal power flow in electric power systems combining the minimum loss objective with the more conventional minimum feel cost objective is considered. The implementation is based on a Newton's iterative procedure, with special initial guess and sparsity-based matrix manipulations to obtain improved convergence properties. The strategies are developed using three standard test systems. The authors discuss the question of assigning an equivalent cost to the loss objective component and compare results obtained using two proposed mechanisms. The first is based on results of conventional dispatch using Kron's loss formula and the second uses the bus incremental costs involved in the optimal power flow solution. The effects of varying the relative weights assigned to each objective component on pertinent system variables such as active and reactive power generations as well as voltages are explored. >

[1]  M. E. El-Hawary,et al.  THE HYDRO-THERMAL OPTIMAL POWER FLOW PROBLEM IN RECTANGULAR COORDINATES , 1988 .

[2]  William F. Tinney,et al.  Optimal Power Flow Solutions , 1968 .

[3]  J. S. Heslin,et al.  A multiobjective production costing model for analyzing emissions dispatching and fuel switching (of power stations) , 1989 .

[4]  Mohamed E. El-Hawary Electric Power Systems: Design and Analysis , 1982 .

[5]  Seinosuke Narita,et al.  A Computational Algorithm for Real-Time Control of System Voltage and Reactive Power Part II - Algorithm of Optimization , 1971 .

[6]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[7]  Yasuo Tamura,et al.  Real Time Control of System Voltage and Reactive Power , 1969 .

[8]  M. Ramamoorty,et al.  Load scheduling of hydroelectric/thermal generating systems using nonlinear programming techniques , 1970 .

[9]  H. Happ,et al.  Quadratically Convergent Optimal Power Flow , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[10]  G. S. Christensen,et al.  Hydrothermal load flow using functional analysis , 1973 .

[11]  M. El-hawary,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Parameter Estimation Algorithms for Economic Operation of Power Systems , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[12]  M. E. El-Hawary,et al.  The Hydrothermal Optimal Load Flow, A Practical Formulation and Solution Techniques Using Newton's Approach , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  K. C. Mamandur,et al.  Optimal Control of Reactive Power flow for Improvements in Voltage Profiles and for Real Power Loss Minimization , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[14]  Adam Semlyen,et al.  Hydrothermal optimal power flow based on a combined linear and nonlinear programming methodology , 1989 .

[15]  Shih-Yung Tong,et al.  Minimizing Power Transmission Losses by Reactive-Volt-Ampere Control , 1963 .

[16]  Albert M. Sasson,et al.  Nonlinear Programming Solutions for Load-Flow, Minimum-Loss, and Economic Dispatching Problems , 1969 .

[17]  H. Sasaki,et al.  Multiobjective optimal generation dispatch based on probability security criteria , 1988 .

[18]  O. Alsac,et al.  Security analysis and optimization , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  R.R. Shoults,et al.  Reactive power control by least squares minimization , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.