Galaxy Classification Using Artificial Neural Networks

Applications of machine-automated reduction procedures and pattern recognition techniques are a key ingredient to the execution of large all-sky digital surveys. The development of objective machine techniques for object detection, measurement, and classification not only allow for a timely reduction of the data, but greatly add to the scientific worth of the final product by imposing a reduction process which is rigorously adhered to. Works by Slezak et ul.,' Heydon-Dumbleton et ~ l . , ~ Rhee,3 and Odewahn et aL4 discuss the use of automated techniques for rudimentary image analysis (i.e., star-galaxy separation), but the area of automated morphological classification of galaxies is in a relative state of infancy. Early investigations have yet to produce a system which can discern the subtle features attainable by experienced human classifiers when assigning a type in the revised Hubble classification system. Using high-quality photometric parameter sets from multiple spectral regions, along with sophisticated classification algorithms, it is only a matter of time before machine classified sets will match the repeatability of the human classifiers. In addition, such techniques will be applied in a more consistent manner to vastly larger data sets than have heretofore been attempted in human visual classification projects. Thonnat' has used a rule-based expert system to derive galaxy classifications from parameters obtained in the image segmentation of PDS density arrays measured on photographic Schmidt plates. Although a well-understood classification system is attained in such a scheme, one must possess either a priori knowledge of how the measured image parameter data relate to the galaxy types or a vast amount of examples with which to derive the classification rules. Spiekermann6 has classified galaxies into five broad morphological classes (E, SO, Sa, Sb, Sc/Ir) using a fuzzy algebra system for digitized IIIa-J Schmidt images. Whitmore' presents a classification approach using a principal component analysis (PCA) of a variety of photometric parameters, some of which are based on metric measures, and hence require one to know the galaxy distance. A recent approach along this direction by Han,' where PCA is used to characterize the I-band luminosity profile of a galaxy, shows great promise. In recent work, Doi et aL9 have used the surface brightness and image concentration to discriminate between early and late type galaxies. Similarly, Abraham et al." use an image asymmetry and concentration parameter to perform a linear separation in a two-dimensional space for galaxy classification in three broad categories. From all these works, it is clear that one wishes to combine as

[1]  M. Serra-Ricart,et al.  Multidimensional statistical analysis using artificial neural networks: astronomical applications , 1993 .

[2]  James L. McClelland Explorations In Parallel Distributed Processing , 1988 .

[3]  Chris A. Collins,et al.  The Edinburgh/Durham Southern Galaxy Catalogue – II. Image classification and galaxy number counts , 1989 .

[4]  W. Keel,et al.  The Morphological Mix of Field Galaxies to [ITAL]m[/ITAL][TINF][ITAL]I[/ITAL][/TINF] = 24.25 Magnitudes ([ITAL]b[/ITAL][TINF][ITAL]J[/ITAL][/TINF] ∼ 26 Magnitudes) from a Deep [ITAL]Hubble Space Telescope[/ITAL] WFPC2 Image , 1995 .

[5]  B. Whitmore,et al.  An objective classification system for spiral galaxies. I The two dominant dimensions , 1984 .

[6]  Stephen C. Odewahn,et al.  STAR-GALAXY SEPARATION WITH A NEURAL NETWORK. II. MULTIPLE SCHMIDT PLATE FIELDS , 1993 .

[7]  G. Aldering,et al.  Galaxy Properties at the North Galactic Pole. I. Photometric Properties on Large Spatial Scales , 1995 .

[8]  Monique Thonnat Toward an Automatic Classification of Galaxies , 1989 .

[9]  Mamoru Doi,et al.  Morphological classification of galaxies using simple photometric parameters , 1993 .

[10]  Lennox L. Cowie,et al.  Faintest galaxy morphologies from hst wfpc2 imaging of the hawaii survey fields , 1995 .

[11]  Stephen C. Odewahn,et al.  Automated Morphological Classification in Deep Hubble Space Telescope UBVI Fields: Rapidly and Passively Evolving Faint Galaxy Populations , 1996 .

[12]  Ofer Lahav Artificial neural networks as non-linear extensions of statistical methods in astronomy , 1994 .

[13]  The Contribution of Late-Type/Irregulars to the Faint Galaxy Counts from Hubble Space Telescope Medium-Deep Survey Images , 1995, astro-ph/9511123.

[14]  O. Lahav,et al.  Morphological Classification of galaxies by Artificial Neural Networks , 1992 .

[15]  A. Naim,et al.  Automated morphological classification of APM galaxies by supervised artificial neural networks , 1995, astro-ph/9503001.

[16]  E. Slezak,et al.  Galaxy counts in the Coma supercluster field. II: Automated image detection and classification , 1988 .

[17]  N. R. Tanvir,et al.  Galaxy morphology to I = 25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field , 1996 .

[18]  Mingsheng Han The luminosity structure and objective classification of galaxies , 1995 .

[19]  S. Charlot,et al.  Spectral evolution of stellar populations using isochrone synthesis , 1993 .

[20]  G. Spiekermann Automated Morphological Classification of Faint Galaxies , 1992 .

[21]  S. Odewahn,et al.  Automated star/galaxy discrimination with neural networks , 1992 .

[22]  S. C. Odewahn,et al.  AUTOMATED CLASSIFICATION OF ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES , 1995 .