Effects of haloperidol and d-amphetamine on perceived quantity of foods and tones

The hypothesis that dopamine (DA) receptor agonists and antagonists affect “hedonia” associated with natural rewards was tested, using a psychophysical procedure previously shown to be sensitive to both the sweetness of food and the motivational state of rats. Rats were first trained to discriminate between two different quantities of a rewarding stimulus by pressing one of two levers. Perceived quantity was subsequently derived from generalization trials of intermediate quantities. Haloperidol (0.03–0.083 mg/kg), a DA receptor antagonist, did not influence perceived food quantity, an indirect marker of hedonic value. On the other hand, d-amphetamine (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) affected perceived food quantity in a dose-dependent fashion, and in the same direction as occurs after increasing hunger or food sweetness. Both haloperidol and amphetamine influenced the perceived quantity of a stimulus without natural reinforcing properties (a tone), but the effect of amphetamine on the perceived quantity of this initially neutral stimulus was opposite in direction to that observed with food. These results suggest that whereas amphetamine affects hedonic processes, haloperidol does not. In addition, it seems that haloperidol probably produces its actions through effects on motor mechanisms or by interfering with the response-facilitating properties of rewards.

[1]  R. Church,et al.  Methamphetamine and time estimation. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  T. Robbins,et al.  Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[3]  K. Franklin,et al.  Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: Stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit , 1979, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[4]  R. Wise.  Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  The effect of pimozide on variable-interval performance: A test of the ‘anhedonia’ hypothesis of the mode of action of neuroleptics , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[6]  R. Wise,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. , 1978, Science.

[7]  T. Robbins,et al.  Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[8]  F. Bloom,et al.  Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia. , 1981, Science.

[9]  Examination of the effects of pimozide on two conditional discrimination problems differing in levels of task complexity. , 1981, Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology.

[10]  A. Phillips,et al.  Haloperidol-induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: attenuation by prior training or by anticholinergic drugs. , 1975, European journal of pharmacology.

[11]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociable effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and α-flupenthixol on choice and rate measures of reinforcement in the rat , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[12]  A. Kelley,et al.  Effects of peripheral and central dopamine blockade on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation: Evidence for both reward and motor deficits , 1983, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[13]  R. Church,et al.  The differential effects of haloperidol and methamphetamine on time estimation in the rat , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[14]  S. Fowler,et al.  Some effects of pimozide on nondeprived rats licking sucrose solutions in an anhedonia paradigm , 1984, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[15]  M. Spetch,et al.  The effect of d-amphetamine on short-term memory for time in pigeons , 1984, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[16]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  The effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour maintained under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[17]  Murray Sidman,et al.  Behavioral Pharmacology , 2004, Psychopharmacologia.

[18]  Mark Appelbaum,et al.  Bias in the Analysis of Repeated-Measures Designs: Some Alternative Approaches. , 1973 .

[19]  Anthony G. Phillips,et al.  Decreased resistance to extinction after haloperidol: Implications for the role of dopamine in reinforcement , 1979, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[20]  W. Faustman,et al.  Use of operant response duration to distinguish the effects of haloperidol from nonreward , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[21]  H. Anisman,et al.  Alteration of exploration and the response to food associated cues after treatment with pimozide , 1983, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[22]  R. Beninger.  A comparison of the effects of pimozide and nonreinforcement on discriminated operant responding in rats , 1982, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[23]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  Failure of pimozide to disrupt the acquisition of light-dark and spatial discrimination problems , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[24]  T. Robbins.  The potentiation of conditioned reinforcement by psychomotor stimulant drugs. A Test of Hill's Hypothesis , 2004, Psychopharmacologia.

[25]  R. Wise,et al.  Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits , 1976, Brain Research.

[26]  K. Franklin.  Catecholamines and self-stimulation: Reward and performance effects dissociated , 1978, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[27]  D. Sanger,et al.  The effects of pimozide and of reward omission on fixed-interval behavior of rats maintained by food and electrical brain stimulation , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[28]  J. Salamone.  Different effects of haloperidol and extinction on instrumental behaviours , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[29]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function , 1984, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[30]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  Effects of pimozide on accuracy of performance and distribution of correct responding on a simultaneous discrimination task in the rat , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[31]  T. Tombaugh.  Effects of pimozide on nondiscriminated and discriminated performance in the pigeon , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[32]  R. Wise,et al.  Effects of pimozide on lever pressing behavior maintained on an intermittent reinforcement schedule , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[33]  Alteration in the perception of food quantity by rats induced by manipulations of hunger and food sweetness , 1988 .

[34]  G. Heyman,et al.  Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[35]  S. T. Mason,et al.  Pimozide-induced suppression of responding: Evidence against a block of food reward , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[36]  G. Heyman.  A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.