Modeling tag loss in New Zealand fur seal pups

Mark-recapture studies of pinnipeds commonly use double-tagging to reduce bias of parameter estimates and to allow estimation of tag retention rates. However, most tag retention estimates assume independence of tag loss. Here we were able to identify when individual New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) pups had lost both tags ; therefore, we tested the assumption of no association between the tag-loss rates of left and right tags. We also tested for differences in tag retention among three different types of plastic tag (Allflex® cattle, mini and button tags), between two attachment types (i.e., fixed or swivel), and whether retention varied among years and colonies sampled. We found strong evidence of within-individual tag loss association for most tags in most years, but little evidence that this varied among colonies. We found that ignoring within-individual association of tag loss led to a bias in estimated tag retention of 7.4-10.1%. Smaller rocks and greater crevice and ledge densities in colonies were associated with lower probabilities of tag retention. We suggest researchers should attempt to use permanent marks in combination with tags to assess unbiased estimates of tag retention.

[1]  I. Stirling.  Studies on the behaviour on the South Ausralian fur seal, Arctocephalus forsteri (Lesson) II. Adult females and pups , 1971 .

[2]  G. Seber,et al.  The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters , 1974 .

[3]  J. Stark,et al.  Activity budgets of New Zealand fur seals Arctocephalus forsteri during the breeding season , 1977 .

[4]  R. Mattlin.  Population biology, thermoregulation and site preference of the New Zealand fur seal, arctocephalus forsteri (lesson, 1828), on the Open Bay Islands, New Zealand. , 1978 .

[5]  A. N. Arnason,et al.  Bias and Loss of Precision Due to Tag Loss in Jolly–Seber Estimates for Mark–Recapture Experiments , 1981 .

[6]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Capture-Recapture Models Allowing for Age-Dependent Survival and Capture Rates , 1981 .

[7]  J. Croxall,et al.  Fecundity, Survival and Site Fidelity in Weddell Seals, Leptonychotes weddelli , 1983 .

[8]  W. Bowen,et al.  Mark–Recapture Estimates of Harp Seal Pup (Phoca groenlandica) Production in the Northwest Atlantic , 1983 .

[9]  J. Thomas,et al.  AN IMPLANTED TRANSPONDER CHIP USED AS A TAG FOR SEA OTTERS (ENHYDRA LUTRIS) , 1987 .

[10]  G. Newkirk,et al.  Individual marking of Atlantic salmon: evaluation of cold branding and jet injection of Alcian Blue in several fin locations , 1990 .

[11]  Does Tagging and Handling Affect the Growth of Northern Fur Seal Pups (Callorhinus ursinus) , 1991 .

[12]  K. Ralls,et al.  Reproduction, survival and tag loss in California sea otters , 1991 .

[13]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[14]  P. Rothery,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS CATTLE EAR TAGS AS MARKERS FOR WEDDELL SEALS , 1992 .

[15]  P. Shaughnessy.  Tag-shedding from South African fur seals Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus , 1994 .

[16]  John K. Horne,et al.  Tag loss in grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and potential effects on population estimates , 1994 .

[17]  F. Trillmich,et al.  Summer foraging by lactating female New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) off Otago Peninsula, New Zealand , 1995 .

[18]  P. Shaughnessy,et al.  Changes in the abundance of New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, on Kangaroo Island, South Australia , 1995 .

[19]  M. Bester,et al.  Tag-loss in southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina, at Marion Island , 1997, Antarctic Science.

[20]  P. Reijnders,et al.  Maximum likelihood population size estimation of harbour seals in the Dutch Wadden Sea based on a mark–recapture experiment , 1998 .

[21]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  New Zealand sea lion predation on New Zealand fur seals , 1998 .

[22]  Duane R. Diefenbach,et al.  Modeling and evaluation of ear tag loss in black bears , 1998 .

[23]  D. Costa,et al.  Seasonal dive behaviour of lactating New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) , 1998 .

[24]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Seasonal oscillation in shore attendance and transience of New Zealand fur seals , 1999 .

[25]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Pup density related to terrestrial habitat use by New Zealand fur seals , 1999 .

[26]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Geographic and temporal variation in the condition of pups of the New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri): evidence for density dependence and differences in the marine environment , 2000 .

[27]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .