Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision

It is thought by cognitive scientists and typographers alike, that lower-case text is more legible than upper-case. Yet lower-case letters are, on average, smaller in height and width than upper-case characters, which suggests an upper-case advantage. Using a single unaltered font and all upper-, all lower-, and mixed-case text, we assessed size thresholds for words and random strings, and reading speeds for text with normal and visually impaired participants. Lower-case thresholds were roughly 0.1 log unit higher than upper. Reading speeds were higher for upper- than for mixed-case text at sizes twice acuity size; at larger sizes, the upper-case advantage disappeared. Results suggest that upper-case is more legible than the other case styles, especially for visually-impaired readers, because smaller letter sizes can be used than with the other case styles, with no diminution of legibility.

[1]  J. Gaddum Probit Analysis , 1948, Nature.

[2]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[3]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Visual Requirements for Reading , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  J. M. Cattell THE TIME TAKEN UP BY CEREBRAL OPERATIONS , 1886 .

[6]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[7]  James Gaston Bloodsworth Legibility of Print. , 1993 .

[8]  F. Smith,et al.  The effect of type size and case alteration on word identification : American Journal of Psychology, 1969, 82.2, 248–253 , 1970 .

[9]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[10]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[11]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[12]  J. Lewis,et al.  Probit Analysis (3rd ed). , 1972 .

[13]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  Influence of type form on speed of reading. , 1928 .

[14]  A. Arditi Lapse resistance in the verbal letter reporting task , 2006, Vision Research.

[15]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  F. Smith,et al.  The effect of type size and case alternation on word identification. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  M. Tinker,et al.  The influence of form of type on the perception of words. , 1932 .

[18]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Word Length, Prose Difficulty, and Reading Ratea , 1976 .

[19]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Reading without saccadic eye movements , 1992, Vision Research.

[20]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading. III. Length of line. , 1929 .

[21]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation , 1994, Vision Research.

[22]  Jan E Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Prescribing near magnification for low vision patients , 1999, Clinical & experimental optometry.