Learning by Discovery: A Critical Review of Studies.

In this review an attempt is made to determine what findings can be drawn from discovery learning experiments. The results of these experiments are conflicting and often insignificant, but they tend to favor discovery learning methods compared to other teaching methods. However, many results are suspect due to limitations in experimental design and analysis, as is demonstrated in a critical analysis of the studies. Also, direct comparison of experimental findings is difficult due to differing ideas concerning the nature of discovery learning, Progress in this field will be limited until the experimental methodology is improved, and until acceptable operational definitions of discovery learning variables are used; some relevant proposals are briefly discussed.

[1]  William Henry Winch Inductive versus deductive methods of teaching , 1913 .

[2]  G. Hendrix A New Clue to Transfer of Training , 1947, The Elementary School Journal.

[3]  R. Craig Directed versus independent discovery of established relations. , 1956 .

[4]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[5]  Jack E. Kittell An experimental study of the effect of external direction during learning on transfer and retention of principles. , 1957 .

[6]  Bernard R. Corman The effect of varying amounts and kinds of information as guidance in problem solving. , 1957 .

[7]  R. Forgus,et al.  Efficient Retention and Transfer as Affected By Learning Method , 1957 .

[8]  Bert Y. Kersh The adequacy of "meaning" as an explanation for the superiority of learning by independent discovery. , 1958 .

[9]  G. M. Haslerud,et al.  The transfer value of given and individually derived principles. , 1958 .

[10]  Carter Victor Good,et al.  Dictionary of Education , 1959 .

[11]  Charles Nelson Grote,et al.  A Comparison of the Relative Effectiveness of Direct-Detailed and Directed Discovery Methods of Teaching Selected Principles of Mechanics in the Area of Physics , 1960 .

[12]  John D. Rowlett An Experimental Comparison of Direct-Detailed and Directed Discovery Methods of Teaching Orthographic Projection Principles and Skills , 1960 .

[13]  An Experimental Study of the Relative Effectiveness of the Direct-Detailed and the Directed Discovery Methods of Teaching Letterpress Imposition , 1960 .

[14]  Willis E. Ray Pupil Discovery vs. Direct Instruction , 1961 .

[15]  J. Bruner The act of discovery. , 1961 .

[16]  R. Gagne,et al.  Some factors in the programming of conceptual learning. , 1961 .

[17]  Bert Y. Kersh The motivating effect of learning by directed discovery. , 1962 .

[18]  Robert Morris Tomlinson A Comparison of Four Methods of Presentation for Teaching Complex Technical Material , 1962 .

[19]  D. Ausubel The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. , 1963 .

[20]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  Verbal stimuli in concept formation: Learning by discovery. , 1963 .

[21]  J. Scandura An Analysis of Exposition and Discovery Modes of Problem Solving Instruction , 1964 .

[22]  Marion Foord ARITHMETIC: Inductive versus Deductive Methods of Teaching Area by programmed Instruction , 1964 .

[23]  D. Olson NOTE ON HASLERUD AND MEYERS' TRANSFER-OF-PRINCIPLES EXPERIMENT. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[24]  B. Friedlander,et al.  A Psychologist's Second Thoughts on Concepts, Curiosity, and Discovery in Teaching and Learning , 1965 .

[25]  R. Gagne Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[26]  Frank P. Belcastro,et al.  RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE METHODS OF PROGRAMMING ALGEBRA , 1966 .

[27]  LEARNING BY DISCOVERY: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO MEASURE ITS EFFECTIVENESS FOR TEACHING VALUE CONCEPTS , 1967 .

[28]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Expository instruction versus a discovery method. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[29]  Blaine R. Worthern Discovery and Expository Task Presentation in Elementary Mathematics. , 1968 .