Using patents and publications to assess R&D efficiency in the states of the USA

Even with the USA spending the largest amounts in R&D, its share in total patent grants worldwide has been declining. This decline is also evident in its share of world scientific publications. These developments have been termed by some as the "American Paradox". Extant research on R&D efficiency and technological innovation capability has considered the USA as a homogeneous entity and has not focused at the sub-national level. This paper analyses the R&D efficiency of 50 US states and the District of Columbia. R&D efficiency is calculated as the ratio of patents granted and scientific publications to R&D expenditures. Only 14 states out of the 51 regions are found to exhibit positive changes in R&D efficiency between 2004 and 2008. Comparing this performance with that of the BRICS nations over the same period we find that Brazil, India, China and South Korea show significant improvements in R&D efficiency with India taking the lead. This research identifies the states in the US with the highest R&D efficiency and presents benchmarks which can be followed by policy interventions. The paper highlights the importance of conducting analyses of R&D efficiency using patents and publications at the sub-national level for informed policy making.

[1]  Guan Jiancheng,et al.  Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency , 2004 .

[2]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  Scientific Output and Impact: Relative Positions of China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA , 2008 .

[3]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[4]  Loet Leydesdorff.  On the “scientometric decline” of British science. One additional graph in reply to Ben Martin , 2005, Scientometrics.

[5]  Tim Peacock,et al.  Charting the decline in British science , 1985, Nature.

[6]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[7]  R. May.  The Scientific Wealth of Nations , 1997, Science.

[8]  G. Dosi,et al.  The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ , 2006 .

[9]  Tibor Braun,et al.  The landscape of national performances in the sciences, 1981–1985 , 2005, Scientometrics.

[10]  Ying He,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of domestic and international outputs in Information Science & Technology research of China , 2005, Scientometrics.

[11]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world , 2008, Scientometrics.

[12]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  International comparisons of scientific performance revisited , 1989, Scientometrics.

[13]  H. Grupp.  Efficiency of government intervention in technical change in telecommunications: ten national economies compared , 1993 .

[14]  Joaquim Borges Gouveia,et al.  Scientific productivity paradox: The case of China's S&T system , 2006, Scientometrics.

[15]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators , 1997, Scientometrics.

[16]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Measuring China"s research performance using the Science Citation Index , 2002, Scientometrics.

[17]  Wei Meng,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China , 2006, Scientometrics.

[18]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[20]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  The scientific wealth of European nations: Taking effectiveness into account , 1998, Scientometrics.

[21]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985 , 1989, Scientometrics.

[22]  S. Teitel,et al.  Patents, R & D expenditures, country size, and per-capita income: An international comparison , 2005, Scientometrics.

[23]  Riccardo Crescenzi,et al.  R&D, Socio-Economic Conditions and Regional Innovation in the United States , 2012 .

[24]  Nan Ma,et al.  A comparative study of research performance in computer science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[25]  Diana Hicks.  America's Innovative Edge At Risk? , 2005 .

[26]  Chun-Yao Tseng.  Technological Innovation in The Bric Economies , 2009 .

[27]  E. Wang,et al.  Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach , 2007 .

[28]  Hugo Horta,et al.  Opening the box: comparing EU and US scientific output by scientific field , 2007 .

[29]  Akira Goto,et al.  R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries , 1989 .

[30]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of regional development policies in Northern Greece using data envelopment analysis , 1998 .

[31]  Guido Van Hooydonk,et al.  Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: consequences for evaluation studies , 2000 .

[32]  R. May.  The Scientific Investments of Nations , 1998, Science.

[33]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance , 2001, Scientometrics.

[34]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Analyzing R&D efficiency in Asia and the OECD: An application of the Malmquist Productivity Index , 2009, 2009 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy.

[35]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Science and technology in the region: The output of regional science and technology, its strengths and its leading institutions , 2005, Scientometrics.

[36]  Robert D. Shelton,et al.  Relations between national research investment and publication output: Application to an American Paradox , 2008, Scientometrics.

[37]  Robert D. Shelton,et al.  The US-EU race for leadership of science and technology: Qualitative and quantitative indicators , 2004, Scientometrics.

[38]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system , 2009, Scientometrics.

[39]  Zhiping Yang,et al.  A patent based evaluation of technological innovation capability in eight economic regions in PR China , 2009 .

[40]  K. Müller,et al.  The regional distribution of research and development (a note) , 1972 .

[41]  P. Zhou,et al.  The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science. Research Policy, 35(1), 2006, 83-104. , 2006, 0911.3421.

[42]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  In search of the European Paradox: an international comparison of Europe's scientific performance and knowledge flows in information and communication technologies research , 1999 .

[43]  V. Meliciani.  The relationship between R&D, investment and patents: a panel data analysis , 2000 .