Performance evaluation of restaurant food waste and biowaste to biogas pilot projects in China and implications for national policy.

The objective of this research was to conduct a performance evaluation of three food waste/biowaste-to-biogas pilot projects across 7 scenarios in China based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methodology. The projects ranked included a food waste-biogas project in Beijing, a food waste-biogas project in Suzhou and a co-digestion project producing biomethane in Hainan. The projects were ranked from best to worst based on technical, economic and environmental criteria under the MCDA framework. The results demonstrated that some projects are encountering operational problems. Based on these findings, six national policy recommendations were provided: (1) shift away from capital investment subsidies to performance-based subsidies; (2) re-design feed in tariffs; (3) promote bio-methane and project clustering; (4) improve collection efficiency by incentivizing FW producers to direct waste to biogas projects; (5) incentivize biogas projects to produce multiple outputs; (6) incentivize food waste-based projects to co-digest food waste with other substrates for higher gas output.

[1]  Ville Uusitalo,et al.  Evaluation of methods for estimating energy performance of biogas production , 2014 .

[2]  Wei Wang,et al.  Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste: Focusing on biogas production and GHG reduction , 2012 .

[3]  J la Cour Jansen,et al.  Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems--current status and potential improvements. , 2012, Waste management.

[4]  Fenglin Liu,et al.  Effects of mixture ratio on anaerobic co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste and food waste of China. , 2011, Journal of environmental sciences.

[5]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Environmental sustainability assessment of food waste valorization options , 2014 .

[6]  T. Tan,et al.  The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[7]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[8]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  S. Heaven,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: performance assessment by mass and energy balance. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Zongguo Wen,et al.  Biomethane production potential from restaurant food waste in megacities and project level-bottlenecks: A case study in Beijing , 2016 .

[11]  Liwei Geng,et al.  Carbon emissions calculation from municipal solid waste and the influencing factors analysis in China , 2015 .

[12]  Pragasen Pillay,et al.  Biogas prediction and design of a food waste to energy system for the urban environment. , 2012 .

[13]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Long-term anaerobic digestion of food waste stabilized by trace elements. , 2012, Waste management.

[14]  Qinghai Li,et al.  An overview of characteristics of municipal solid waste fuel in China: Physical, chemical composition and heating value , 2014 .

[15]  Persson Tobias,et al.  Biomethane: Status and Factors Affecting Market Development and Trade , 2014 .

[16]  A. Bernstad,et al.  Separate collection of household food waste for anaerobic degradation - Comparison of different techniques from a systems perspective. , 2012, Waste management.

[17]  Knud Villy Christensen,et al.  A review of the biogas industry in China , 2011 .

[18]  Shu-lin Chen,et al.  Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste with Dairy Manure in a Two-Phase Digestion System , 2010, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[19]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[20]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Hsien Hui Khoo,et al.  Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[23]  Fred O Agyeman,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and dairy manure: effects of food waste particle size and organic loading rate. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Sonia Heaven,et al.  Trace element requirements for stable food waste digestion at elevated ammonia concentrations. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[25]  Irene M C Lo,et al.  A proposed framework of food waste collection and recycling for renewable biogas fuel production in Hong Kong. , 2016, Waste management.

[26]  Wei Chen,et al.  Life cycle assessment of food waste-based biogas generation , 2015 .

[27]  Zhixin Yu,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of energy consumption and environmental impact of an integrated food waste-based biogas plant , 2015 .

[28]  N J Themelis,et al.  Assessment of the state of food waste treatment in the United States and Canada. , 2010, Waste management.

[29]  Ngoc Bao Dung Thi,et al.  An overview of food waste management in developing countries: Current status and future perspective. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  Shubiao Wu,et al.  Performance and kinetic evaluation of semi-continuously fed anaerobic digesters treating food waste: role of trace elements. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[31]  Yuanjia Wang,et al.  Performance evaluation model of a pilot food waste collection system in Suzhou City, China. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.