Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques

BackgroundAn increasing number of manufactured nanomaterials (NMs) are being used in industrial products and need to be registered under the REACH legislation. The hazard characterisation of all these forms is not only technically challenging but resource and time demanding. The use of non-testing strategies like read-across is deemed essential to assure the assessment of all NMs in due time and at lower cost. The fact that read-across is based on the structural similarity of substances represents an additional difficulty for NMs as in general their structure is not unequivocally defined. In such a scenario, the identification of physicochemical properties affecting the hazard potential of NMs is crucial to define a grouping hypothesis and predict the toxicological hazards of similar NMs. In order to promote the read-across of NMs, ECHA has recently published “Recommendations for nanomaterials applicable to the guidance on QSARs and Grouping”, but no practical examples were provided in the document. Due to the lack of publicly available data and the inherent difficulties of reading-across NMs, only a few examples of read-across of NMs can be found in the literature. This manuscript presents the first case study of the practical process of grouping and read-across of NMs following the workflow proposed by ECHA.MethodsThe workflow proposed by ECHA was used and slightly modified to present the read-across case study. The Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF) was used to evaluate the uncertainties of a read-across within NMs. Chemoinformatic techniques were used to support the grouping hypothesis and identify key physicochemical properties.ResultsA dataset of 6 nanoforms of TiO2 with more than 100 physicochemical properties each was collected. In vitro comet assay result was selected as the endpoint to read-across due to data availability. A correlation between the presence of coating or large amounts of impurities and negative comet assay results was observed.ConclusionThe workflow proposed by ECHA to read-across NMs was applied successfully. Chemoinformatic techniques were shown to provide key evidence for the assessment of the grouping hypothesis and the definition of similar NMs. The RAAF was found to be applicable to NMs.

[1]  Nanogenotox Partners,et al.  Facilitating the safety evaluation of manufactured nanomaterials by characterising their potential genotoxic hazard: final publishable report , 2013 .

[2]  E. W. Morris.  No , 1923, The Hospital and health review.

[3]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R , 2010 .

[4]  Damjana Drobne,et al.  Experimental evidence of false-positive Comet test results due to TiO2 particle – assay interactions , 2013, Nanotoxicology.

[5]  Nathaniel C. Cady,et al.  Terminal phosphate group influence on DNA - TiO 2 nanoparticle interactions , 2009 .

[6]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[7]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Can the comet assay be used reliably to detect nanoparticle‐induced genotoxicity? , 2015, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[8]  Andrew P Worth,et al.  A theoretical framework for predicting the oxidative stress potential of oxide nanoparticles , 2011, Nanotoxicology.

[9]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Critical factors to be considered when testing nanomaterials for genotoxicity with the comet assay. , 2015, Mutagenesis.

[10]  A. Romoser,et al.  Cytotoxicological Response to Engineered Nanomaterials: A Pathway-Driven Process , 2012 .

[11]  Koki Kanehira,et al.  Effect of Polyethylene Glycol Modification of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Cytotoxicity and Gene Expressions in Human Cell Lines , 2012, International journal of molecular sciences.

[12]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Novel approach for efficient predictions properties of large pool of nanomaterials based on limited set of species: nano-read-across , 2015, Nanotechnology.

[13]  A Worth,et al.  Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: a review , 2018, Nanotoxicology.

[14]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Genotoxicity of metal oxide nanomaterials: review of recent data and discussion of possible mechanisms. , 2015, Nanoscale.

[15]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Mechanisms of genotoxicity. A review of in vitro and in vivo studies with engineered nanoparticles , 2014, Nanotoxicology.

[16]  Lang Tran,et al.  ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[17]  Phil Sayre,et al.  Review of achievements of the OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials' Testing and Assessment Programme. From exploratory testing to test guidelines. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[18]  Marie Carrière,et al.  Toxicological consequences of TiO2, SiC nanoparticles and multi-walled carbon nanotubes exposure in several mammalian cell types: an in vitro study , 2010 .

[19]  Kimberly F. Sellers,et al.  Grouping nanomaterials : A strategy towards grouping and read-across , 2015 .

[20]  Y. Horiuchi,et al.  Understanding TiO2 photocatalysis: mechanisms and materials. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[21]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Impact of agglomeration and different dispersions of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the human related in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[22]  Yongsheng Chen,et al.  Nanoparticles inhibit DNA replication by binding to DNA: modeling and experimental validation. , 2013, ACS nano.

[23]  T W Schultz,et al.  A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[24]  H. Lindberg,et al.  Genotoxic effects of nanosized and fine TiO2 , 2009, Human & experimental toxicology.

[25]  Olivier Witschger,et al.  Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of nanosized and microsized titanium dioxide and iron oxide particles in Syrian hamster embryo cells. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[26]  Sharon Munn,et al.  The Adverse Outcome Pathway approach in nanotoxicology , 2017 .

[27]  OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS DISPERSION STABILITY OF NANOMATERIALS IN SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA , 2017 .

[28]  C. Gini.  Variabilita e Mutabilita. , 1913 .

[29]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  The use of the comet assay for the evaluation of the genotoxicity of nanomaterials , 2015, Front. Genet..

[30]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. , 2012, ACS nano.

[31]  P. A. Schulte,et al.  Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[32]  Robert H Schiestl,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce DNA damage and genetic instability in vivo in mice. , 2009, Cancer research.

[33]  Q. Chaudhry,et al.  Opinion on titanium dioxide (nano form) as UV-filter in spraysSCCS/1583/17 – Final(Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg (52 pages) (2019) - ISSN : 1831-4767 - ISBN : 978-92-76-00201-7 - DOI : 10.2875/645612 - Catalog Number : EW-AQ-19-001-EN-N) , 2019 .

[34]  Test No. 412: Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study , 2018, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4.

[35]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  Case studies putting the decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) into practice. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[36]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al.  Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering , 2006, Bioinform..

[37]  Tomasz Puzyn,et al.  How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated? , 2016, Nanoscale.

[38]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[39]  Hugh J. Byrne,et al.  Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment – report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10 , 2013, Nanotoxicology.

[40]  Cotogno Giulio,et al.  Titanium Dioxide, NM-100, NM-101, NM-102, NM-103, NM-104, NM-105: Characterisation and Physico-Chemical Properties , 2014 .

[41]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[42]  Peter Wick,et al.  Can the Ames test provide an insight into nano-object mutagenicity? Investigating the interaction between nano-objects and bacteria , 2013, Nanotoxicology.

[43]  Sylvie Sauvaigo,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles exhibit genotoxicity and impair DNA repair activity in A549 cells , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[44]  Usage of (eco)toxicological data for bridging data gaps between and grouping of nanoforms of the same substance , 2016 .