Process Virtualization Theory and the Impact of Information Technology

In our increasingly virtual society, more and more processes that have traditionally been conducted via physical mechanisms are being conducted virtually. This phenomenon of “process virtualization” is happening in many contexts, including formal education (via distance learning), shopping (via electronic commerce), and friendship development (via social networking sites and virtual worlds). However, some processes are more amenable to virtualization than others. For example, distance learning seems to work better for some educational processes than others, and electronic commerce has worked well for some shopping processes but not for others. These observations motivate the central question posed in this paper: What factors affect the “virtualizability” of a process? This question is becoming increasingly important as advances in information technology create the potential for society to virtualize more and more processes. To provide a general theoretical basis for investigating this question, this paper proposes “process virtualization theory,” which includes four main constructs (sensory requirements, relationship requirements, synchronism requirements, and identification and control requirements) that affect whether a process is amenable or resistant to being conducted virtually. Recognizing that processes can be virtualized with or without the use of information technology, this paper makes explicit the theoretical significance of information technology in process virtualization by discussing the moderating effects of representation, reach, and monitoring capability. This helps explain how advances in information technology are enabling a new generation of virtual processes.

[1]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[4]  Uday M. Apte,et al.  Global Disaggregation of Information-Intensive Services , 1995 .

[5]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Virtual Classroom versus Physical Classroom: An Exploratory Study of Class Discussion Patterns and Student Learning in an Asynchronous Internet-Based MBA Course , 2000 .

[6]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[7]  Sharon A. Wall,et al.  The Online Educator: A Guide to Creating the Virtual Classroom: Lynch, M. M. (2002). New York: RoutledgeFalmer , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[9]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[10]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[11]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Managing Information about Processes , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[13]  E. Friedman,et al.  The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms , 2001 .

[14]  James Essinger The Virtual Banking Revolution: The Customer, the Bank and the Future , 1998 .

[15]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[16]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Elizabeth Dykstra-Erickson,et al.  Interview: Ben Shneiderman and Allison Druin , 2000, INTR.

[18]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[19]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[21]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[22]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[24]  D. Perkins,et al.  Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[25]  James Robert Robert V Walker,et al.  Baseball on Television: The Formative Years, 1939-51 , 2003 .

[26]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[27]  Florian Zettelmeyer,et al.  How the Internet Lowers Prices: Evidence from Matched Survey and Automobile Transaction Data , 2006 .

[28]  Kim Ramus,et al.  Online grocery retailing: what do consumers think? , 2005, Internet Res..

[29]  Ned Kock,et al.  The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[30]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Muhammad K. Betz Distance Education : A Systems View , 2005 .

[32]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[33]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  D. Hoffman,et al.  The Influence of Goal-Directed and Experiential Activities on Online Flow Experiences , 2003 .

[35]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology , 2000 .

[36]  Dan Ariely,et al.  What Makes You Click? Mate Preferences and Matching Outcomes in Online Dating , 2006 .

[37]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  The Quality of Online and Offline Relationships: The Role of Multiplexity and Duration of Social Relationships , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes , 1993, [1993] Proceedings Second Workshop on Enabling Technologies@m_Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[39]  Peter Gyngell,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology , 1994 .

[40]  J. O'Brien Management Information Systems: Managing Information Technology in the Networked Enterprise , 1996 .

[41]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION , 2000 .

[42]  Michael Violano,et al.  Retail banking technology : strategies and resources that seize thecompetitive advantage , 1992 .

[43]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Similarity of Activity Preferences among Friends: Those Who Play Together Stay Together. , 1979 .

[44]  John W. LeMasney,et al.  Protecting Children From Online Sexual Predators: Technological, Psychoeducational, and Legal Considerations. , 2004 .

[45]  Makoto Kobayashi,et al.  Collaborative customer services using synchronous Web browser sharing , 1998, CSCW '98.

[46]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  `Making Moosic': The Development of Personal Relationships on Line and a Comparison to their Off-Line Counterparts , 1998 .

[47]  Mikko Punakivi,et al.  Unattended reception a business opportunity? , 2004, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[48]  A. Allen,et al.  Telemedicine technology and clinical applications. , 1995, JAMA.

[49]  R. Pea,et al.  Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environments for Transformative Communications , 2004 .

[50]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..