Value analysis as a decision support tool in cruise ship design

In the cruise ship industry product development and production activities are really complex and must follow strict rules imposed by naval registries. Designers are frequently required to choose among several alternative solutions (e.g., materials, components, layouts, etc.). Because of time constraints, as a matter of fact, design decisions are made fast and in a reactive way, according to the particular case, without considering decisions made in the past and without using specific decision support tools. The final choice is often left to a single designer's experience, whose selection criteria are unknown and not formalised. As a consequence there is no shared knowledge justifying the reason why a design solution has been chosen and whether it is the best one. We developed and implemented in Fincantieri S.p.A. – a leading company in the cruise ship industry – an original decision support tool, based on value analysis, designers can use to document and formalise their choices. Value analysis is a well known structured method to increase product value and/or cut costs, thus supporting the selection of the most valuable solution by means of objective parameters. We demonstrate that the proposed tool can also facilitate reuse of the available knowledge base on decisional criteria, increase interactions between people (design staff, buyers, shipyard personnel, etc.) involved in different stages of different value analysis projects, and reduce decision time.

[1]  Kyu-Yeul Lee,et al.  Generation of production material information for a building block and simulation of block erection for process planning and scheduling in shipbuilding , 2007 .

[2]  A. Obaide,et al.  Management of project knowledge and experiences: The role of technologies and social processes , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[3]  Nigel Caldwell,et al.  Sharing Sensitive Information in Supply Relationships:: The Flaws in One-way Open-book Negotiation and the Need for Transparency , 2005 .

[4]  Paulo Carlos Kaminski,et al.  Product development process with focus on value engineering and target-costing: A case study in an automotive company , 2007 .

[5]  R. Westbrook Action research: a new paradigm for research in production andoperations management , 1995 .

[6]  Georg Disterer,et al.  Management of project knowledge and experiences , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Jamie Meil,et al.  A life cycle environmental and economic assessment of optimum value engineering in houses , 2006 .

[8]  Jacky K.H. Chung,et al.  A group decision support system for value management studies in the construction industry , 2002 .

[9]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  Multiple project management: a modern competitive necessity , 2005 .

[10]  H. Agndal,et al.  Supply chain decision-making supported by an open books policy , 2008 .

[11]  J. Jerry Kaufman The Power of FAST in Value Management , 1997 .

[12]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Using Group Decision Support System to Support Value Management Workshops , 2008 .

[13]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Action research for operations management , 2002 .

[14]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  The role of decision support systems in an indeterminate world , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  Ian Alexander,et al.  Handbook of Action Research Participative Inquiry and Practice , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  K. Swann,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology: Investment Decision Process. Part I , 1990 .