Development and formative evaluation of the e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT).

BackgroundThe use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) or e-Health is seen as essential for a modern, cost-effective health service. However, there are well documented problems with implementation of e-Health initiatives, despite the existence of a great deal of research into how best to implement e-Health (an example of the gap between research and practice). This paper reports on the development and formative evaluation of an e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT) which aims to summarise and synthesise new and existing research on implementation of e-Health initiatives, and present it to senior managers in a user-friendly format.ResultsThe content of the e-HIT was derived by combining data from a systematic review of reviews of barriers and facilitators to implementation of e-Health initiatives with qualitative data derived from interviews of "implementers", that is people who had been charged with implementing an e-Health initiative. These data were summarised, synthesised and combined with the constructs from the Normalisation Process Model. The software for the toolkit was developed by a commercial company (RocketScience). Formative evaluation was undertaken by obtaining user feedback.There are three components to the toolkit - a section on background and instructions for use aimed at novice users; the toolkit itself; and the report generated by completing the toolkit. It is available to download from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/pcph/research/ehealth/documents/e-HIT.xlsConclusionsThe e-HIT shows potential as a tool for enhancing future e-Health implementations. Further work is needed to make it fully web-enabled, and to determine its predictive potential for future implementations.

[1]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Car,et al.  Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  C. May.  A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[4]  S. J. Lewis,et al.  Health Information Technology—Results From a Roundtable Discussion , 2009, Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy : JMCP.

[5]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  Implementation research: state of the art and future directions , 2002 .

[6]  C. Helfrich,et al.  Implementation Science Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (orca): Development of an Instrument Based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (parihs) Framework , 2022 .

[7]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Understanding the implementation and integration of e-health services , 2007 .

[8]  J. Kalus.  Health information technology--results from a roundtable discussion. , 2009 .

[9]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation , 2003 .

[10]  H. Graham,et al.  Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: The reality according to policymakers , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[11]  A. Jadad,et al.  What Is eHealth (3): A Systematic Review of Published Definitions , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  Jill J. Francis,et al.  Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions , 2006, Implementation science : IS.

[13]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to spread good ideas: A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, spread and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation , 2004 .

[14]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[15]  E. Akl,et al.  NorthStar, a support tool for the design and evaluation of quality improvement interventions in healthcare , 2007, Implementation science : IS.

[16]  Carl May,et al.  Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[17]  A. Hassey.  The National Programme for IT in the NHS. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[18]  A. Farmer,et al.  Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  David S. C. Thompson,et al.  The relationship between busyness and research utilization: it is about time. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[20]  J. Hendy,et al.  Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Susan Michie,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions , 2015 .

[23]  M. Dobbins,et al.  Western University From the SelectedWorks of Anita Kothari 2007 Public health decision makers ’ informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence , 2017 .