Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis.

BACKGROUND We investigated the incidence and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions after continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We also analyzed the impact of unplanned readmissions on post-CF-LVAD survival and the costs associated with each cause of readmission. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 126 patients who underwent implantation with a CF-LVAD from January 2007 to December 2013. The timing of readmissions, hospital length of stay, and total length of device support were evaluated. Patients were followed up while receiving support, until transplantation, or until death. Direct hospital costs associated with each readmission were analyzed. RESULTS In all, 103 patients underwent implantation for bridge to transplantation and 19 patients for destination therapy; 68 patients were readmitted 156 times (2.2 times/patient) as of the end of follow-up. The median follow-up period was 11 months. While receiving device support, patients spent 93% of their time out of the hospital. The causes of readmission included gastrointestinal bleeding (19%), driveline infection (13%), and stroke (8%). The median time to first readmission was 35 days. Thirty (44%) patients were readmitted within 30 days after discharge. The median direct hospital cost of a single readmission was $7,546. Device malfunction and arrhythmias were the most costly causes of readmission. There was no significant difference in long-term survival between readmitted patients and those who were not readmitted. CONCLUSIONS Gastrointestinal bleeding and CF-LVAD-related infections were the leading causes of readmission. Patients with a CF-LVAD spent 93% of their time out of hospital after implantation, and readmissions did not have a negative impact on long-term survival. New approaches to minimize these adverse events will continue to improve the efficacy and decrease the cost of CF-LVAD therapy.

[1]  S. Russell,et al.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  B. Meyns,et al.  Time course of acquired von Willebrand disease associated with two types of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: HeartMate II and CircuLite Synergy Pocket Micro-pump. , 2013, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  M. Connock,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for patients with advanced heart failure: analysis of the British NHS bridge to transplant (BTT) program. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  Priya Sharma,et al.  Incidence and management of gastrointestinal bleeding with continuous flow assist devices. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Increased Incidence of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Following Implantation of the HeartMate II LVAD , 2010, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[6]  J. Morgan,et al.  Factors determining post-operative readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation. , 2014, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

[7]  C. Bara,et al.  Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with a centrifugal or axial continuous flow left ventricular assist device. , 2014, JACC. Heart failure.

[8]  G. Stevens,et al.  Readmissions after ventricular assist device: etiologies, patterns, and days out of hospital. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  Robert J. Huang,et al.  GI bleeding in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[10]  T. Nakatani,et al.  Importance of early appropriate intervention including antibiotics and wound care for device-related infection in patients with left ventricular assist device. , 2014, Transplantation proceedings.

[11]  L. Nielsen,et al.  Severely impaired von Willebrand factor-dependent platelet aggregation in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (HeartMate II). , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Robert L Kormos,et al.  Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[13]  Yariv N. Marmor,et al.  Readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Gregory J. Stoddard,et al.  Pulsatility and the Risk of Nonsurgical Bleeding in Patients Supported With the Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device HeartMate II , 2013, Circulation. Heart failure.

[15]  O H Frazier,et al.  Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Slaughter,et al.  Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome in Patients With an Axial Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device , 2010, Circulation. Heart failure.

[17]  Elisa F. Long,et al.  Comparative Survival and Cost-Effectiveness of Advanced Therapies for End-Stage Heart Failure , 2014, Circulation. Heart failure.

[18]  V. Jeevanandam,et al.  Modified HeartMate II Driveline Externalization Technique Significantly Decreases Incidence of Infection and Improves Long-Term Survival , 2014, ASAIO journal.

[19]  Mark S. Slaughter,et al.  Survival on the heart transplant waiting list: impact of continuous flow left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplant. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.