The use of semantic differential scales in listening tests: A comparison between context and laboratory test conditions for the rolling sounds of office chairs

Semantic differentials are frequently used to investigate sounds from a subjective point of view. The application of semantic differentials to the case of the rolling sound of office chairs is dealt with in this study. After a preliminary selection of the semantic differentials by fifty-two participants, another ninety participants took part in a listening test and described the acoustic stimuli of two office chairs, of high and low quality, respectively, rolling over polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ceramic and wood floorings, under context and laboratory test conditions. Under laboratory condition, recorded real stimuli were presented to the listeners via headphones, or under SounBe condition. SounBe is a new tool that has recently been conceived to explore sound at an early design stage. With this method, interactions between a chair and the floor are simplified, a mechanical sound is produced of a wheel moving across a flooring tile, and the recorded stimuli are then presented to the listeners through headphones. Four 7-point Likert scale semantic differentials, related to calmness, roughness, pleasantness and annoyance, were used to collect subjective data. Objective data were instead obtained from psychoacoustic indexes. Factors such as gender and weight were found to have no effect on the subjective and objective data. The flooring factor instead resulted to have much more influence than the chair factor. No statistically significant difference was observed between the test conditions on the semantic differential scales, thus proving the compatibility between SounBe and real sounds.

[1]  C. Osgood.  The nature and measurement of meaning. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Etienne Parizet,et al.  Multi-dimensional listening test: selection of sound descriptors and design of the experiment , 1999 .

[3]  Richard H. Lyon.  Product sound quality from perception to design , 2000 .

[4]  J N Filho,et al.  Noise analysis in professional office chairs. , 2012, Work.

[5]  Jean-François Bassereau,et al.  Perception and Deception: How Quantity and Quality of Sensory Information Affect Users' Perception of Office Chairs , 2008 .

[6]  A. Coskun Samli.  Information-Driven Marketing Decisions: Development of Strategic Information Systems , 1996 .

[7]  Okan Sirin,et al.  State-of-the-Art Review on Sustainable Design and Construction of Quieter Pavements—Part 2: Factors Affecting Tire-Pavement Noise and Prediction Models , 2016 .

[8]  Anders Kjellberg,et al.  Noise in the office: Part II — The scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide , 1994 .

[9]  Christine M. Haslegrave,et al.  Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics And The Design Of Work , 1986 .

[10]  Tetsuro Saeki,et al.  Effects of acoustical noise on annoyance, performance and fatigue during mental memory task , 2004 .

[11]  Guillaume Lemaitre,et al.  A lexical analysis of environmental sound categories. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[12]  Claudia De Giorgi,et al.  SounBe, a toolkit for designers dealing with sound projects , 2014 .

[13]  Yoshiharu Soeta,et al.  Survey of interior noise characteristics in various types of trains , 2013 .

[14]  L. N. Solomon.  Semantic Approach to the Perception of Complex Sounds , 1958 .

[15]  D. Levitin,et al.  Ecological validity of soundscape reproduction , 2004 .

[16]  Jochen Steffens,et al.  When do we judge sounds? Relevant everyday situations for the estimation of ecological validity of indoor soundscape experiments , 2013 .

[17]  Hiroaki Uchida,et al.  Approach for combining physical properties and sensibility for pleasant beverage can-opening sound , 2016 .

[18]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  The effect of walking sounds from different walked-on materials on the soundscape of urban parks , 2016 .

[19]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Short-term noise annoyance assessment in passenger compartments of high-speed trains under sudden variation , 2015 .

[21]  Patrick Susini,et al.  Designing sound identity: providing new communication tools for building brands "corporate sound" , 2014, Audio Mostly Conference.

[22]  Fengxiang Qiao,et al.  Impacts of pavement types on in-vehicle noise and human health , 2016, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[23]  M. Raimbault.  Qualitative judgements of urban soundscapes : Questionning questionnaires and semantic scales , 2006 .

[24]  Jian Kang,et al.  Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models , 2016 .

[25]  Pd Pierre Lévy,et al.  Designing for Perceptual Crossing: Applying and Evaluating Design Notions , 2012 .

[26]  Christina Bodin Danielsson,et al.  Office Type in Relation to Health, Well-Being, and Job Satisfaction Among Employees , 2008 .

[27]  Giuseppe Ragazzini,et al.  Il Ragazzini/Biagi concise : dizionario inglese italiano/Italian and English dictionary , 2010 .

[28]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Sound radiation and sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments , 2007 .

[29]  Sabine Langlois,et al.  Instruction's effect on semantic scale ratings of interior car sounds. , 2009 .

[30]  Arne Nykänen,et al.  Car Ride Before Entering the Lab Increases Precision in Listening Tests , 2015 .

[31]  Leland Wilkinson,et al.  An Analytic Approximation to the Distribution of Lilliefors's Test Statistic for Normality , 1986 .

[32]  E. Ozcan Vieira,et al.  Basic Semantics of Product Sounds , 2012 .

[33]  Gary Charness,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 2022 .

[34]  Frederik Nagel,et al.  Audio quality evaluation by experienced and inexperienced listeners , 2013 .

[35]  D. Rocchesso,et al.  On the effectiveness of vocal imitations and verbal descriptions of sounds. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  F. Pellerey,et al.  Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Catherine Lavandier,et al.  Perceived quality features of aircraft sounds: An analysis of the measurement characteristics of a newly created semantic differential , 2009 .

[38]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  Verbal expression of emotional impression of sound: A cross-cultural study , 1991 .

[39]  Luca Turchet,et al.  Semantic congruence in audio–haptic simulation of footsteps , 2014 .

[40]  Hui Xie,et al.  Sound field of typical single-bed hospital wards , 2012 .

[41]  Willem-Paul Brinkman.  Design of a Questionnaire Instrument , 2009 .

[42]  B. Stein,et al.  The Merging of the Senses , 1993 .

[43]  Okan Sirin,et al.  State-of-the-Art Review on Sustainable Design and Construction of Quieter Pavements—Part 1: Traffic Noise Measurement and Abatement Techniques , 2016 .

[44]  William W. Gaver.  What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[45]  Stefan Weinzierl,et al.  Assessing the plausibility of virtual acoustic environments , 2012 .

[46]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Effect of train type on annoyance and acoustic features of the rolling noise. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[48]  Patrick Susini,et al.  Toward the design and evaluation of continuous sound in tangible interfaces: The Spinotron , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[49]  William J. Davies,et al.  Soundscape reproduction and synthesis , 2014 .