A MULTITEMPORAL AND NON-PARAMETRIC APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF DROUGHT ON VEGETATION GREENNESS: A CASE STUDY FOR LATIN AMERICA

This study evaluates the relationship between the frequency and duration of meteorological droughts and the subsequent temporal changes on the quantity of actively photosynthesizing biomass (greenness) estimated from satellite imagery on rainfed croplands in Latin America. An innovative non-parametric and non-supervised approach, based on the Fisher-Jenks optimal classification algorithm, is used to identify multi-scale meteorological droughts on the basis of empirical cumulative distributions of 1, 3, 6, and 12-monthly precipitation totals. As input data for the classifier, we use the gridded GPCC Full Data Reanalysis precipitation time-series product, which ranges from January 1901 to December 2010 and is interpolated at the spatial resolution of 1° (decimal degree, DD). Vegetation greenness composites are derived from 10-daily SPOTVEGETATION images at the spatial resolution of 1/112° DD for the period between 1998 and 2010. The time-series analysis of vegetation greenness is performed during the growing season with a non-parametric method, namely the seasonal Relative Greenness (RG) of spatially accumulated fAPAR. The Global Land Cover map of 2000 and the GlobCover maps of 2005/2006 and 2009 are used as reference data to select study cases only on geographic areas that did not undergo land cover changes during the analysis period. The multi-scale information is integrated at the lowest spatial resolution available, i.e. 1° DD, and the impacts of meteorological drought episodes on seasonal greenness of rainfed crops are assessed at the regional scale. Final results suggest that the agricultural cycle at the regional scale is more correlated with long-standing and uninterrupted small timescale drought conditions that occur prior to vegetation growing season than with isolated and short long-term timescale drought events.

[1]  D. Wilhite,et al.  CHAPfER2UNDERSTANDING THE DROUGHT PHENOMENON:THE ROLE OF DEFINITIONS , 1985 .

[2]  P. Henry,et al.  Geometrical performance of the VEGETATION products , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[3]  Vladimir U. Smakhtin,et al.  Droughts : The impact of semantics and perceptions , 2008 .

[4]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 2009 , 2010, Science.

[5]  Fenguangzhai Song.  CD , 1992 .

[6]  C. Field.  Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaption , 2012 .

[7]  F. Kogan.  Remote sensing of weather impacts on vegetation in non-homogeneous areas , 1990 .

[8]  Niemeyer Stefan,et al.  New Drought Indices , 2008 .

[9]  A. D. Gregorio,et al.  Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual , 2000 .

[10]  H. Eakin,et al.  Local Perspectives on Adaptation to Climate Change : Lessons From Mexico and Argentina , 2006 .

[11]  Neil Leary,et al.  Climate change and adaptation , 2008 .

[12]  R. Burgan,et al.  Monitoring vegetation greenness with satellite data , 1993 .

[13]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. , 2007 .

[14]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[15]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest , 2009, Science.

[16]  Sally Archibald,et al.  Remotely sensed vegetation phenology for describing and predicting the biomes of South Africa , 2011 .

[17]  R. Heim.  A Review of Twentieth-Century Drought Indices Used in the United States , 2002 .

[18]  Gustavo Naumann,et al.  Climate variability in areas of the world with high production of soya beans and corn: its relationship to crop yields , 2012 .

[19]  F. Kogan,et al.  Global Drought Watch from Space , 1997 .

[20]  T. McKee,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF DROUGHT FREQUENCY AND DURATION TO TIME SCALES , 1993 .

[21]  Laurie A. Chisholm,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of MODIS to monitor drought in high biomass ecosystems , 2011 .

[22]  D. Wilhite,et al.  Monitoring the 1996 Drought Using the Standardized Precipitation Index , 1999 .

[23]  T. McKee,et al.  Drought monitoring with multiple time scales , 1995 .

[24]  Achim Röder,et al.  Mediterranean desertification and land degradation: Mapping related land use change syndromes based on satellite observations , 2008 .

[25]  B. Kurnik,et al.  POTENTIAL OF MERIS fAPAR FOR DROUGHT DETECTION , 2008 .

[26]  F. Baret,et al.  LAI and fAPAR CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION. Part 2: validation and comparison with MODIS collection 4 products , 2007 .

[27]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[28]  O. Hagolle,et al.  LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: Principles of the algorithm , 2007 .

[29]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[30]  G. Carbone,et al.  Monitoring agricultural drought for arid and humid regions using multi-sensor remote sensing data , 2010 .

[31]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000 , 2008 .

[32]  L. Ji,et al.  Assessing vegetation response to drought in the northern Great Plains using vegetation and drought indices , 2003 .

[33]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Models of soil moisture dynamics in ecohydrology: A comparative study , 2002 .

[34]  V. Singh,et al.  A review of drought concepts , 2010 .

[35]  Horion Stéphanie,et al.  JRC Experience on the Development of Drought Information Systems , 2012 .

[36]  Anomalías de circulación atmosférica en 500 y 1000 hpa asociada a la sequía producida en la Argentina durante enero de 2003 a marzo de 2004 , 2008 .

[37]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Global and Continental Drought in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century: Severity–Area–Duration Analysis and Temporal Variability of Large-Scale Events , 2009 .