Digital photography for assessment of shoulder range of motion: A novel clinical and research tool

Purpose: Maintenance of a pain-free functional range of motion is the aim of surgery for shoulder trauma. The aim of this study was to show that the range of motion can be accurately assessed using digital photographs. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 17 patients who had undergone surgery for shoulder trauma. Each patient's range of motion was assessed by two physicians and two physiotherapists. Digital photographs were taken of each patient at their functional limit. Photographs were assessed by two physicians and two physiotherapists, and by an external physician who had no previous contact with the patients. Results: Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability trials showed excellent correlation of results. There was no significant difference between observer's results, or between results of physical examination and photographic examination. Conclusions: Digital photography is a viable adjunct to assessment of range of motion of the shoulder. This has positive implications both clinically, and for shoulder research. Level of Evidence: Level 3.

[1]  S. O’Driscoll,et al.  Validation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring joint range of motion. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  A. Carr,et al.  The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  G. Murrell,et al.  Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. , 2001, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[4]  J. Pournaras,et al.  Has the management of shoulder dislocation changed over time? , 2007, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[6]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Are clinical photographs appropriate to determine the maximal range of motion of the knee? , 2010, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[7]  Y. Kalairajah,et al.  Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand – which one to choose? , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[8]  Matthew J. Moncrieff,et al.  Reliability of a digital-photographic-goniometric method for coronal-plane lower limb measurements. , 2009, Journal of sport rehabilitation.

[9]  Joseph L. Fleiss,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments: Fleiss/The Design , 1999 .

[10]  D. Yip,et al.  Difference in outcome of shoulder surgery between workers’ compensation and nonworkers’ compensation populations , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[11]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[12]  I. Marzi,et al.  Midterm results after operatively stabilised shoulder dislocations in elderly patients , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[13]  C. Constant,et al.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  L. Prantl,et al.  The treatment of dislocated humeral head fractures with a new proximal intramedullary nail system , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[15]  C. Rowe,et al.  The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  F. Leung,et al.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture , 2007, International Orthopaedics.