Managing One Master Data - Challenges and Preconditions

– This paper aims to provide a framework of the multidimensional concept of one master data. Preconditions required for successful one master data implementation and usage in large high‐tech companies are presented and related current challenges companies have today are identified., – This paper is qualitative in nature. First, literature was studied to find out the elements of one master data. Second, an interview study was carried out in eight high‐tech companies and in three expert companies., – One master data management framework is the composition of data, processes and information systems. Accordingly, the key challenges related to the data are that the definitions of master data are unclear and overall data quality is poor. Challenges on processes related to managing master data are inadequately defined data ownership, incoherent data management practices and lack of continuous data quality practices. Integrations between applications are fundamental challenge to tackle when constructing an holistic one master data., – Studied companies are vanguards in the area of master data management (MDM), providing good views on topical issues in large companies. This study offers a general view of the topic but not describes special company situations as companies need to adapt the presented concepts for their specific case. Significant implication for future research is that MDM can no more be classified and discussed as only an IT problem but it is a managerial challenge which requires structural changes on mindset how issues are handled., – This paper provides a better understanding over the issues which are impacting on the implementation of one master data. The preconditions of implementing and executing one master data are: an organization wide and defined data model; clear data ownership definitions; pro‐active data quality surveillance; data friendly company culture; the clear definitions of roles and responsibilities; organizational structure that supports data processes; clear data process definitions; support from the managerial level; and information systems that utilize the unified data model. The list of preconditions is wide and it also describes the incoherence of current understanding about MDM. This list helps business managers to understand the extent of the concept and to see that master data management is not only an IT issue., – The existing practical research on master data management is limited and, for example, the general challenges have not been reported earlier. This paper offers practical research on one master data. The obtained results illustrates the extent of the topic and the fact that business relevant data management is not only an IT (application) issue but requires understanding of the data, its utilization in organization and supporting practices such as data ownership.

[1]  Alex Berson,et al.  Master Data Management And Customer Data Integration For A Global Enterprise , 2007 .

[2]  Boris Otto,et al.  Functional Reference Architecture for Corporate Master Data Management , 2009 .

[3]  Xiaoyu Yang,et al.  Product lifecycle information acquisition and management for consumer products , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Tom Breur,et al.  Data quality is everyone's business — Designing quality into your data warehouse — Part 1 , 2009 .

[5]  Anca Ioana Andreescu,et al.  Combining actual trends in software systems for business management , 2008, CompSysTech.

[6]  David Loshin Master Data Management , 2008 .

[7]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Journey to Data Quality , 2006 .

[8]  Steven J. Fenves,et al.  Information sharing and exchange in the context of product lifecycle management: Role of standards , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[9]  Felix Wortmann,et al.  Uncovering Four Strategies to Approach Master Data Management , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Process Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology , 2005 .

[11]  Thomas C. Redman,et al.  Data Quality: The Field Guide , 2001 .

[12]  Anders Haug,et al.  A classification model of ERP system data quality , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[13]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Developments in Practice XXX: Master Data Management: Salvation Or Snake Oil? , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[15]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[16]  Gerhard Knolmayer,et al.  Quality of Material Master Data and Its Effect on the Usefulness of Distributed ERP Systems , 2006, ER.

[17]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[18]  Christine Legner,et al.  Master Data Management for Collaborative Service Processes , 2004 .

[19]  Martha Rogers,et al.  Customer Data Integration: Reaching a Single Version of the Truth (SAS Institute Inc.) , 2006 .

[20]  Li Ma,et al.  Explorations in the use of semantic web technologies for product information management , 2007, WWW '07.

[21]  Constantin Gelu Apostol Enterprise Master Data Management Trends and Solutions , 2007 .

[22]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement , 2009, CSUR.

[23]  Laura M. Haas,et al.  Information integration in the enterprise , 2008, CACM.

[24]  Steve Tuck Is MDM the route to the Holy Grail? , 2008 .