Effectiveness of odour repellents on red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a field test

Chemical repellents are promoted as a method to reduce ungulate–vehicle collisions and ungulate browsing damages to agricultural and forestry resources. We tested the effectiveness of two odour repellents (Mota FL and Wolf Urine) on the foraging behaviour and area avoidance of free-ranging roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus). The effects of the repellents were assessed by comparing deer visitation rates to sand arenas before and after application of repellents and visitation rates to control arenas. Neither of the tested products reduced deer visitation rates. Rapid habituation to olfactory stimuli and lack of sensitivity to predator odours may explain the ineffectiveness of the repellents to alter the behaviour of the deer. The results indicate that the tested products have no effects on roe deer and red deer behaviour and suggest that the effectiveness of the chemical area repellents as a measure to reduce deer–vehicle collision risk and browsing damages is questionable.

[1]  E. Gese,et al.  Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range , 2007 .

[2]  HARRY P. ANDREASSEN,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SCENT-MARKING, FOREST CLEARING, AND SUPPLEMENTAL FEEDING ON MOOSE–TRAIN COLLISIONS , 2005 .

[3]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Use of winter habitat by roe deer at a northern latitude where Eurasian lynx are present , 2007 .

[4]  Gino J. D'Angelo,et al.  Evaluation of Wildlife Warning Reflectors for Altering White-Tailed Deer Behavior Along Roadways , 2006 .

[5]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Effects of Road Fencing on Population Persistence , 2004 .

[6]  Patrick Tracy McGowen,et al.  Cost–Benefit Analyses of Mitigation Measures Aimed at Reducing Collisions with Large Ungulates in the United States and Canada: a Decision Support Tool , 2009 .

[7]  M. Grigione,et al.  Lack of response of an open-habitat ungulate to the presence of predator urine , 2008 .

[8]  R. Apfelbach,et al.  The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: A review of field and laboratory studies , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  J. Berger,et al.  Recolonizing Carnivores and Naïve Prey: Conservation Lessons from Pleistocene Extinctions , 2001, Science.

[10]  A. Sibbald,et al.  Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance , 2008 .

[11]  B. Iuell.  Wildlife and Traffic: A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions , 2003 .

[12]  Xin Yi,et al.  DEER-VEHICLE CRASH COUNTERMEASURE TOOLBOX: A DECISION AND CHOICE RESOURCE , 2004 .

[13]  E. Hazebroek,et al.  Ungulate Traffic Collisions in Europe , 1996 .

[14]  Dale L. Nolte,et al.  Comparison of active ingredients and delivery systems in deer repellents , 2001 .

[15]  Marianne Ujvári,et al.  Effectiveness of acoustic road markings in reducing deer-vehicle collisions: a behavioural study , 2004, Wildlife Biology.

[16]  Aksel Bo Madsen,et al.  Effectiveness of Wildlife Warning Reflectors in Reducing Deer-Vehicle Collisions: A Behavioral Study , 1998 .

[17]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[18]  Jimmy D. Taylor,et al.  Deer Responses to Repellent Stimuli , 2009, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[19]  P. Theil,et al.  SEASONAL CHANGES AND ACTIVITY-DEPENDENT VARIATION IN HEART RATE OF ROE DEER , 2004 .

[20]  W. Lutz.  Ergebnisse der Anwendung eines sogenannten Duftzaunes zur Vermeidung von Wildverlusten durch den Straßenverkehr nach Gehege- und Freilandorientierungen , 1994, Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft.