Networked Flow: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration in Educational

Supporting creative collaboration in the classroom is considered an important objective by current education research, as growing evidence suggests that this practice is linked with the quality of learning and the development of problem solving skills. Drawing on recent advances in group creativity research, social cognition and network science, we propose a theoretical framework for studying creative collaboration that integrates the concepts of group flow and social presence. Our key hypothesis is that in order for a group to enter the creative state of flow, members must be able to develop a "we-intention", in which the actions of the individuals and those of the collective are merged (social presence). According to our model, this is a staged process, beginning with the co-construction of a shared frame within the group and culminating with the creation of a novel artefact or concept. A further assumption is that the emergence of such optimal group state is associated with structural changes in the dynamics of group interaction, which can be effectively investigated using social network analysis techniques.

[1]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[2]  R. Spencer.  Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration , 2008 .

[3]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[4]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[5]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[6]  J. Searle.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[7]  Florence R. Sullivan.  Serious and Playful Inquiry: Epistemological Aspects of Collaborative Creativity , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Gino Cattani,et al.  A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Anna Spagnolli,et al.  An ethnographic, action-based approach to human experience in virtual environments , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  G. Riva,et al.  From intention to action: The role of presence , 2011 .

[11]  M. Bassi,et al.  Education, Learning, and Cultural Transmission , 2011 .

[12]  Peter A. Gloor,et al.  Correlating temporal communication patterns of the Eclipse open source community with performance and creativity , 2007, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[13]  J. Egbert.  A Study of Flow Theory in the Foreign Language Classroom , 2003 .

[14]  Lori A. Custodero,et al.  Seeking Challenge, Finding Skill: Flow Experience and Music Education , 2002 .

[15]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[16]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[17]  Giacomo Rizzolatti,et al.  So quel che fai : il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio , 2006 .

[18]  Go With Their Flow: How Flow Theory Can Help Practitioners to Intrinsically Motivate Children to be Physically Active , 1998 .

[19]  A. Pentland,et al.  The Virtual Mirror - Reflecting on Social and Psychological Self to Increase Organizational Creativity , 2010 .

[20]  Alayne Armstrong.  The Fragility of Group Flow: The Experiences of Two Small Groups in a Middle School Mathematics Classroom. , 2008 .

[21]  Elvis Mazzoni,et al.  Monitoring Activity in E-Learning: A Quantitative Model Based on Web Tracking and Social Network Analysis , 2010 .

[22]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  IMMERSION/EMERSION: Presence in hybrid environments , 2006 .

[23]  SpagnolliAnna,et al.  An ethnographic, action-based approach to human experience in virtual environments , 2003 .

[24]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[25]  Personal Learning Environment e Lifelong Learning: un’ indagine descrittiva delle dinamiche interattive in un social network , 2009 .

[26]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[27]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[28]  T. Anguera,et al.  From Communication to Presence: Cognition, emotions and culture towards the ultimate communicative experience , 2006 .

[29]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[30]  Anna Craft,et al.  Creativity in Schools : Tensions and Dilemmas , 2005 .

[31]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration , 2003 .

[32]  Magnus Haake,et al.  Social and visual style in virtual pedagogical agents , 2005 .

[33]  V. John-Steiner,et al.  Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework , 1996 .

[34]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[35]  Claudia E. Nunn,et al.  Discussion in the College Classroom: Triangulating Observational and Survey Results. , 1996 .

[36]  A. Damasio.  Self comes to mind : constructing the conscious brain , 2010 .

[37]  Mark Elliott.  Stigmergic Collaboration: The Evolution of Group Work: Introduction , 2006 .

[38]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Jacob L. Mey,et al.  Humane Interfaces: Questions of Method and Practice in Cognitive Technology , 1999 .

[41]  M. Bassi,et al.  Psychological Selection and Optimal Experience Across Cultures: Social Empowerment through Personal Growth , 2010 .

[42]  David J. Shernoff,et al.  Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. , 2003 .

[43]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[44]  Anneli Eteläpelto,et al.  The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in a long-term learning community , 2008 .

[45]  Judy A. Abbott,et al.  “Blinking Out” and “Having the Touch” , 2000 .

[46]  P.-P. Grasse.  La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chezBellicositermes natalensis etCubitermes sp. la théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d'interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs , 1959, Insectes Sociaux.

[47]  D. O’Keefe.  Persuasion , 1990, The Handbook of Communication Skills.

[48]  J. Egbert.  A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom , 2003 .

[49]  B. Davis,et al.  Understanding Learning Systems: Mathematics Education and Complexity Science. , 2003 .

[50]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  A Place for Presence. Understanding the Human Involvement in Mediated Interactive Environments , 2005, PsychNology J..

[51]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  On feeling (the) present: An evolutionary account of the sense of presence in physical and electronically-mediated environments , 2010 .