Resolution of Construction Disputes: A Review of Current Methodologies

Construction projects are increasingly complex, resulting in complex contract documents. Complex construction can likewise often result in complex disputes, which predominantly arise from the intricacy and magnitude of the work, multiple prime contracting parties, poorly prepared and/or executed contract documents, inadequate planning, financial issues, and communication problems. Any one of these factors can derail a project and lead to complicated litigation or arbitration, increased costs, and a breakdown in the parties’ communication and relationship. This paper reviews the current methodologies for preventing and/or resolving construction conflicts. It is not meant to be an exhaustive review of each and every process, but rather to give the reader an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each process when determining which one is right for a particular situation.

[1]  Dennis L. Dossett,et al.  Goal Setting Participation and Leader Supportiveness Effects on Performance. , 1983 .

[2]  Robert Elias,et al.  Conflict and power , 1993 .

[3]  Thomas J. Stipanowich,et al.  Reconstructing Construction Law: Reality and Reform in a Transactional System , 1998 .

[4]  M. Kamil Kazan,et al.  CULTURE AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK , 1997 .

[5]  A. Leo Levin,et al.  Court-Annexed Arbitration , 1983 .

[6]  B B Bramble,et al.  RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES TO AVOID CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS , 1995 .

[7]  William H. Ross.  Situational Factors and Alternative Dispute Resolution , 1988 .

[8]  H. Jay Folberg,et al.  Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[9]  Henry S. Farber,et al.  Splitting-the-Difference in Interest Arbitration , 1981 .

[10]  Asce.  Avoiding and Resolving Disputes during Construction : Successful Practices and Guidelines , 1991 .

[11]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  An Evaluation of Mediation and Early Neutral Evaluation Under the Civil Justice Reform Act , 1996 .

[12]  Richard E. Speidel,et al.  Federal arbitration law : agreements, awards, and remedies under the Federal Arbitration Act , 1994 .

[13]  Thomas J. Stipanowich.  Beyond Arbitration: Innovation and Evolution in the United States Construction Industry , 1996 .

[14]  E Kay,et al.  Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  D. Mosley,et al.  Partnering in the construction industry: Win‐win strategic management in action , 1991 .

[16]  Andrew Caiger,et al.  Lawyers and Arbitration: The Juridification of Construction Disputes , 1993 .

[17]  Roger Schwarz,et al.  The Skilled Facilitator , 1994 .

[18]  Thomas J. Stipanowich.  Contract and Conflict Management , 2001 .

[19]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  Developing construction claims for arbitration: Two arbitrators' viewpoint , 2000 .

[20]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated woods workers. , 1975 .

[21]  E. W. Larson,et al.  Partnering on construction projects: a study of the relationship between partnering activities and project success , 1997 .

[22]  Penny Brooker,et al.  Perceptions of alternative dispute resolution as constraints upon its use in the UK construction industry , 1997 .

[23]  Jerold S. Auerbach,et al.  Justice without Law? Resolving Disputes without Lawyers , 1984 .

[24]  F. H. “Bud” Griffis.  ADR, TQM, Partnering, and Other Management Fantasies , 1992 .

[25]  Kathleen M. O'Connor,et al.  Ombudspersons or Peers? The effect of third-party expertise and recommendations on negotiation , 1999 .

[26]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  MEDIATION AS AN AID TO FACE SAVING IN NEGOTIATION , 1970 .

[27]  Solly Angel,et al.  Isn't There a Better Way? , 2004 .

[28]  Onur Behzat Tokdemir.  Using case-based reasoning to predict the outcome of construction litigation , 1999 .

[29]  Penny Brooker.  Survey of construction lawyers' attitudes and practice in the use of ADR in contractors' disputes , 1999 .

[30]  Thomas J. Stipanowich.  At the cutting edge: conflict avoidance and resolution in the US construction industry , 1997 .

[31]  William H. Ross,et al.  APPEARANCES DO COUNT: THE EFFECTS OF OUTCOMES AND EXPLANATIONS ON DISPUTANT FAIRNESS JUDGMENTS AND SUPERVISORY EVALUATIONS , 1997 .

[32]  James F. Henry,et al.  The Manager's Guide to Resolving Legal Disputes: Better Results Without Litigation , 1985 .

[33]  Stephen LaTour,et al.  Procedural Justice as Fairness , 1974 .

[34]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  The Mediation Process , 1987 .

[35]  Virginia Fairweather,et al.  Construction Claims: Prevention and Resolution, 2nd Ed. , 1993 .

[36]  Sammie D. Guy,et al.  Construction Claims: Prevention and resolution , 1992 .

[37]  Darrick M. Mix.  ADR in the Construction Industry: Continuing the Development of a More Efficient Dispute Resolution Mechanism , 1997 .

[38]  Michael Zander,et al.  The State of Justice , 2000 .

[39]  Della Clarke,et al.  The Design of Education (2nd Ed.). Cyril O. Houle (1996). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. , 1996 .

[40]  Herbert H. Meyer,et al.  Participation and the Appraisal System , 1966 .

[41]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATION , 1992 .

[42]  Thomas B. Treacy.  USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY , 1995 .

[43]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Strategic choice in mediation , 1986 .

[44]  G. Latham,et al.  A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations , 1975 .

[45]  Warren E. Burger.  AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE STUDY ON PATHS TO A "BETTER WAY": LITIGATION, ALTERNATIVES, AND ACCOMMODATION , 1986 .