Development and validation of a method to record electrophysiological responses in direct acoustic cochlear implant subjects

ABSTRACT Acoustic hearing implants, such as direct acoustic cochlear implants (DACIs), can be used to treat profound mixed hearing loss. Electrophysiological responses in DACI subjects are of interest to confirm auditory processing intra‐operatively, and to assist DACI fitting postoperatively. We present two related studies, focusing on DACI artifacts and electrophysiological measurements in DACI subjects, respectively. In the first study we aimed to characterize DACI artifacts, to study the feasibility of measuring frequency‐specific electrophysiological responses in DACI subjects. Measurements of DACI artifacts were collected in a cadaveric head to disentangle possible DACI artifact sources and compared to a constructed DACI artifact template. It is shown that for moderate stimulation levels, DACI artifacts are mainly dominated by the artifact from the radio frequency (RF) communication signal, that can be modeled if the RF encoding protocol is known. In a second study, the feasibility of measuring intra‐operative responses, without applying the RF artifact models, in DACI subjects is investigated. Auditory steady‐state and brainstem responses were measured intra‐operatively in three DACI subjects, immediately after implantation, to confirm proper DACI functioning and coupling to the inner ear. Intra‐operative responses could be measured in two of the three tested subjects. Absence of intra‐operative responses in the third subject can possibly be explained by the hearing loss, attenuation of intra‐operative responses, the difference between electrophysiological and behavioral threshold, and a temporary threshold shift due to the DACI surgery. In conclusion, RF artifacts can be modeled, such that electrophysiological responses to frequency‐specific stimuli could possibly be measured in DACI subjects, and intra‐operative responses in DACI subjects can be obtained. HighlightsElectrophysiological responses could confirm DACI coupling intra‐operatively.RF artifacts are dominant and can be modeled based on the RF encoding protocol.Electrophysiological responses could be obtained intra‐operatively.

[1]  Ad F. M. Snik,et al.  Amplification Options for Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  H. Hotelling The Generalization of Student’s Ratio , 1931 .

[3]  Alan Kan,et al.  Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users , 2017, Trends in hearing.

[4]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Multicenter Study With a Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  G. Gates,et al.  High-Frequency Electrostimulation Hearing after Mastoidectomy , 1989, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  T. Lenarz,et al.  First Clinical Experiences With a Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulator in Comparison to Preoperative Fitted Conventional Hearing Aids , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  G. Plourde The Effects of Propofol on the 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response and on the Electroencephalogram in Humans , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  J. Wouters,et al.  Transient and Steady State Auditory Responses With Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[9]  S. Hickey,et al.  Measurement of drill-generated noise levels during ear surgery , 1991, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[10]  S. Arlinger,et al.  Peroperative temporary threshold shift in ear surgery. An electrocochleographic study. , 1977, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  Chin-Tuan Tan,et al.  A New Software Tool to Optimize Frequency Table Selection for Cochlear Implants , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  J. Verhey,et al.  40-Hz multiple auditory steady-state responses to narrow-band chirps in sedated and anaesthetized infants. , 2014, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[13]  E. Karataş,et al.  Contralateral Normal Ear after Mastoid Surgery: Evaluation by Otoacoustic Emissions (Mastoid Drilling and Hearing Loss) , 2006, ORL.

[14]  M. Scherg,et al.  Intracerebral Sources of Human Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2004, Brain Topography.

[15]  Unnikrishnan Nair,et al.  Post operative sensorineural hearing loss after middle ear surgery , 2004, Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India.

[16]  Yves Perriard,et al.  Design of a Semi-Implantable Hearing Device for Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  A Comparative Study on Speech in Noise Understanding with a Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant in Subjects with Severe to Profound Mixed Hearing Loss , 2014, Audiology and Neurotology.

[18]  Gilles Plourde,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Enflurane/N2 O on the 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response Versus the Auditory Middle-Latency Response1 , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  Rudolf Häusler,et al.  A Novel Implantable Hearing System with Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation , 2008, Audiology and Neurotology.

[20]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Improved Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady-State Response Thresholds in Humans , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[21]  P Fiset,et al.  Effect of Isoflurane on the Auditory Steady‐state Response and on Consciousness in Human Volunteers , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[22]  T. Lenarz,et al.  Clinical Results After Stapedotomy: A Comparison Between the Erbium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser and the Conventional Technique , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[23]  Roy Levy,et al.  Understanding the heterogeneity of BPD symptoms through latent class analysis: initial results and clinical correlates among inner-city substance users. , 2010, Psychological assessment.

[24]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Measurement and Analysis of Feedback and Nonlinearities for the Codacs Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant , 2017, IEEE Access.

[25]  O. Hallén,et al.  Peroperative drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[26]  C. Strauss,et al.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses , 2017, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[27]  S. Arlinger,et al.  Drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[28]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Acoustic Hearing Implants for Mixed Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[29]  Richard R. McNeer,et al.  Influence of Auditory Stimulation Rates on Evoked Potentials during General Anesthesia: Relation between the Transient Auditory Middle-latency Response and the 40-Hz Auditory Steady State Response , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[30]  A. Büchner,et al.  Indication of direct acoustical cochlea stimulation in comparison to cochlear implants , 2016, Hearing Research.

[31]  T W Picton,et al.  Human Auditory Steady‐State Response During General Anesthesia , 1990, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[32]  S. Black The use of research. , 1975, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[33]  Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects , 2017, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[34]  A. Snik,et al.  Intraoperative Auditory Steady State Response Measurements During Vibrant Soundbridge Middle Ear Implantation in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss: Preliminary Results , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.