Distinguishing Between Latent Classes and Continuous Factors with Categorical Outcomes: Class Invariance of Parameters of Factor Mixture Models

Factor mixture models are latent variable models with categorical and continuous latent variables that can be used as a model-based approach to clustering. A previous article covered the results of a simulation study showing that in the absence of model violations, it is usually possible to choose the correct model when fitting a series of models with different numbers of classes and factors within class. The response format in the first study was limited to normally distributed outcomes. This article has 2 main goals, first, to replicate parts of the first study with 5-point Likert scale and binary outcomes, and second, to address the issue of testing class invariance of thresholds and loadings. Testing for class invariance of parameters is important in the context of measurement invariance and when using mixture models to approximate nonnormal distributions. Results show that it is possible to discriminate between latent class models and factor models even if responses are categorical. Comparing models with and without class-specific parameters can lead to incorrectly accepting parameter invariance if the compared models differ substantially with respect to the number of estimated parameters. The simulation study is complemented with an illustration of a factor mixture analysis of 10 binary depression items obtained from a female subsample of the Virginia Twin Registry.

[1]  Daniel J Bauer,et al.  The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[2]  Jay Magidson,et al.  Latent class models for classification , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[3]  B. Muthén,et al.  Finite Mixture Modeling with Mixture Outcomes Using the EM Algorithm , 1999, Biometrics.

[4]  S. Sclove Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis , 1987 .

[5]  K. Bucholz,et al.  Evaluation of ADHD typology in three contrasting samples: a latent class approach. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[6]  M. Neale,et al.  Distinguishing Between Latent Classes and Continuous Factors: Resolution by Maximum Likelihood? , 2006, Multivariate behavioral research.

[7]  H. Akaike Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[8]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[9]  Richard Goldstein Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences , 1998 .

[10]  Susan L Smalley,et al.  Temperament and character profiles and the dopamine D4 receptor gene in ADHD. , 2005, The American journal of psychiatry.

[11]  B. Muthén,et al.  Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[12]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[13]  M. Neale,et al.  Problems with using sum scores for estimating variance components: contamination and measurement noninvariance. , 2005, Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[14]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[15]  P. Deb Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .

[16]  Gitta H. Lubke,et al.  On the relationship between sources of within- and between-group differences and measurement invariance in the common factor model , 2003 .

[17]  Roger E. Millsap,et al.  Assessing Factorial Invariance in Ordered-Categorical Measures , 2004 .

[18]  P. Sebel,et al.  Dependence of explicit and implicit memory on hypnotic state in trauma patients. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[19]  A. Pickles,et al.  Natural categories or fundamental dimensions: On carving nature at the joints and the rearticulation of psychopathology , 2003, Development and Psychopathology.

[20]  Yiu-Fai Yung,et al.  Finite mixtures in confirmatory factor-analysis models , 1997 .

[21]  R. Kendell Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed , 1980 .

[22]  M. Neale,et al.  Implications of absence of measurement invariance for detecting sex limitation and genotype by environment interaction. , 2004, Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[23]  G. Lubke,et al.  Viewing Spearman's hypothesis from the perspective of multigroup PCA: a comment on Schonemann's criticism , 2001 .

[24]  P. Sebel,et al.  Awareness and different forms of memory in trauma anaesthesia , 2000, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[25]  B. Muthén,et al.  Applying Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Models for Continuous Outcomes to Likert Scale Data Complicates Meaningful Group Comparisons , 2004 .

[26]  W. Meredith Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[27]  H. Bozdogan Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[28]  C. Dolan,et al.  Investigating Spearman's Hypothesis by Means of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2000, Multivariate behavioral research.

[29]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[30]  D. Rubin,et al.  Testing the number of components in a normal mixture , 2001 .

[31]  Stephen J Tueller,et al.  Evaluation of Structural Equation Mixture Models: Parameter Estimates and Correct Class Assignment , 2010, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.

[32]  Gerhard Arminger,et al.  Mixtures of conditional mean- and covariance-structure models , 1999 .

[33]  A. F. Smith,et al.  Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions , 1986 .

[34]  K. Kendler,et al.  A population-based twin study of lifetime major depression in men and women. , 1999, Archives of general psychiatry.

[35]  M. Goldman,et al.  Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshmen college students. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[36]  Bengt,et al.  Latent Variable Analysis With Categorical Outcomes : Multiple-Group And Growth Modeling In Mplus , 2002 .

[37]  J. Swanson,et al.  Subtypes versus severity differences in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the Northern Finnish Birth Cohort. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[38]  C. Kerssens,et al.  Memory Function during Propofol and Alfentanil Anesthesia: Predictive Value of Individual Differences , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[39]  Conor V Dolan,et al.  Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance. , 2003, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[40]  S. Reise,et al.  Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. , 1997 .

[41]  Sasha J. Carr,et al.  Modeling population heterogeneity in appearance- and performance-enhancing drug (APED) use: applications of mixture modeling in 400 regular APED users. , 2007, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[42]  P. Sebel,et al.  Memory Formation during General Anesthesia for Emergency Cesarean Sections , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[43]  Han L. J. van der Maas,et al.  Fitting multivariage normal finite mixtures subject to structural equation modeling , 1998 .