GrapevineXL reliably predicts multi-annual dynamics of vine water status, berry growth, and sugar accumulation in vineyards

Abstract Climate and water availability greatly affect each season’s grape yield and quality. Using models to accurately predict environment impacts on fruit productivity and quality is a huge challenge. We calibrated and validated the functional-structural model, GrapevineXL, with a data set including grapevine seasonal midday stem water potential (Ψxylem), berry dry weight (DW), fresh weight (FW), and sugar concentration per volume ([Sugar]) for a wine grape cultivar (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Franc) in field conditions over 13 years in Bordeaux, France. Our results showed that the model could make a fair prediction of seasonal Ψxylem and good-to-excellent predictions of berry DW, FW, [Sugar] and leaf gas exchange responses to predawn and midday leaf water potentials under diverse environmental conditions with 14 key parameters. By running virtual experiments to mimic climate change, an advanced veraison (i.e. the onset of ripening) of 14 and 28 days led to significant decreases of berry FW by 2.70% and 3.22%, clear increases of berry [Sugar] by 2.90% and 4.29%, and shortened ripening duration in 8 out of 13 simulated years, respectively. Moreover, the impact of the advanced veraison varied with seasonal patterns of climate and soil water availability. Overall, the results showed that the GrapevineXL model can predict plant water use and berry growth in field conditions and could serve as a valuable tool for designing sustainable vineyard management strategies to cope with climate change.

[1]  J. C. Herrera,et al.  Model-assisted ideotyping reveals trait syndromes to adapt viticulture to a drier climate , 2022, Plant physiology.

[2]  Xinguang Wei,et al.  Prediction of the Maturity of Greenhouse Grapes Based on Imaging Technology , 2022, Plant phenomics.

[3]  J. C. Herrera,et al.  Stomatal responses in grapevine become increasingly more tolerant to low water potentials throughout the growing season. , 2021, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[4]  G. Gambetta,et al.  Global warming and wine quality: are we close to the tipping point? , 2021, OENO One.

[5]  B. Holzapfel,et al.  Simulating organ biomass variability and carbohydrate distribution in perennial fruit crops: a comparison between the common assimilate pool and phloem carbohydrate transport models , 2021, in silico Plants.

[6]  M. Keller,et al.  Cuticle and skin cell walls have common and unique roles in grape berry splitting , 2021, Horticulture research.

[7]  J. Teixeira,et al.  Assessing predawn leaf water potential based on hyperspectral data and pigment’s concentration of Vitis vinifera L. in the Douro Wine Region , 2021 .

[8]  Z. Dai,et al.  Adapting Wine Grape Ripening to Global Change Requires a Multi-Trait Approach , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[9]  C. Romieu,et al.  Transcripts switched off at the stop of phloem unloading highlight the energy efficiency of sugar import in the ripening V. vinifera fruit , 2021, bioRxiv.

[10]  L. Williams,et al.  Functional hydraulic sectoring in grapevines as evidenced by sap flow, dye infusion, leaf removal and micro-computed tomography. , 2021, AoB PLANTS.

[11]  M. Bartlett,et al.  Temperature and evaporative demand drive variation in stomatal and hydraulic traits across grape cultivars. , 2020, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  I. Cortázar-Atauri,et al.  Adaptation to climate change by determining grapevine cultivar differences using temperature-based phenology models , 2020 .

[13]  S. Jansen,et al.  An increase in xylem embolism resistance of grapevine leaves during the growing season is coordinated with stomatal regulation, turgor loss point, and intervessel pit membranes. , 2020, The New phytologist.

[14]  A. Carminati,et al.  Soil Rather Than Xylem Vulnerability Controls Stomatal Response to Drought. , 2020, Trends in plant science.

[15]  M. Trought,et al.  Quantifying the seasonal variations in grapevine yield components based on pre- and post-flowering weather conditions , 2020, OENO One.

[16]  B. Cook,et al.  Diversity buffers winegrowing regions from climate change losses , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  G. Louarn,et al.  A Functional-Structural Plant Model that Simulates Whole- Canopy Gas-Exchange of Grapevine Plants (Vitis Vinifera L.) Under Different Training Systems. , 2019, Annals of botany.

[18]  D. Pernet,et al.  Modeling Stem Water Potential by Separating the Effects of Soil Water Availability and Climatic Conditions on Water Status in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[19]  A. Destrac-Irvine,et al.  An Update on the Impact of Climate Change in Viticulture and Potential Adaptations , 2019, Agronomy.

[20]  J. J. Cancela,et al.  Discrimination ability of leaf and stem water potential at different times of the day through a meta-analysis in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) , 2019, Agricultural Water Management.

[21]  D. Inzé,et al.  Source-Sink Regulation in Crops under Water Deficit. , 2019, Trends in plant science.

[22]  V. Sadras,et al.  Interactive effects of high temperature and water deficit on Malbec grapevines , 2019, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research.

[23]  E. Gomès,et al.  Impact of grapevine age on water status and productivity of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling , 2019, European Journal of Agronomy.

[24]  M. Chelle,et al.  HydroShoot: a functional-structural plant model for simulating hydraulic structure, gas and energy exchange dynamics of complex plant canopies under water deficit - application to grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) , 2019, bioRxiv.

[25]  S. Delrot,et al.  Modelling grape growth in relation to whole-plant carbon and water fluxes , 2018, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  J. Sperry,et al.  A stomatal control model based on optimization of carbon gain versus hydraulic risk predicts aspen sapling responses to drought. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[27]  S. Delrot,et al.  Dissecting the rootstock control of scion transpiration using model-assisted analyses in grapevine , 2018, Tree physiology.

[28]  B. Choat,et al.  Triggers of tree mortality under drought , 2018, Nature.

[29]  S. Delrot,et al.  A 3-D functional–structural grapevine model that couples the dynamics of water transport with leaf gas exchange , 2018, Annals of botany.

[30]  C. van Leeuwen,et al.  Drought will not leave your glass empty: Low risk of hydraulic failure revealed by long-term drought observations in world’s top wine regions , 2018, Science Advances.

[31]  F. Mencarelli,et al.  Grapevine quality: A multiple choice issue , 2017 .

[32]  H. Medrano,et al.  Allometric relationships for estimating vegetative and reproductive biomass in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) , 2017 .

[33]  T. Lacombe,et al.  Grapevine phenology in France: from past observations to future evolutions in the context of climate change , 2017 .

[34]  J. Hunter Plant Spacing Implications for Grafted Grapevine I. Soil Characteristics, Root Growth, Dry Matter Partitioning, Dry Matter Composition and Soil Utilisation , 2017 .

[35]  C. Lovisolo,et al.  Factors influencing stomatal conductance in response to water availability in grapevine: a meta-analysis. , 2017, Physiologia plantarum.

[36]  Stephen W Pacala,et al.  Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  H. Boldingh,et al.  Effect of Postharvest Defoliation on Carbon and Nitrogen Resources of High-Yielding Sauvignon blanc Grapevines , 2016, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[38]  B. Cook,et al.  Climate change decouples drought from early wine grape harvests in France , 2016 .

[39]  Jean Lévêque,et al.  Ecophysiological Modeling of Grapevine Water Stress in Burgundy Terroirs by a Machine-Learning Approach , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[40]  P. Darriet,et al.  The Impact of Climate Change on Viticulture and Wine Quality* , 2016, Journal of Wine Economics.

[41]  M. Keller,et al.  Grape Berry Transpiration Is Determined by Vapor Pressure Deficit, Cuticular Conductance, and Berry Size , 2015, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[42]  Mercedes Valdés-Vela,et al.  Stem water potential estimation of drip-irrigated early-maturing peach trees under Mediterranean conditions , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[43]  K. Steppe,et al.  Variable hydraulic resistances and their impact on plant drought response modelling. , 2015, Tree physiology.

[44]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Modelling the coordination of the controls of stomatal aperture, transpiration, leaf growth, and abscisic acid: update and extension of the Tardieu-Davies model. , 2015, Journal of Experimental Botany.

[45]  Camille Bénard,et al.  In-silico analysis of water and carbon relations under stress conditions. A multi-scale perspective centered on fruit , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[46]  A. Destrac-Irvine,et al.  Impact of soil texture and water availability on the hydraulic control of plant and grape-berry development , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[47]  Hongbin Liu,et al.  General models for estimating daily global solar radiation for different solar radiation zones in mainland China , 2013 .

[48]  P. Marquet,et al.  Climate change, wine, and conservation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  B. Loveys,et al.  Expression of ABA synthesis and metabolism genes under different irrigation strategies and atmospheric VPDs is associated with stomatal conductance in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv Cabernet Sauvignon) , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[50]  G. Louarn,et al.  A leaf gas exchange model that accounts for intra-canopy variability by considering leaf nitrogen content and local acclimation to radiation in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). , 2012, Plant, cell & environment.

[51]  M. Shukla,et al.  Estimating Midday Leaf and Stem Water Potentials of Mature Pecan Trees from Soil Water Content and Climatic Parameters , 2012 .

[52]  Annelies Baert,et al.  Functional unfold principal component analysis for automatic plant-based stress detection in grapevine. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[53]  Patricia Sánchez-de-Miguel,et al.  Estimation of vineyard leaf area by linear regression. , 2011 .

[54]  R. Bramley,et al.  Vineyard variability in Marlborough, New Zealand: characterising spatial and temporal changes in fruit composition and juice quality in the vineyard , 2011 .

[55]  Eric Duchêne,et al.  The challenge of adapting grapevine varieties to climate change. , 2010 .

[56]  B. Andrieu,et al.  Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[57]  P. Struik,et al.  C3 and C4 photosynthesis models: An overview from the perspective of crop modelling , 2009 .

[58]  Benjamin Bois,et al.  Vine water status is a key factor in grape ripening and vintage quality for red Bordeaux wine. How can it be assessed for vineyard management purposes , 2009 .

[59]  Olivier Jacquet,et al.  ASYNCHRONOUS DYNAMICS OF GRAPEVINE (VITIS VINIFERA) MATURATION: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR A MODELLING APPROACH , 2009 .

[60]  Shaohua Li,et al.  Model-based analysis of sugar accumulation in response to source-sink ratio and water supply in grape (Vitis vinifera) berries. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[61]  Gerhard Buck-Sorlin,et al.  The rule-based language XL and the modelling environment GroIMP illustrated with simulated tree competition. , 2008, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[62]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Predicting the decline in daily maximum transpiration rate of two pine stands during drought based on constant minimum leaf water potential and plant hydraulic conductance. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[63]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[64]  D. Smart,et al.  Importance of internal hydraulic redistribution for prolonging the lifespan of roots in dry soil. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[65]  Joseph D. Bowden,et al.  The influence of temperature on within-canopy acclimation and variation in leaf photosynthesis: spatial acclimation to microclimate gradients among climatically divergent Acer rubrum L. genotypes. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[66]  Mark A. Matthews,et al.  Water deficits accelerate ripening and induce changes in gene expression regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in grape berries , 2007, Planta.

[67]  Jérémie Lecoeur,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical reconstruction model of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) simulating canopy structure variability within and between cultivar/training system pairs. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[68]  M. Matthews,et al.  Xylem structure and connectivity in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) shoots provides a passive mechanism for the spread of bacteria in grape plants. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[69]  Eric Lebon,et al.  Branch development controls leaf area dynamics in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) growing in drying soil. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[70]  M. Plummer,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC , 2006 .

[71]  M. A. White,et al.  Climate Change and Global Wine Quality , 2005 .

[72]  M. M. Chaves,et al.  Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[73]  Jaume Flexas,et al.  Effect of water stress on partitioning of 14C-labelled photosynthates in Vitis vinifera. , 2004, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[74]  Hans R. Schultz,et al.  Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near‐isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field‐grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought , 2003 .

[75]  Vincent Dumas,et al.  Modelling the seasonal dynamics of the soil water balance of vineyards. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[76]  L. Williams,et al.  Correlations among Predawn Leaf, Midday Leaf, and Midday Stem Water Potential and their Correlations with other Measures of Soil and Plant Water Status in Vitis vinifera , 2002 .

[77]  Cornelis van Leeuwen,et al.  Stem Water Potential is a Sensitive Indicator of Grapevine Water Status , 2001 .

[78]  M. Génard,et al.  A biophysical model of fruit growth: simulation of seasonal and diurnal dynamics of mass , 1998 .

[79]  J. Sperry,et al.  Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? : answers from a model. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[80]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[81]  W. R. Gardner DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF WATER AVAILABILITY TO PLANTS , 1960 .

[82]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[83]  Nathan G. McDowell,et al.  Update on Mechanisms of Vegetation Mortality Mechanisms Linking Drought , Hydraulics , Carbon Metabolism , and Vegetation Mortality 1 [ W ] , 2011 .

[84]  Cornelis van Leeuwen,et al.  Influence of Climate, Soil, and Cultivar on Terroir , 2004, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[85]  Hervé Cochard,et al.  Whole tree hydraulic conductance and water loss regulation in Quercus during drought: evidence for stomatal control of embolism? , 1996 .

[86]  S. Rambal,et al.  Influence of Water Stress on Grapevines Growing in the Field: From Leaf to Whole-Plant Response , 1993 .