Hybrid probabilistic-possibilistic approach for capacity credit evaluation of demand response considering both exogenous and endogenous uncertainties

Abstract As a featured smart-grid technology, demand response (DR) provides utility companies with unprecedented flexibility to improve the reliability of electricity service in future power systems. However, due to the uncertainties arising from the demand side, the extent to which DR can be utilized for capacity support poses a major question to the utilities. To address this issue, this paper proposes a new methodological framework to assess the potential reliability value of DR in smart grids. The framework is established on the concept of capacity credit (CC), and it accommodates different types of uncertainties (i.e., probabilistic and possibilistic) accrued from physical and anthropogenic factors in DR programs. The capability of DR during operation is considered as a synthesized result of multiple facets, i.e., users’ load characteristics, participation levels, and load recoveries, and different models are developed to represent each component. To characterize the stochastic nature of demand responsiveness, the fuzzy theory is introduced, and possibilistic models are proposed to describe the human-related uncertainties under incomplete information. In addition, considering that in reality, DR operation could affect the comfort of customers, the dynamics of demand-side participation have also been incorporated in our study, in which two utility-based indices are defined to quantify the effect of such interdependency. Using a probabilistic propagation technique, the different types of uncertainties involved can be normalized and systematically addressed under the same framework. Then, the relevant models can be applied to the CC evaluation procedures, wherein two dispatching schemes (i.e., reliability-driven and coordinated management) are considered to study the effect of DR operation on its CC. The proposed methodology is tested on a modified RTS system, and the obtained results confirm its effectiveness.

[1]  Karl Aberer,et al.  When Bias Matters: An Economic Assessment of Demand Response Baselines for Residential Customers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs , 2010 .

[3]  Mehdi Rahmani-andebili,et al.  Modeling nonlinear incentive-based and price-based demand response programs and implementing on real power markets , 2016 .

[4]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Framework for capacity credit assessment of electrical energy storage and demand response , 2016 .

[5]  Sasa Z. Djokic,et al.  Reliability Planning of Active Distribution Systems Incorporating Regulator Requirements and Network-Reliability Equivalents , 2016 .

[6]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  Challenges and barriers to demand response deployment and evaluation , 2015 .

[7]  Hanchen Xu,et al.  The values of market-based demand response on improving power system reliability under extreme circumstances , 2017 .

[8]  J. Watson,et al.  Multi-Stage Robust Unit Commitment Considering Wind and Demand Response Uncertainties , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Demand response and smart grids—A survey , 2014 .

[10]  Tansu Alpcan,et al.  Game-Theoretic Frameworks for Demand Response in Electricity Markets , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  Arindam Ghosh,et al.  Demand-side response model to avoid spike of electricity price , 2014 .

[12]  Hyung-Geun Kwag,et al.  Reliability modeling of demand response considering uncertainty of customer behavior , 2014 .

[13]  Gengyin Li,et al.  Optimal residential community demand response scheduling in smart grid , 2018 .

[14]  A. Soroudi,et al.  Possibilistic-Scenario Model for DG Impact Assessment on Distribution Networks in an Uncertain Environment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Xiong Li,et al.  Day-ahead stochastic economic dispatch of wind integrated power system considering demand response of residential hybrid energy system , 2017 .

[16]  Lokesh Kumar Panwar,et al.  Demand response aggregator coordinated two-stage responsive load scheduling in distribution system considering customer behaviour , 2017 .

[17]  Zhaohong Bie,et al.  Customer satisfaction based reliability evaluation of active distribution networks , 2016 .

[18]  S. Martin,et al.  Probabilistic congestion management using EVs in a smart grid with intermittent renewable generation , 2016 .

[19]  Wenxian Yang,et al.  A Statistical Demand-Price Model With Its Application in Optimal Real-Time Price , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[20]  Mehdi Rahmani-andebili Nonlinear demand response programs for residential customers with nonlinear behavioral models , 2016 .

[21]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Effects of Load Sector Demand Side Management Applications in Generating Capacity Adequacy Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  T. Aven,et al.  Concerns, Challenges, and Directions of Development for the Issue of Representing Uncertainty in Risk Assessment , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Babak Mozafari,et al.  Reliability assessment of incentive- and priced-based demand response programs in restructured power systems , 2014 .

[24]  Matti Lehtonen,et al.  Distribution network reliability improvements in presence of demand response , 2014 .

[25]  A Keane,et al.  Capacity Value of Wind Power , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  A. Ebrahimi,et al.  Reliability-based nodal evaluation and prioritization of demand response programs , 2015 .

[27]  Xu Yang,et al.  Integrated Planning for Transition to Low-Carbon Distribution System With Renewable Energy Generation and Demand Response , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Jin-ho Kim,et al.  Assessing demand response and smart metering impacts on long-term electricity market prices and system reliability , 2013 .

[29]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Reliability and Risk Assessment of Post-Contingency Demand Response in Smart Distribution Networks , 2016 .

[30]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Generation Expansion Planning With Large Amounts of Wind Power via Decision-Dependent Stochastic Programming , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[31]  S. H. Madaeni,et al.  Using Demand Response to Improve the Emission Benefits of Wind , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[32]  Viktor K. Prasanna,et al.  Optimal Customer Targeting for Sustainable Demand Response in Smart Grids , 2016, ICCS.

[33]  Zhi Chen,et al.  Real-Time Price-Based Demand Response Management for Residential Appliances via Stochastic Optimization and Robust Optimization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[34]  Akbar Ebrahimi,et al.  Short-Term Impacts of DR Programs on Reliability of Wind Integrated Power Systems Considering Demand-Side Uncertainties , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[35]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo simulation for composite power system reliability analysis with time varying loads , 1995 .

[36]  Hakan Delic,et al.  Demand Response Management for Smart Grids With Wind Power , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[37]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Demand Response Management With Multiple Utility Companies: A Two-Level Game Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[38]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Modelling and assessment of the contribution of demand response and electrical energy storage to adequacy of supply , 2015 .