Prevalence and clinical characteristics of adult patients with congenital heart disease in Tuscany

Aims The clinical features of the adult population with congenital heart disease (CHD) are still not well characterized, particularly in the subset with more severe lesions. We report the data collected in the National Association of Hospital Cardiologists Toscana grown-up CHD (GUCH) registry over its first 8-month enrolment period. Methods The Registry included consecutive patients aged more than 16 years with a documented diagnosis of CHD, enrolled in seven different Tuscan hospitals using a web-based electronic form. Severe CHD was defined as cyanotic CHD, or acyanotic lesion with significant haemodynamic impact requiring surgical and/or percutaneous correction. Results Between November 2009 and June 2010 a total of 1641 patients (mean age 41.8 ± 19.3 years, 52.2% women) were enrolled. Atrial septal defect was the most common lesion, accounting for more than one-third of cases. Atrial and ventricular septal defects together accounted for about half of all CHDs. Nearly one-third of patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 or more. A history of recurrent arrhythmias was reported in 15% of cases, and 12% of patients were on oral anticoagulants at the time of enrolment. The prevalence of pulmonary hypertension was 6%, and the prevalence of Eisenmenger syndrome was 1.2%. Severe CHD was present in 42% of patients. Younger age, higher NYHA class, male sex, and the need for oral anticoagulants were the only independent predictors of severe CHD. Conclusion Information about the clinical characteristics and the CHD type distribution of a sample of Tuscan GUCH population was provided. Severe CHD accounts for about 40% of all CHDs in this population. CHD severity is associated with younger age, male gender, worse NYHA class, and need for oral anticoagulation.

[1]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). , 2010, European heart journal.

[2]  F. Meijboom,et al.  Healthcare provision for adults with congenital heart disease in Europe: a review , 2010, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[3]  B. Diggs,et al.  Adults or big kids: what is the ideal clinical environment for management of grown-up patients with congenital heart disease? , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  B. Mulder,et al.  Problems in the organization of care for patients with adult congenital heart disease. , 2010, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

[5]  P. J. Allen,et al.  Transition from pediatric to adult health care for adolescents with congenital heart disease: a review of the literature and clinical implications. , 2009, Pediatric nursing.

[6]  A. Marelli,et al.  Prevalence of severe congenital heart disease after folic acid fortification of grain products: time trend analysis in Quebec, Canada , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  J. Dinardo Grown-up congenital heart (GUCH) disease: an evolving global challenge. , 2008, Annals of cardiac anaesthesia.

[8]  J. Dearani,et al.  Caring for adults with congenital cardiac disease: successes and challenges for 2007 and beyond , 2007, Cardiology in the Young.

[9]  P. Engelfriet,et al.  Pulmonary arterial hypertension in congenital heart disease: an epidemiologic perspective from a Dutch registry. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[10]  A. Marelli,et al.  Congenital Heart Disease in the General Population: Changing Prevalence and Age Distribution , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  M. Ciuffreda,et al.  The grown-up congenital cardiac patient. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[12]  A. Distante,et al.  A multicentre approach for the management of adults with congenital heart disease , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[13]  Philip Moons,et al.  Delivery of care for adult patients with congenital heart disease in Europe: results from the Euro Heart Survey. , 2006, European heart journal.

[14]  P. Engelfriet,et al.  The spectrum of adult congenital heart disease in Europe: morbidity and mortality in a 5 year follow-up period. The Euro Heart Survey on adult congenital heart disease. , 2005, European heart journal.

[15]  C. Warnes,et al.  The adult with congenital heart disease: born to be bad? , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  B J M Mulder,et al.  [National registry and DNA-bank of patients with congenital heart disease: the CONCOR-project]. , 2004, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[17]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Prevalence of congenital heart disease. , 2004, American heart journal.

[18]  L. Iserin,et al.  Grown-up congenital heart (GUCH) disease: current needs and provision of service for adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease in the UK , 2002, Heart.

[19]  H. Dargie Myocardial infarction: redefined or reinvented? , 2002, Heart.

[20]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The incidence of congenital heart disease. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  W. Williams,et al.  Canadian Consensus Conference on Adult Congenital Heart Disease 1996. , 1998, The Canadian journal of cardiology.