A Comparison of On and Offline Networks through the Facebook API

Social Network Sites (SNS) are a part of everyday social activity for millions around the world (boyd and Ellison, 2007). Sites vary in their affordances, audiences and scope. While some sites cater to specific interest group audiences and 'niche' networks, others, such as Facebook, LinkedIn and MySpace are designed to be general purpose 'social utilities'. Are these sites in fact general purpose social utilities? If so, we should expect to find not only an overlap between the pre-existing personal network and the Facebook network, but also a logic that can connect the two. At present, a host of studies are emerging that take Facebook networks as a stand-in for the 'real' social networks of individuals. The study of community structure through Facebook is meant to signify actual community structure (Traud, Kelsic, Mucha, and Porter, 2008). The study of taste on Facebook is meant to signify actual differences and clusters in taste (Lewis, Kaufman, Gonzalez, Wimmer, and Christakis, 2008). These studies, by virtue of their research design, do not actually measure or examine the personal network. Instead, they capture a slice of Facebook's database and assert that for the group in question (generally college students), it is a reliable proxy for the network of active ties. However, if we are to continue down this road, it is important to connect these networks to the pre-existing studies of personal networks and networking. This enables researchers to leverage past insights on personal networks (such as theories of foci, closure, multiplexity and so forth, c.f., Fischer, 1982) and because it is an important validity check on these online networks. This paper is a research outline and a preliminary quantitative autoanalysis of the relationship between the personal network and one's Facebook network. Insofar as Facebook is the most popular social utility for individuals in the United Kingdom and Canada, it is an ideal candidate to examine how personal networks manifest themselves online (or to the extent that they do so).

[1]  S. Feld.  Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates , 1982 .

[2]  B. Wellman.  The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Social and temporal structures in everyday collaboration , 2004, CHI.

[5]  Marco Gonzalez,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Social Networks Tastes, Ties, and Time: a New Social Network Dataset Using Facebook.com , 2022 .

[6]  Yang-chih Fu,et al.  Contact Diaries , 2007 .

[7]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Using egocentric networks to understand communication , 2005, IEEE Internet Computing.

[9]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[10]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms , 2007 .

[11]  C. Fischer.  To Dwell Among Friends , 1982 .

[12]  Christopher McCarty,et al.  A Modified Elicitation of Personal Networks Using Dynamic Visualization , 2005 .

[13]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[14]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[15]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[16]  Markku Lonkila.  Phone notebooks as data on personal networks , 2004 .

[17]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Social Brain Hypothesis , 1998, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[18]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network , 2006, ArXiv.

[19]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[20]  danah boyd,et al.  Faceted Id/Entity : managing representation in a digital world , 2002 .

[21]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Tracy L. M. Kennedy,et al.  Connected Lives: The Project1 , 2006 .

[23]  James M. Murphy,et al.  Friends of Friends , 2004, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[24]  Christopher McCarty,et al.  Structure in Personal Networks , 2002, J. Soc. Struct..

[25]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  R. Alba,et al.  Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. , 1975 .

[27]  C. McCarty,et al.  Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size , 2001 .