Diagnosis of dysarthria subtype via spectral and waveform analysis

This study reports on the performance of a computerised digital signal processing system, known as the Computerised Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment (CFDA), which is designed to diagnose two sub-types of dysarthria – a family of speech disorders characterised by loss of control over the organs which facilitate speech production. This investigation explores the use of both spectral and waveform analysis to distinguish between the ataxic and mixed dysarthria subtypes by assessing articulatory competence in the execution of two speech-related tasks. It is demonstrated that waveform analysis of utterances representing the consonant /p/ can reliably measure a speaker’s lip seal competence; this combination of lip seal evaluation and voice quality measurement can then serve as a composite tool to detect certain pathological features characteristic of ataxic and mixed dysarthria respectively. To validate this hypothesis, this study compares the assessment accuracy of the CFDA application with that of a panel of expert clinicians when evaluating a series of speech samples from a selection of individuals, some of whom were previously diagnosed as suffering from either ataxic or mixed dysarthria. The CFDA’s diagnostic output from this data evaluation exercise produced an overall correlation of 0.91 with those of the expert clinicians. This close correlation reinforces the validity of the objective voice quality evaluation procedures developed during the course of this study.

[1]  P. Enderby,et al.  Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment , 1983 .

[2]  F E Sansone,et al.  Some spectral features of "normal" and simulated "rough" vowels. , 1969, Folia phoniatrica.

[3]  James Carmichael,et al.  Classifying voice quality via pitch and spectral analysis , 2012, CUBE.

[4]  Zhong Lin,et al.  Instant noise estimation using Fourier transform of AMDF and variable start minima search , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[5]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Variability in the perceptual and physiological features of dysarthria following severe closed head injury: an examination of five cases. , 1995, Brain injury.

[6]  James L. Fitch Clinical Applications of Microcomputers in Communication Disorders , 1986 .

[7]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Disorders of nasality in subjects with upper motor neuron type dysarthria following cerebrovascular accident. , 1995, Journal of communication disorders.

[8]  D Michaelis,et al.  Selection and combination of acoustic features for the description of pathologic voices. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Aronson,et al.  Motor Speech Disorders , 2014 .

[10]  Tao Li,et al.  Classification of pathological voice including severely noisy cases , 2004, INTERSPEECH.

[11]  Phil D. Green,et al.  Revisiting dysarthria assessment intelligibility metrics , 2004, INTERSPEECH.

[12]  M. Brin,et al.  Botulinum toxin management of spasmodic dysphonia (laryngeal dystonia): A 12‐year experience in more than 900 patients , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  T. Hsiao Prolonged ulcerative laryngitis: a new disease entity. , 2011, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[14]  P. Enderby,et al.  Relationships between dysarthric groups. , 1986, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[15]  W. Fitch,et al.  Electroglottographic wavegrams: a technique for visualizing vocal fold dynamics noninvasively. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Y Kitazoe,et al.  Harmonic-intensity analysis of normal and hoarse voices. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Adrian Fourcin Voice quality and electrolaryngography , 2000 .

[18]  S. Blaugrund,et al.  High‐Frequency Power Ratio of Breathy Voice , 1992, The Laryngoscope.

[19]  P. Enderby,et al.  Does Speech and Language Therapy Work?: A Review of the Literature , 1995 .

[20]  E S Luschei,et al.  Validation of a modern miniature transducer for measurement of interlabial contact pressure during speech. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  B. Everitt,et al.  Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. , 1993 .

[22]  R. Sataloff Understanding voice problems: A physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment , 1990 .

[23]  P. Boersma ACCURATE SHORT-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY AND THE HARMONICS-TO-NOISE RATIO OF A SAMPLED SOUND , 1993 .

[24]  平野 実,et al.  Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiological Perspective for Diagnosis and Treatment , 1996 .

[25]  Dave Coates Applied Multivariate Data Analysis , 1994 .