Adaptive gravity and joint stiffness compensation methods for force-controlled arm supports

People with muscular weakness can benefit from arm supports that compensate the weight of their arms. Due to the disuse of the arms, passive joint stiffness increases and providing only gravity compensation becomes insufficient to support the arm function. Hence, joint stiffness compensation is also required, for which the use of active arm supports is essential. Force-based control interfaces are a solution for the operation of arm supports. A critical aspect of force-based interfaces, to properly detect the movement intention of the user, is the ability to distinguish the voluntary forces from any other force, such as gravity or joint stiffness forces. Model- and calibration-based strategies for the estimation of gravity and joint stiffness forces lack adaptability and are time consuming since they are measurement dependent. We propose two simple, effective and adaptive methods for the compensation of forces resulting from gravity and joint stiffness. The compensation methods are based on the estimation of the compensation force using a low-pass filter, and switching of control parameters using a finite state machine. The compensation methods were evaluated with an adult man suffering from Duchenne muscular dystrophy with very limited arm function. The results show that when gravity and joint stiffness forces were adaptively compensated the reachable workspace of the user was increased more than 50% compared to the workspace reached when only constant gravity compensation was provided.

[1]  Sunil Agrawal,et al.  Quantifying Anti-Gravity Torques for the Design of a Powered Exoskeleton , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  R. Seliktar,et al.  Design and Testing of a Functional Arm Orthosis in Patients With Neuromuscular Diseases , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Arno H. A. Stienen,et al.  Design and control of an experimental active elbow support for adult Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy patients , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[4]  Use of powered mobile arm supports by people with neuromuscular conditions. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Steven K. Charles,et al.  Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Joan Lobo-Prat,et al.  Non-invasive control interfaces for intention detection in active movement-assistive devices , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  Switching in Systems and Control , 2003, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications.

[8]  Just L. Herder,et al.  A review of assistive devices for arm balancing , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[9]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Controlling impedance at the man/machine interface , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  R Seliktar,et al.  Towards the control of a powered orthosis for people with muscular dystrophy , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[11]  Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al.  2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REHABILITATION ROBOTICS (ICORR) , 2011 .

[12]  Neville Hogan,et al.  An analysis of contact instability in terms of passive physical equivalents , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  F Goubel,et al.  Muscle and joint elastic properties during elbow flexion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Steven K. Charles,et al.  The passive stiffness of the wrist and forearm. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.