Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess (1) the agreement of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) manual and automated polyp linear diameter measurements at CT colonography (CTC), with optical colonoscopic equivalents and (2) intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the CTC measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the same CTC system, two radiologists independently measured the maximum linear diameter of 44 polyps (reference size 3-15 mm) matched on CTC and optical colonoscopy: manual 2D optimized multiplanar reformatted planes with standard window settings (level 1500 HU, width -200 HU), manual 3D measurement with software calipers and automated 3D measurement with software. After 2 weeks, polyps were measured again. Compatibility of CTC measurement with that of optical colonoscopy and measurement reproducibility was assessed statistically. RESULTS In the manual measurement, 44 polyps were analyzed and 41 in automated measurement; three polyps could not be extracted. Although the measurement difference was noted for automated, manual 3D, and manual 2D measurements, statistically supported agreement with optical colonoscopic measurement was noted only with manual 2D measurement for both observers. However, 95% limits of agreement were wide for all the measurement methods. When categorized according to the optical colonoscopic measurement, manual 2D, 3D, and automated measurements showed "good" agreement. Although intraobserver and interobserver agreement was good with manual measurement, intraobserver and interobserver agreement was excellent with automated measurement. CONCLUSION Manual 2D measurements demonstrated trends of better approximation to optical colonoscopy measurements than manual 3D or automated measurements. And automated measurement eliminated intraobserver and interobserver variability. For noninvasive CTC surveillance, manual 2D measurements are expected to measure medium-sized polyps with sufficient agreement with optical colonoscopic measurements and excellent intraobserver and interobserver variability, especially if combined with automated measurement.

[1]  Jamshid Dehmeshki,et al.  Computed Tomography Colonography: Automated Diameter and Volume Measurement of Colonic Polyps Compared With a Manual Technique-In Vitro Study , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  M. Vatn,et al.  Growth and Recurrence of Colorectal Polyps: A Double-Blind 3-Year Intervention with Calcium and Antioxidants , 1998, Digestion.

[3]  M. Fried,et al.  Is histological investigation of polyps always necessary? , 2001, Endoscopy.

[4]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J. Waye,et al.  Small colon polyps. , 1988, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  R. Markert,et al.  Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? , 1996, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

[7]  Bond Jh.  Clinical relevance of the small colorectal polyp. , 2001 .

[8]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. , 2000, Radiology.

[9]  Morson Bc,et al.  The Polyp-cancer Sequence in the Large Bowel , 1974 .

[10]  C. Margulies,et al.  The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[11]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Perry J Pickhardt.  By-patient performance characteristics of CT colonography: importance of polyp size threshold data. , 2003, Radiology.

[13]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays. , 2005, Radiology.

[14]  Y. Masutani,et al.  Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. , 2002, Radiology.

[15]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting , 2006, European Radiology.

[16]  Jorge A Soto,et al.  Automated volumetry at CT colonography: a phantom study. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[17]  B. Veress,et al.  Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study , 2002, Gut.

[18]  M Aickin,et al.  The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection of Polyps in a Colon Phantom: Effect of Scan Orientation, Polyp Size, Collimation, and Dose , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  A. Persson,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography: comparison of two workstations , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[21]  T. Muto,et al.  The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum , 1974, Cancer.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  E G Hahn,et al.  Invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. , 1997, Endoscopy.

[24]  J. Yee,et al.  CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. , 2005, Radiology.

[25]  M. Macari,et al.  Filling defects at CT colonography: pseudo- and diminutive lesions (the good), polyps (the bad), flat lesions, masses, and carcinomas (the ugly). , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[26]  G. Beck,et al.  Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. , 1998, Gastroenterology.

[27]  R. Capocaccia,et al.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence , 2001, Gut.

[28]  A. M. Youssef,et al.  Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. , 2001, Radiology.

[29]  Hiroyuki Yoshida,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[30]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  S. Stryker,et al.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. , 1987, Gastroenterology.

[32]  J. Church.  Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[33]  A. Dachman,et al.  CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? , 2000, Radiology.

[34]  V. Stigliano,et al.  Medium-large polyps of the colon: a contribution for their clinical profile and a proper surveillance. , 1997, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[35]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[36]  Steve Halligan,et al.  CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study. , 2007, Radiology.

[37]  C. Johnson,et al.  Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[38]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .

[39]  H. Yoshida,et al.  Automated detection of polyps with CT colonography: evaluation of volumetric features for reduction of false-positive findings. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[40]  J. Burdick,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. , 2004, JAMA.

[41]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[42]  Morson Bc.  Evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. , 1974 .

[43]  S. Halligan,et al.  CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[44]  J. Bond.  Screening guidelines for colorectal cancer. , 1999, The American journal of medicine.

[45]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  R. Sampliner,et al.  Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? , 1993, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[47]  J. Malley,et al.  Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. , 2002, Radiology.

[48]  T. Winter,et al.  Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography: implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[49]  Jianhua Yao,et al.  Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography. , 2006, Radiology.

[50]  S D Wall,et al.  Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. , 2001, Radiology.

[51]  E. Paulson,et al.  Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison , 2005, The Lancet.