The Interaction Between Voice and Appearance in the Embodiment of a Robot Tutor

Robot embodiment is, by its very nature, holistic and understanding how various aspects contribute to the user perception of the robot is non-trivial. A study is presented here that investigates whether there is an interaction effect between voice and other aspects of embodiment, such as movement and appearance, in a pedagogical setting. An on-line study was distributed to children aged 11–17 that uses a modified Godspeed questionnaire. We show an interaction effect between the robot embodiment and voice in terms of perceived lifelikeness of the robot. Politeness is a key strategy used in learning and teaching, and here an effect is also observed for perceived politeness. Interestingly, participants’ overall preference was for embodiment combinations that are deemed polite and more like a teacher, but are not necessarily the most lifelike. From these findings, we are able to inform the design of robotic tutors going forward.

[1]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  Adaptive Emotional Expression in Robot-Child Interaction , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Steven E. Stern,et al.  Social perception of male and female computer synthesized speech , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Embodiment and Human-Robot Interaction: A Task-Based Perspective , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[4]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  You're Doing It Wrong! Studying Unexpected Behaviors in Child-Robot Interaction , 2015, ICSR.

[5]  Kerstin Fischer,et al.  Levels of embodiment: Linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The Physical Presence of a Robot Tutor Increases Cognitive Learning Gains , 2012, CogSci.

[7]  Donna M. Johnson,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4) , 1988 .

[8]  Jan Kedzierski,et al.  EMYS—Emotive Head of a Social Robot , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[9]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[10]  Helen F. Hastie,et al.  How expressiveness of a robotic tutor is perceived by children in a learning environment , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[11]  Anara Sandygulova,et al.  Children's Responses to Genuine Child Synthesized Speech in Child-Robot Interaction , 2015, HRI.

[12]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Effects of Synthesized Voice Accents on User Perceptions of Robots , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[14]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[15]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  (Ir)relevance of Gender? on the Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Learning with a Robot , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[16]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[17]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[18]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[19]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley , 2011, i-Perception.

[20]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  From embodied to socially embedded agents – Implications for interaction-aware robots , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[21]  IKIP PGRI Semarang.  POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN TEACHER-STUDENT INTERACTION IN AN EFL CLASSROOM CONTEXT , 2013 .

[22]  Kerstin Fischer,et al.  Mindful tutors: Linguistic choice and action demonstration in speech to infants and a simulated robot , 2011 .

[23]  S. King,et al.  The Blizzard Challenge 2013 , 2013, The Blizzard Challenge 2013.

[24]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children: An ethnographic study in real-world settings , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[25]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Communication and knowledge sharing in human-robot interaction and learning from demonstration , 2010, Neural Networks.

[26]  Helen F. Hastie,et al.  Cluster-based Prediction of User Ratings for Stylistic Surface Realisation , 2014, EACL.

[27]  Karolina Zawieska,et al.  Anthropomorphic Robots and Human Meaning Makers in Education , 2016, EDUROBOTICS.

[28]  Sonia Chernova,et al.  The robot management system: a framework for conducting human-robot interaction studies through crowdsourcing , 2014, HRI 2014.