Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings

ABSTRACT: Composting and vermicomposting before addition to the soil is a viable alternative to the disposal of cattle manure. However, this residue has been used in the untreated form for seedling production. This study evaluated the use of cattle manure in natura, and the organic composted or vermicomposted variants of cattle manure on substrates used in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings. The treatments consisted of substrates formulated by mixing the organic fertilizers with washed sand in 20, 40, 60, 80 or 100 (v/v) percentages, compared to a commercial substrate. The E. urograndis seedlings were grown in tubes in a greenhouse and evaluated after 120 days for shoot and root dry weights, plant height, stem diameter, shoot/root ratio, and Dickson quality index. The substrate formulated from a mixture of 80% (v/v) of cattle manure in natura and washed sand allows for better development in Eucalyptus seedlings. Substrate containing 100% bovine manure vermicompost or organic compost produced seedlings with lower quality than in natura bovine manure but superior to the commercial substrate. Due to the health risks associated with use of untreated bovine manure, organic compost and vermicompost are good alternatives for the production of E. urograndis seedlings.

[1]  J. Domínguez,et al.  Changes in the chemical and biological characteristics of grape marc vermicompost during a two-year production period , 2020, Applied Soil Ecology.

[2]  Xiaoqiang Gong,et al.  Spent mushroom substrate and cattle manure amendments enhance the transformation of garden waste into vermicomposts using the earthworm Eisenia fetida. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Alan Henrique Marques de Abreu,et al.  Caracterização de biossólido e potencial de uso na produção de mudas de Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi , 2019, Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental.

[4]  E. Silva,et al.  Produção de mudas de Ceiba speciosa em diferentes volumes de tubetes utilizando o biossólido como substrato , 2019, Ciência Florestal.

[5]  J. Souza,et al.  Desenvolvimento de mudas de eucalipto submetidas à fertirrigação com água residuária da suinocultura , 2018, Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciências Ambientais.

[6]  J. Domínguez,et al.  Cattle Manure Bioconversion Effect on the Availability of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium in Soil , 2018, Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo.

[7]  Maria Helena Fermino,et al.  REUTILIZATION OF RESIDUES AS COMPONENTS OF SUBSTRATE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF Eucalyptus grandis SEEDLINGS , 2018, CERNE.

[8]  Ke Wang,et al.  Changes in structure and function of fungal community in cow manure composting. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[9]  G. L. D. Anjos,et al.  Production of seedlings of yellow passion fruit in different compositions of substrate and environment. , 2018 .

[10]  R. Silva,et al.  Proporções de vermicomposto e vermiculita na produção de mudas de timbaúva e angico-vermelho , 2017 .

[11]  F. A. Villela,et al.  PARÂMETROS FISIOLÓGICOS DE MUDAS DE Albizia niopoides PRODUZIDAS EM DIFERENTES COMPOSIÇÕES DE SUBSTRATO , 2017 .

[12]  O. L. S. Weber,et al.  Mineral fertilization and limestone on the growth of Eucalyptus camaldulensis seedlings , 2017 .

[13]  Z. Antoniolli,et al.  Influence of different concentrations of vermicompost in the development of eucalyptus and pine seedlings. , 2017 .

[14]  A. Liu,et al.  Morphological plasticity and phosphorus uptake mechanisms of hybrid Eucalyptus roots under spatially heterogeneous phosphorus stress , 2017, Journal of Forestry Research.

[15]  F. F. D. S. Binotti,et al.  ESTERCO BOVINO E FIBRA DE COCO NA FORMAÇÃO DE MUDAS DE BARUZEIRO , 2014 .

[16]  F. P. Lamego,et al.  Pigmentos fotossintéticos em azevém suscetível e resistente ao herbicida glyphosate , 2014 .

[17]  J. Hofman,et al.  Effects of combined composting and vermicomposting of waste sludge on arsenic fate and bioavailability. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  Daniel Furtado Ferreira,et al.  Sisvar: a Guide for its Bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons , 2014 .

[19]  A. Nogueira,et al.  Substratos renováveis na produção de mudas de Eucalyptus benthamii , 2013 .

[20]  A. Behling,et al.  Quality assessment of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings using morphological parameters. , 2013 .

[21]  I. A. Bognola,et al.  Influência de calagem e adubação fosfatada no crescimento inicial de eucalipto e nos níveis críticos de P , 2012 .

[22]  Subrata Hait,et al.  Transformation and availability of nutrients and heavy metals during integrated composting-vermicomposting of sewage sludges. , 2012, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[23]  C. E. Silva Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciências Ambientais , 2011 .

[24]  Z. I. Antoniolli,et al.  Utilização de vermicomposto como substrato na produção de mudas de Eucalyptus grandis e Corymbia citriodora , 2011 .

[25]  J. Domínguez,et al.  Influence of vermicompost on plant growth. Contributions toward the development of an objective concept. , 2010 .

[26]  C. Tucci,et al.  Adubação nitrogenada na produção de mudas de mogno (Swietenia macrophylla King) , 2009 .

[27]  Vera Lúcia,et al.  Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Monitoramento e Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento , 2008 .

[28]  José I. Martínez,et al.  Hygienic and ecological risks connected with utilization of animal manures and biosolids in agriculture☆ , 2006, Livestock Science.

[29]  J. L. Waechter,et al.  UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL , 2003 .

[30]  Helio Garcia Leite,et al.  Parâmetros morfológicos na avaliação da qualidade de mudas de eucalyptus grandis , 2001 .

[31]  T. Junior Análise de solo , 1997 .

[32]  A. L. Leaf,et al.  Quality appraisal of White Spruce and White Pine seedling stock in nurseries. , 1960 .