To modulate or not to modulate: Differing results in uniquely shaped Williams syndrome brains

Voxel based morphometry (VBM) studies of Williams syndrome (WS) have demonstrated remarkably consistent findings of reduced posterior parietal gray matter compared to typical controls. Other WS VBM findings have been inconsistent, however. In particular, different findings have been reported for hypothalamus and orbitofrontal gray matter regions. We examined a sample of 8 WS and 9 control adults and show that the hypothalamus and orbitofrontal cortex results depend on whether the images undergo Jacobian modulation. Deformation based morphometry (DBM) analysis demonstrated that major brain shape differences between the groups accounted for the Jacobian modulated gray matter findings. These results indicate that cautious interpretations of modulated gray matter findings are warranted when there are gross shape and size differences between experimental groups. This study demonstrates the importance of methodological choices towards understanding a disorder like WS, but also highlights the consistency of parietal lobe, orbitofrontal, and midbrain findings for this disorder across methodologies, participants, and research groups.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Reduced frontotemporal functional connectivity in schizophrenia associated with auditory hallucinations , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  Allan L. Reiss,et al.  Williams Syndrome: A Neurogenetic Model of Human Behavior , 2006 .

[3]  Mark Noble,et al.  LIM-kinase1 Hemizygosity Implicated in Impaired Visuospatial Constructive Cognition , 1996, Cell.

[4]  U Bellugi,et al.  Evidence for superior parietal impairment in Williams syndrome , 2005, Neurology.

[5]  A. Galaburda,et al.  An Experiment of Nature: Brain Anatomy Parallels Cognition and Behavior in Williams Syndrome , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  C Caltagirone,et al.  Morphology and morphometry of the corpus callosum in Williams syndrome: A T1-weighted MRI study , 2002, Neuroreport.

[7]  Mark A. Eckert,et al.  Anatomical Signatures of Dyslexia in Children: Unique Information from Manual and Voxel Based Morphometry Brain Measures , 2005, Cortex.

[8]  O. Braddick,et al.  A specific deficit of dorsal stream function in Williams' syndrome , 1997, Neuroreport.

[9]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Visual and visuospatial development in young children with Williams syndrome , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Adult Human Brains , 2001, NeuroImage.

[11]  V Menon,et al.  Anomalous brain activation during face and gaze processing in Williams syndrome , 2004, Neurology.

[12]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  I. The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  “Everybody in the world is my friend” hypersociability in young children with Williams syndrome , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[14]  Marko Wilke,et al.  Bright spots: correlations of gray matter volume with IQ in a normal pediatric population , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Object recognition with severe spatial deficits in Williams syndrome: sparing and breakdown , 2006, Cognition.

[16]  Allan L Reiss,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry elucidates structural neuroanatomy of high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome. , 2004, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Identifying global anatomical differences: Deformation‐based morphometry , 1998 .

[18]  Bogdan Draganski,et al.  Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Genetic Contributions to Human Gyrification: Sulcal Morphometry in Williams Syndrome , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search in typically developing toddlers and toddlers with Fragile X or Williams syndrome. , 2004, Developmental science.

[21]  J. Bregman,et al.  Multisystem study of 20 older adults with Williams syndrome , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[22]  U Bellugi,et al.  Analysis of cerebral shape in Williams syndrome. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[23]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  A voxel-based approach to gray matter asymmetries , 2004, NeuroImage.

[24]  Stephan Eliez,et al.  Increased gyrification in Williams syndrome: evidence using 3D MRI methods. , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[25]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Williams syndrome: neuronal size and neuronal-packing density in primary visual cortex. , 2002, Archives of neurology.

[26]  Rumiko Matsuoka,et al.  VI. Genome Structure and Cognitive Map of Williams Syndrome , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Kiralee M. Hayashi,et al.  Abnormal Cortical Complexity and Thickness Profiles Mapped in Williams Syndrome , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Christopher Jarrold,et al.  Divided attention, selective attention and drawing: processing preferences in Williams syndrome are dependent on the task administered , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  C. Mervis,et al.  Neural Basis of Genetically Determined Visuospatial Construction Deficit in Williams Syndrome , 2004, Neuron.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Distributional Assumptions in Voxel-Based Morphometry , 2002, NeuroImage.

[31]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Reduced parietal and visual cortical activation during global processing in Williams syndrome , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[32]  Peter Hammond,et al.  GTF2IRD1 in Craniofacial Development of Humans and Mice , 2005, Science.

[33]  M. A. Frens,et al.  Saccade dysmetria in Williams–Beuren syndrome , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  U Bellugi,et al.  Corpus callosum morphology of Williams syndrome: relation to genetics and behavior. , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.