Performance of individual cells in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack under-load cycling conditions

Abstract The performance of a ten-cell 50 cm 2 100 W polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack was evaluated under dynamic load cycling conditions utilizing the 2005 United States Department of Energy durability test protocol for PEFCs. An enhancement of performance was observed during the first 240 h, while an irreversible degradation of stack performance was observed after 480 h (∼4700 cycles). In particular, the stack voltage at 100 mA cm − 2 was decreased by 2.8% after 480 h and individual cell voltage was decreased up to 8%. An analysis of cell overpotentials for activation, Ohmic, and mass transport losses revealed that the predominant source of performance degradation was due to kinetic losses. The loss of catalyst utilization was estimated to be 39% based on the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) measurements. Electron microscopic images of some of the cells showed growth in cathode Pt particle size from 5.3 to 6.2 nm. However, these microscopic images did not show any membrane damage or electrode thinning. Severe degradation of both the anode and cathode silicone gasket seals was observed during the durability test.

[1]  Hubert A. Gasteiger,et al.  Instability of Pt ∕ C Electrocatalysts in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells A Mechanistic Investigation , 2005 .

[2]  Dai-jun Yang,et al.  Proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation under close to open-circuit conditions: Part I: In situ diagnosis , 2010 .

[3]  Hubert A. Gasteiger,et al.  Determination of Catalyst Unique Parameters for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in a PEMFC , 2006 .

[4]  Paolo Spinelli,et al.  Semi-empirical evaluation of PEMFC electro-catalytic activity , 2008 .

[5]  Martin S. Miller,et al.  A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack testing , 2011 .

[6]  Michael Fowler,et al.  Degradation analysis and modeling of reinforced catalyst coated membranes operated under OCV conditions , 2008 .

[7]  S. Kandlikar,et al.  Thermal management issues in a PEMFC stack – A brief review of current status , 2009 .

[8]  Frano Barbir,et al.  PEM Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[9]  A. Parthasarathy,et al.  Temperature Dependence of the Electrode Kinetics of Oxygen Reduction at the Platinum/Nafion® Interface—A Microelectrode Investigation , 1992 .

[10]  H. Gasteiger,et al.  Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs , 2005 .

[11]  D. Chu,et al.  Performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stacks. Part I. Evaluation and simulation of an air-breathing PEMFC stack , 1999 .

[12]  Mahlon Wilson,et al.  Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[13]  David L. Wood,et al.  PEM fuel cell electrocatalyst durability measurements , 2006 .

[14]  Edward F. Holby,et al.  Instability of Supported Platinum Nanoparticles in Low-Temperature Fuel Cells , 2007 .

[15]  James M. Fenton,et al.  Analysis of Polarization Curves to Evaluate Polarization Sources in Hydrogen/Air PEM Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[16]  P. Pei,et al.  Analysis on the PEM fuel cells after accelerated life experiment , 2010 .

[17]  F. de Bruijn,et al.  Review: Durability and Degradation Issues of PEM Fuel Cell Components , 2008 .

[18]  F. Zuccari,et al.  Efficiency comparison between FC and ice in real urban driving cycles , 2008 .

[19]  Mathias Schulze,et al.  Alteration of the distribution of the platinum catalyst in membrane-electrode assemblies during PEFC operation , 2004 .

[20]  A. Bose,et al.  Optimization of the performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cell membrane-electrode assemblies : Roles of curing parameters on the catalyst and ionomer structures and morphology , 2008 .

[21]  D. Chu,et al.  Comparative studies of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack and single cell , 1999 .