Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges.

OBJECTIVE The current standard-of-care workup of low-risk patients with chest pain in an emergency department takes 12-36 hours and is expensive. We hypothesized that negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography early in the workup of such patients may enable a shorter length of stay and reduce charges. MATERIALS AND METHODS The standard-of-care evaluation consisted of serial cardiac enzyme tests, ECGs, and stress testing. After informed consent, we added cardiac CT early in the standard-of-care workup of 53 consecutive patients. Fifty patients had negative CT findings and were included in this series. The length of stay and charges were analyzed using actual patient data for all patients in the standard-of-care workup and for two earlier discharge scenarios based on negative cardiac CT results: First, CT plus serial enzyme tests and ECGs during an observation period followed by discharge if all were negative; and second, CT plus one set of enzyme tests and one ECG followed by discharge if all were negative. Comparisons were made using paired Student's t tests. RESULTS For standard of care and the two CT-based earlier discharge analyses, the mean lengths of stay were 25.4, 14.3, and 5.0 hours; mean charges were $7,597, $6,153, and $4,251. Length of stay and charges were both significantly less (p < 0.001) for the two CT-based analyses. CONCLUSION In low-risk patients with chest pain, discharge from the emergency department based on negative cardiac CT, enzyme tests, and ECG may significantly decrease both length of stay and hospital charges compared with the standard of care.

[1]  S. Kligerman,et al.  Assessment of Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Evaluation of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) Trial and Its Future Implications , 2011, Current cardiology reports.

[2]  J. Min,et al.  The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[3]  L. Mitsumori,et al.  Negative ECG-gated cardiac CT in patients with low-to-moderate risk chest pain in the emergency department: 1-year follow-up. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  H. Litt,et al.  Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[5]  S. Achenbach,et al.  The year in coronary artery disease. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  F. Lin,et al.  Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 2008, Radiology.

[7]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. , 2008, American heart journal.

[8]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  M. Synnestvedt,et al.  Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[10]  R. Khare,et al.  Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[11]  B. Lewis,et al.  Usefulness of 64-Slice Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosing Acute Coronary Syndromes and Predicting Clinical Outcome in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain of Uncertain Origin , 2007, Circulation.

[12]  Practicality, safety and accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in the evaluation of low TIMI‐risk score chest pain patients: A pilot study , 2007, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[13]  William W O'Neill,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  R. Nowak,et al.  Modified Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score to risk stratify patients in the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome , 2007, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[15]  W. Baxt,et al.  Computed tomography coronary angiography for rapid disposition of low-risk emergency department patients with chest pain syndromes. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[16]  Brian O'Neil,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Patients With Acute Chest Pain , 2006, Circulation.

[18]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  L. McCaig,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. , 2006, Advance data.

[20]  C. Herzog,et al.  64 slice cardiovascular CT in the Emergency Department: concepts and first experiences , 2006, La radiologia medica.

[21]  J. Hollander,et al.  Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[22]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Mark Weiner,et al.  The financial burden of emergency department congestion and hospital crowding for chest pain patients awaiting admission. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[24]  S. Goodacre,et al.  Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[25]  R Ruthazer,et al.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  E. Antman,et al.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.

[27]  L. Goldman,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain. , 1996, Circulation.