Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials: an analysis

OBJECTIVE Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) are smaller than CMAPs after peripheral nerve stimulation, because desynchronization of the TMS-induced motor neurone discharges occurs (i.e. MEP desynchronization). This desynchronization effect can be eliminated by use of the triple stimulation technique (TST; Brain 121 (1998) 437). The objective of this paper is to study the effect of discharge desynchronization on MEPs by comparing the size of MEP and TST responses. METHODS MEP and TST responses were obtained in 10 healthy subjects during isometric contractions of the abductor digiti minimi, during voluntary background contractions between 0% and 20% of maximal force, and using 3 different stimulus intensities. Additional data from other normals and from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were obtained from previous studies. RESULTS MEPs were smaller than TST responses in all subjects and under all stimulating conditions, confirming the marked influence of desynchronization on MEPs. There was a linear relation between the amplitudes of MEPs vs. TST responses, independent of the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity. The slope of the regression equation was 0.66 on average, indicating that desynchronization reduced the MEP amplitude on average by one third, with marked inter-individual variations. A similar average proportion was found in MS patients. CONCLUSIONS The MEP size reduction induced by desynchronization is not influenced by the intensity of TMS and by the level of facilitatory voluntary background contractions. It is similar in healthy subjects and in MS patients, in whom increased desynchronization of central conduction was previously suggested to occur. Thus, the MEP size reduction observed may not parallel the actual amount of desynchronization.

[1]  M. Magistris,et al.  Transcranial stimulation excites virtually all motor neurons supplying the target muscle. A demonstration and a method improving the study of motor evoked potentials. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  C. W. Hess,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: Facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  J Kimura,et al.  Relation between size of compound sensory or muscle action potentials, and length of nerve segment , 1986, Neurology.

[4]  M. Magistris,et al.  Rapid cortical motor output map changes assessed by the triple stimulation technique. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[5]  M. Magistris,et al.  Quantification of upper motor neuron loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  S. Boniface,et al.  Responses of single spinal motoneurons to magnetic brain stimulation in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  M. Magistris,et al.  The triple stimulation technique to study central motor conduction to the lower limbs , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Magistris,et al.  A clinical study of motor evoked potentials using a triple stimulation technique. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  J. Mathis,et al.  Task‐dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions , 1998, Muscle & nerve.