Introducing new joint replacements to clinical practice

Requires collaboration between clinicians and regulators, together with comprehensive surveillance data

[1]  D. Howie,et al.  Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  J. Richardson,et al.  Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  S. Normand,et al.  Comparative assessment of implantable hip devices with different bearing surfaces: systematic appraisal of evidence , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  J. O'Connor,et al.  A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  R. Laskin,et al.  Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  N. Feder.  Medical devices--balancing regulation and innovation. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  I. Clarke,et al.  Metal-on-metal bearing in hip prosthesis generates 100-fold less wear debris than metal-on-polyethylene. , 1999, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.