Mechanochemical Coupling in the Myosin Motor Domain. II. Analysis of Critical Residues

An important challenge in the analysis of mechanochemical coupling in molecular motors is to identify residues that dictate the tight coupling between the chemical site and distant structural rearrangements. In this work, a systematic attempt is made to tackle this issue for the conventional myosin. By judiciously combining a range of computational techniques with different approximations and strength, which include targeted molecular dynamics, normal mode analysis, and statistical coupling analysis, we are able to identify a set of important residues and propose their relevant function during the recovery stroke of myosin. These analyses also allowed us to make connections with previous experimental and computational studies in a critical manner. The behavior of the widely used reporter residue, Trp501, in the simulations confirms the concern that its fluorescence does not simply reflect the relay loop conformation or active-site open/close but depends subtly on its microenvironment. The findings in the targeted molecular dynamics and a previous minimum energy path analysis of the recovery stroke have been compared and analyzed, which emphasized the difference and complementarity of the two approaches. In conjunction with our previous studies, the current set of investigations suggest that the modulation of structural flexibility at both the local (e.g., active-site) and domain scales with strategically placed “hotspot” residues and phosphate chemistry is likely the general feature for mechanochemical coupling in many molecular motors. The fundamental strategies of examining both collective and local changes and combining physically motivated methods and informatics-driven techniques are expected to be valuable to the study of other molecular motors and allosteric systems in general.

[1]  J. Changeux,et al.  Allosteric Mechanisms of Signal Transduction , 2005, Science.

[2]  Jürgen Schlitter,et al.  Targeted Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Conformational Change-Application to the T ↔ R Transition in Insulin , 1993 .

[3]  Q. Cui,et al.  Reconciling the “old” and “new” views of protein allostery: A molecular simulation study of chemotaxis Y protein (CheY) , 2006, Proteins.

[4]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Biomolecular motors: the F1-ATPase paradigm. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Resolution of conformational states of Dictyostelium myosin II motor domain using tryptophan (W501) mutants: implications for the open-closed transition identified by crystallography. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[6]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  The Dynamics of the Relay Loop Tryptophan Residue in theDictyostelium Myosin Motor Domain and the Origin of Spectroscopic Signals* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Ivan Rayment,et al.  X-ray structure of the magnesium(II).ADP.vanadate complex of the Dictyostelium discoideum myosin motor domain to 1.9 A resolution. , 1996 .

[8]  E. Taylor,et al.  Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by actomyosin. , 1971, Biochemistry.

[9]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Building‐block approach for determining low‐frequency normal modes of macromolecules , 2000, Proteins.

[10]  Wenjun Zheng,et al.  Identification of dynamical correlations within the myosin motor domain by the normal mode analysis of an elastic network model. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  G. Oster,et al.  The physics of molecular motors. , 2001, Accounts of chemical research.

[12]  J. Spudich,et al.  The sequence of the myosin 50-20K loop affects Myosin's affinity for actin throughout the actin-myosin ATPase cycle and its maximum ATPase activity. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[13]  D. Manstein,et al.  Mutations in the relay loop region result in dominant‐negative inhibition of myosin II function in Dictyostelium , 2002, EMBO reports.

[14]  W. Im,et al.  Optimized atomic radii for protein continuum electrostatics solvation forces. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[15]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Kinetic resolution of a conformational transition and the ATP hydrolysis step using relaxation methods with a Dictyostelium myosin II mutant containing a single tryptophan residue. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[16]  J. Spudich,et al.  Dictyostelium myosin 25-50K loop substitutions specifically affect ADP release rates. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[17]  Qiang Cui,et al.  Interpreting correlated motions using normal mode analysis. , 2006, Structure.

[18]  R. Vale,et al.  The way things move: looking under the hood of molecular motor proteins. , 2000, Science.

[19]  Zygmunt Gryczynski,et al.  A FRET-Based Sensor Reveals Large ATP Hydrolysis–Induced Conformational Changes and Three Distinct States of the Molecular Motor Myosin , 2000, Cell.

[20]  Kenneth C Holmes,et al.  The molecular mechanism of muscle contraction. , 2005, Advances in protein chemistry.

[21]  K M Trybus,et al.  Loop I can modulate ADP affinity, ATPase activity, and motility of different scallop myosins. Transient kinetic analysis of S1 isoforms. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[22]  M. Karplus,et al.  Proteins: A Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure, and Thermodynamics , 1988 .

[23]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  Kenneth C. Holmes,et al.  Introduction: one contribution of 14 to a discussion meeting issue 'Myosin, muscle and motility' , 2004 .

[25]  John M. Walker,et al.  Molecular Motors , 2007, Methods in Molecular Biology™.

[26]  Tatiana A. Tatusova,et al.  NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  H. Sweeney,et al.  Addition of lysines to the 50/20 kDa junction of myosin strengthens weak binding to actin without affecting the maximum ATPase activity. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[28]  Niels Volkmann,et al.  Myosin isoforms show unique conformations in the actin-bound state , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[30]  M. Karplus,et al.  Normal modes for specific motions of macromolecules: application to the hinge-bending mode of lysozyme. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Structural mechanism of the recovery stroke in the myosin molecular motor. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  O Jardetzky,et al.  Protein dynamics and conformational transitions in allosteric proteins. , 1996, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[33]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[34]  Guohui Li,et al.  A coarse-grained normal mode approach for macromolecules: an efficient implementation and application to Ca(2+)-ATPase. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2002 .

[36]  K C Holmes,et al.  Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[37]  P. Krüger,et al.  Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions. , 1994, Journal of molecular graphics.

[38]  C A Smith,et al.  X-ray structure of the magnesium(II).ADP.vanadate complex of the Dictyostelium discoideum myosin motor domain to 1.9 A resolution. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[39]  Robert L Jernigan,et al.  Myosin flexibility: Structural domains and collective vibrations , 2004, Proteins.

[40]  Lila M Gierasch,et al.  The changing landscape of protein allostery. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[41]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  R. Ranganathan,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. , 1999, Science.

[43]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  A normal mode analysis of structural plasticity in the biomolecular motor F(1)-ATPase. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[45]  M. Karplus,et al.  Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems , 1996 .

[46]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[47]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Low-frequency normal modes that describe allosteric transitions in biological nanomachines are robust to sequence variations , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Qiang Cui,et al.  Mechanochemical coupling in myosin: A theoretical analysis with molecular dynamics and combined QM/MM reaction path calculations , 2004 .

[49]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[50]  H. Sweeney,et al.  Two Conserved Lysines at the 50/20-kDa Junction of Myosin Are Necessary for Triggering Actin Activation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  Kazuo Sutoh,et al.  Requirement of Domain-Domain Interaction for Conformational Change and Functional ATP Hydrolysis in Myosin* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  S. Burgess,et al.  Flexibility within Myosin Heads Revealed by Negative Stain and Single-Particle Analysis , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[53]  H M Holden,et al.  X-ray Structures of the Apo and MgATP-bound States ofDictyostelium discoideum Myosin Motor Domain* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  D. Beglov,et al.  Atomic Radii for Continuum Electrostatics Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Simulations , 1997 .

[55]  D. Bar-Sagi,et al.  The structural basis for the transition from Ras-GTP to Ras-GDP , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  J. Spudich,et al.  The Myosin Relay Helix to Converter Interface Remains Intact throughout the Actomyosin ATPase Cycle* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  I. Bahar,et al.  Normal mode analysis : theory and applications to biological and chemical systems , 2005 .

[58]  Kazuo Sutoh,et al.  Dictyostelium myosin II mutations that uncouple the converter swing and ATP hydrolysis cycle. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[59]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[60]  Niels Volkmann,et al.  Evidence for cleft closure in actomyosin upon ADP release , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[61]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[62]  A. Becker,et al.  A structural model for actin-induced nucleotide release in myosin , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[63]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[64]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Kinetic Analysis of ATPase Mechanisms , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[65]  Anne Houdusse,et al.  Three myosin V structures delineate essential features of chemo‐mechanical transduction , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[66]  Haibo Yu,et al.  Mechanochemical Coupling in the Myosin Motor Domain. I. Insights from Equilibrium Active-Site Simulations , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[67]  Qiang Cui,et al.  Analysis of functional motions in Brownian molecular machines with an efficient block normal mode approach: myosin-II and Ca2+ -ATPase. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[68]  Carl A. Morris,et al.  A structural state of the myosin V motor without bound nucleotide , 2003, Nature.

[69]  Frederick W. Dahlquist,et al.  Switched or Not?: the Structure of Unphosphorylated CheY Bound to the N Terminus of FliM , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[70]  James A. Spudich,et al.  A myosin II mutation uncouples ATPase activity from motility and shortens step size , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[71]  Ann M Stock,et al.  A New Perspective on Response Regulator Activation , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[72]  J. Spudich,et al.  Structure-function studies of the myosin motor domain: importance of the 50-kDa cleft. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[73]  D. Case Normal mode analysis of protein dynamics , 1994 .

[74]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: New results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme , 1998, Proteins.

[75]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .

[76]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site : A matter of pre-existing populations , 2001 .

[77]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[78]  Rasmus R. Schröder,et al.  Electron cryo-microscopy shows how strong binding of myosin to actin releases nucleotide , 2003, Nature.

[79]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Model‐free methods of analyzing domain motions in proteins from simulation: A comparison of normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme , 1997, Proteins.

[80]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[81]  R. Yasuda,et al.  Modulation of actin filament sliding by mutations of the SH2 cysteine in Dictyostelium myosin II. , 1997, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[82]  S. Rosenfeld,et al.  Kinetic Tuning of Myosin via a Flexible Loop Adjacent to the Nucleotide Binding Pocket* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[83]  T Shimada,et al.  Mutational Analysis of the Switch II Loop ofDictyostelium Myosin II* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[84]  Ivan Rayment,et al.  The Structural Basis of the Myosin ATPase Activity* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[85]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  The effect of F-actin on the relay helix position of myosin II, as revealed by tryptophan fluorescence, and its implications for mechanochemical coupling. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[86]  Michael D. Daily,et al.  Local motions in a benchmark of allosteric proteins , 2007, Proteins.

[87]  D E Wemmer,et al.  Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. , 2001, Science.

[88]  D. Kern,et al.  The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.