Development and pilot evaluation of a preoperative briefing protocol for cardiovascular surgery.

BACKGROUND Preprocedural briefings have been adopted in many high consequence environments, but have not been widely accepted in medicine. We sought to develop, implement, and evaluate a preoperative briefing for cardiovascular surgery. STUDY DESIGN The briefing was developed by using a combined questionnaire and semistructured focus group approach involving five subspecialties of surgical staff (n=55). The results were used to design and implement a preoperative briefing protocol. The briefing was evaluated by monitoring surgical flow disruptions, circulating nurse trips to the core, time spent in the core, and cost-waste reports before and after implementation of the briefing across 16 cardiac surgery cases. RESULTS Focus group data indicated consensus among surgical staff concerning briefing benefits, duration, location, content, and potential barriers. Disagreement arose concerning timing of the brief and the roles of key participants. After implementation of the briefing, there was a reduction in total surgical flow disruptions per case (5.4 preimplementation versus 2.8 postimplementation, p=0.004) and reductions in per case average of procedural knowledge disruptions (4.1 versus 2.17, p=0.004) and miscommunication events (2.5 versus 1.17, p=0.03). There was no significant reduction in disruptions because of equipment preparation or disruptions from patient-related issues. On average, briefed teams experienced fewer trips to the core (10 versus 4.7, p=0.004) and spent less time in the core (397.4 seconds versus 172.3 seconds, p=0.006), and there was a trend toward decreased waste (30% versus 17%, p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate the feasibility of creating a specialty-specific preoperative briefing to decrease surgical flow disruptions and improve patient safety in the operating room.

[1]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[2]  R. Reznick,et al.  Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[3]  D. Torchiana,et al.  Impact of cardiac intraoperative precursor events on adverse outcomes. , 2007, Surgery.

[4]  D. Malenka,et al.  Intra- and postoperative predictors of stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  M R de Leval,et al.  The human factor in cardiac surgery: errors and near misses in a high technology medical domain. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Operating room briefings and wrong-site surgery. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals. , 2003, Journal of critical care.

[8]  G R Baker,et al.  Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[9]  L. Lingard,et al.  Towards safer interprofessional communication: Constructing a model of “utility” from preoperative team briefings , 2006, Journal of interprofessional care.

[10]  Douglas A Wiegmann,et al.  Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. , 2007, Surgery.

[11]  T. Lancet.  WHO's patient-safety checklist for surgery , 2008, The Lancet.

[12]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Berg, Bruce L. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2007 , 2008, Inf. Res..

[13]  David M Studdert,et al.  Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. , 2003, Surgery.

[14]  Douglas A Wiegmann,et al.  Application of the human factors analysis and classification system methodology to the cardiovascular surgery operating room. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  John N. Lewis,et al.  Expanded surgical time out: a key to real-time data collection and quality improvement. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  Joseph P Desimone,et al.  Perioperative stroke and long-term survival after coronary bypass graft surgery. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Team Communications in the Operating Room: Talk Patterns, Sites of Tension, and Implications for Novices , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[19]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[20]  René Amalberti,et al.  The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems , 2001 .

[21]  K. Catchpole,et al.  Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. , 2007, Surgery.

[22]  J. Defontes,et al.  Preoperative Safety Briefing Project. , 2004, The Permanente journal.

[23]  John C. Morey,et al.  Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. , 2002, Health services research.

[24]  R. Reznick,et al.  Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. , 2008, Archives of surgery.

[25]  A. McEwan,et al.  Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using Formula 1 pit‐stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality , 2007, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[26]  Douglas A. Wiegmann,et al.  Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[27]  S. Fagan,et al.  Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training. , 2005, American journal of surgery.