Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Small animal fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) can be a powerful tool for preclinical drug discovery and development studies1. However, light absorption by tissue chromophores (e.g., hemoglobin, water, lipids, melanin) typically limits optical signal propagation through thicknesses larger than a few millimeters2. Compared to other visible wavelengths, tissue absorption for red and near-infrared (near-IR) light absorption dramatically decreases and non-elastic scattering becomes the dominant light-tissue interaction mechanism. The relatively recent development of fluorescent agents that absorb and emit light in the near-IR range (600-1000 nm), has driven the development of imaging systems and light propagation models that can achieve whole body three-dimensional imaging in small animals3. Despite great strides in this area, the ill-posed nature of diffuse fluorescence tomography remains a significant problem for the stability, contrast recovery and spatial resolution of image reconstruction techniques and the optimal approach to FMI in small animals has yet to be agreed on. The majority of research groups have invested in charge-coupled device (CCD)-based systems that provide abundant tissue-sampling but suboptimal sensitivity4-9, while our group and a few others10-13 have pursued systems based on very high sensitivity detectors, that at this time allow dense tissue sampling to be achieved only at the cost of low imaging throughput. Here we demonstrate the methodology for applying single-photon detection technology in a fluorescence tomography system to localize a cancerous brain lesion in a mouse model. The fluorescence tomography (FT) system employed single photon counting using photomultiplier tubes (PMT) and information-rich time-domain light detection in a non-contact conformation11. This provides a simultaneous collection of transmitted excitation and emission light, and includes automatic fluorescence excitation exposure control14, laser referencing, and co-registration with a small animal computed tomography (microCT) system15. A nude mouse model was used for imaging. The animal was inoculated orthotopically with a human glioma cell line (U251) in the left cerebral hemisphere and imaged 2 weeks later. The tumor was made to fluoresce by injecting a fluorescent tracer, IRDye 800CW-EGF (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) targeted to epidermal growth factor receptor, a cell membrane protein known to be overexpressed in the U251 tumor line and many other cancers18. A second, untargeted fluorescent tracer, Alexa Fluor 647 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) was also injected to account for non-receptor mediated effects on the uptake of the targeted tracers to provide a means of quantifying tracer binding and receptor availability/density27. A CT-guided, time-domain algorithm was used to reconstruct the location of both fluorescent tracers (i.e., the location of the tumor) in the mouse brain and their ability to localize the tumor was verified by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Though demonstrated for fluorescence imaging in a glioma mouse model, the methodology presented in this video can be extended to different tumor models in various small animal models potentially up to the size of a rat17.

[1]  B. Pogue,et al.  Automatic exposure control and estimation of effective system noise in diffuse fluorescence tomography. , 2009, Optics express.

[2]  Minutes,et al.  MOLECULAR IMAGING IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT , 2003 .

[3]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology , 2008, Nature.

[4]  S. Arridge Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .

[5]  Y. Bérubé-Lauzière,et al.  Diffuse light propagation in biological media by a time-domain parabolic simplified spherical harmonics approximation with ray-divergence effects. , 2010, Applied optics.

[6]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Near infrared optical tomography using NIRFAST: Algorithm for numerical model and image reconstruction. , 2009, Communications in numerical methods in engineering.

[7]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Accuracy of fluorescent tomography in the presence of heterogeneities:study of the normalized born ratio , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  H Dehghani,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element model and image reconstruction algorithm for time-domain fluorescence imaging in highly scattering media , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Toward whole-body optical imaging of rats using single-photon counting fluorescence tomography. , 2011, Optics letters.

[10]  O Nalcioglu,et al.  A photo-multiplier tube-based hybrid MRI and frequency domain fluorescence tomography system for small animal imaging , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Stephen B. Tuttle,et al.  Magnetic resonance-coupled fluorescence tomography scanner for molecular imaging of tissue. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[12]  Scott C Davis,et al.  Pre-clinical whole-body fluorescence imaging: Review of instruments, methods and applications. , 2010, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[13]  G. Allan Johnson,et al.  High-resolution reconstruction of fluorescent inclusions in mouse thorax using anatomically guided sampling and parallel Monte Carlo computing , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[14]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Early photon tomography allows fluorescence detection of lung carcinomas and disease progression in mice in vivo , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Xin Liu,et al.  A Combined Fluorescence and Microcomputed Tomography System for Small Animal Imaging , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Free-space fluorescence molecular tomography utilizing 360° geometry projections , 2007 .

[17]  J C Kennedy,et al.  Endogenous protoporphyrin IX, a clinically useful photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. , 1992, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[18]  Yuting Lin,et al.  Quantitative fluorescence tomography using a combined tri-modality FT/DOT/XCT system , 2010, Optics express.

[19]  Jason R. Gunn,et al.  In Vivo Quantification of Tumor Receptor Binding Potential with Dual-Reporter Molecular Imaging , 2012, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[20]  Jean-Marc Dinten,et al.  Optical calibration protocol for an x-ray and optical multimodality tomography system dedicated to small-animal examination. , 2009, Applied optics.

[21]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Free-space fluorescence molecular tomography utilizing 360 degrees geometry projections. , 2007, Optics letters.

[22]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  A microcomputed tomography guided fluorescence tomography system for small animal molecular imaging. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[23]  Ian Lewis,et al.  Proceedings of the SPIE , 2012 .

[24]  S. Gibbs-Strauss Noninvasive fluorescence monitoring for functional assessment of murine glioma treatment , 2008 .

[25]  V. Johnson,et al.  A Bayesian Chi‐Squared Goodness‐of‐Fit Test for Censored Data Models , 2010, Biometrics.

[26]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Experimental three-dimensional fluorescence reconstruction of diffuse media by use of a normalized Born approximation. , 2001, Optics letters.

[27]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Singular value decomposition metrics show limitations of detector design in diffuse fluorescence tomography , 2010, Biomedical optics express.

[28]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Imaging workflow and calibration for CT-guided time-domain fluorescence tomography , 2011, Biomedical optics express.