Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions

Agricultural activities are a substantial contributor to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, accounting for about 58% of the world's anthropogenic non-carbon dioxide GHG emissions and 14% of all anthropogenic GHG emissions, and agriculture is often viewed as a potential source of relatively low-cost emissions reductions. We estimate the costs of GHG mitigation for 36 world agricultural regions for the 2000-2020 period, taking into account net GHG reductions, yield effects, livestock productivity effects, commodity prices, labor requirements, and capital costs where appropriate. For croplands and rice cultivation, we use biophysical, process-based models (DAYCENT and DNDC) to capture the net GHG and yield effects of baseline and mitigation scenarios for different world regions. For the livestock sector, we use information from the literature on key mitigation options and apply the mitigation options to emission baselines compiled by EPA. Copyright 2008 International Association of Agricultural Economists.

[1]  I. Bakam,et al.  Emission trading in agriculture: a study of design options using an agent-based approach , 2009 .

[2]  William Salas,et al.  Assessing alternatives for mitigating net greenhouse gas emissions and increasing yields from rice production in China over the next twenty years. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[3]  Elizabeth A. Scheehle and Dina Kruger Global Anthropogenic Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions , 2006 .

[4]  R. Beach,et al.  Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation in Agriculture , 2006 .

[5]  W. Parton,et al.  Simulated Interaction of Carbon Dynamics and Nitrogen Trace Gas Fluxes Using the DAYCENT Model1 , 2006 .

[6]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing , 2006 .

[7]  Reiner Wassmann,et al.  Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from rice‐based production systems: Sensitivity and upscaling , 2004 .

[8]  Reiner Wassmann,et al.  Characterization of Methane Emissions from Rice Fields in Asia. III. Mitigation Options and Future Research Needs , 2000, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[9]  C. Barrett,et al.  Better Technology, Better Plots, or Better Farmers? Identifying Changes in Productivity and Risk Among Malagasy Rice Farmers , 2004 .

[10]  J. W. Doran,et al.  Managing soil denitrification , 2002 .

[11]  B. McCarl,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture and Forestry , 2001, Science.

[12]  R. Wassmann,et al.  Sulfate-containing amendments to reduce methane emissions from rice fields: mechanisms, effectiveness and costs , 2001 .

[13]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 2001 .

[14]  C. Kroeze,et al.  New Estimates for Emissions of Nitrous Oxide , 2000 .

[15]  P. Riemer,et al.  Technologies for reducing methane emissions , 1999 .

[16]  W. Parton,et al.  DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing , 1998 .

[17]  Caroline King,et al.  Agriculture and Forestry , 1992 .