Virtual Bladder Tumor Transurethral Resection: An Objective Evaluation Tool to Overcome Learning Curves with and without Photodynamic Diagnostics

Introduction: Virtual reality (VR) simulation has been known to shorten learning curves. The aim of this research was to determine whether VR transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) with and without photodynamic diagnostic (PDD) can improve endourological skills in novice and trained endoscopists. Materials and Methods: Residents without experience (n = 15) completed five 5-min white light VR-TURBT scenarios. The trained endoscopists (≧25 TURBTs; n = 15) performed five 5-min VR resections using white light and PDD cystoscopy. The VR-TURBT performance with the Uro-Trainer® (Karl Storz GmbH, Germany) was compared between the first and last 5 cases using computer-generated parameters [inspected area (%), resected tumor mass (%) and bleeding (ml)]. The trained endoscopists’ parameters were compared with white light versus PDD-VR-TURBT. Results: Among novices, the inspected area increased from 36.8 (±12.9) to 54.3% (±7.3), p < 0.05. Significant improvements were noted for resection rates from 26.5 (±9.6) to 52.0% (±6.0), p < 0.05. Trained urologists showed superior inspection [52.2 (±3.4) vs. 62.7% (±4.3), p = 0.003] and resection rates [43.8 (±3.3) vs. 57.1% (±5.3), p = 0.002] with PDD. Conclusions: The opportunity to evaluate objective patient-independent measurements establishes the Uro-Trainer as a beneficial tool in enhancing TURBT quality. Results demonstrated that novices improved their ability to perform complete resection, and the TURBT rates of trained urologists were superior in PDD compared with a white light setting.

[1]  R. Aggarwal,et al.  Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  Robert M Sweet,et al.  Surgical simulation: a urological perspective. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[3]  S. Kruck,et al.  Hexyl aminolevulinate fluorescence cystoscopy in bladder cancer , 2009, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[4]  Barbara M A Schout,et al.  Update on training models in endourology: a qualitative systematic review of the literature between January 1980 and April 2008. , 2008, European urology.

[5]  Timothy M. Kowalewski,et al.  Face, content and construct validity of the University of Washington virtual reality transurethral prostate resection trainer. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Kenneth Ogan,et al.  Use of a virtual reality simulator for ureteroscopy training. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[7]  C. Abbou,et al.  Simulation training in video-assisted urologic surgery , 2006, Current urology reports.

[8]  D. Schilling,et al.  Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs? , 2009, World Journal of Urology.

[9]  A. J. M. Hendrikx,et al.  Perceptions of surgical specialists in general surgery, orthopaedic surgery, urology and gynaecology on teaching endoscopic surgery in The Netherlands , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  Raphaela Waidelich,et al.  High-level virtual reality simulator for endourologic procedures of lower urinary tract. , 2006, Urology.

[11]  H. Grossman,et al.  Hexaminolevulinate guided fluorescence cystoscopy reduces recurrence in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[12]  A Darzi,et al.  Simulation in urology – a role for virtual reality? , 2001, BJU international.

[13]  Syed Haque,et al.  A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[14]  A. Scherpbier,et al.  How useful and realistic is the uro trainer for training transurethral prostate and bladder tumor resection procedures? , 2009, The Journal of urology.