A quantitative index of land-use intensity in grasslands: Integrating mowing, grazing and fertilization

Abstract Land use is increasingly recognized as a major driver of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in many current research projects. In grasslands, land use is often classified by categorical descriptors such as pastures versus meadows or fertilized versus unfertilized sites. However, to account for the quantitative variation of multiple land-use types in heterogeneous landscapes, a quantitative, continuous index of land-use intensity (LUI) is desirable. Here we define such a compound, additive LUI index for managed grasslands including meadows and pastures. The LUI index summarizes the standardized intensity of three components of land use, namely fertilization, mowing, and livestock grazing at each site. We examined the performance of the LUI index to predict selected response variables on up to 150 grassland sites in the Biodiversity Exploratories in three regions in Germany (Alb, Hainich, Schorfheide). We tested the average Ellenberg nitrogen indicator values of the plant community, nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in the aboveground plant biomass, plant-available phosphorus concentration in the top soil, and soil C/N ratio, and the first principle component of these five response variables. The LUI index significantly predicted the principal component of all five response variables, as well as some of the individual responses. Moreover, vascular plant diversity decreased significantly with LUI in two regions (Alb and Hainich). Inter-annual changes in management practice were pronounced from 2006 to 2008, particularly due to variation in grazing intensity. This rendered the selection of the appropriate reference year(s) an important decision for analyses of land-use effects, whereas details in the standardization of the index were of minor importance. We also tested several alternative calculations of a LUI index, but all are strongly linearly correlated to the proposed index. The proposed LUI index reduces the complexity of agricultural practices to a single dimension and may serve as a baseline to test how different groups of organisms and processes respond to land use. In combination with more detailed analyses, this index may help to unravel whether and how land-use intensities, associated disturbance levels or other local or regional influences drive ecological processes.

[1]  Johannes Isselstein,et al.  Plant species richness and composition in managed grasslands: The relative importance of field management and environmental factors , 2007 .

[2]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species , 2006 .

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  L. Sheppard,et al.  Linking N-driven biodiversity changes with soil N availability in a Mediterranean ecosystem , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[5]  J. Ghazoul,et al.  Hay harvesting causes high orthopteran mortality , 2010 .

[6]  H. Ellenberg Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen : in ökologischer ,dynamischer und historischer Sicht , 2010 .

[7]  M. Vidrih,et al.  Influence of cutting regime and fertilizer application on the botanical composition, yield and nutritive value of herbage of wet grasslands in Central Europe , 2009 .

[8]  J. Stewart,et al.  Changes in Inorganic and Organic Soil Phosphorus Fractions Induced by Cultivation Practices and by Laboratory Incubations1 , 1982 .

[9]  D. Scott Sustainability of New Zealand high‐country pastures under contrasting development inputs. 7. Environmental gradients, plant species selection, and diversity , 2001 .

[10]  J. P. Riley,et al.  A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters , 1962 .

[11]  M. Diekmann Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – a review , 2003 .

[12]  F. Nevens,et al.  Effects of cutting or grazing grass swards on herbage yield, nitrogen uptake and residual soil nitrate at different levels of N fertilization , 2003 .

[13]  T. Vellinga,et al.  Sixty years of Dutch nitrogen fertiliser experiments, an overview of the effects of soil type, fertiliser input, management and of developments in time , 1999 .

[14]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Assessing the intensity of temperate European agriculture at the landscape scale , 2006 .

[15]  P. Leinweber,et al.  How does the Hedley sequential phosphorus fractionation reflect impacts of land use and management on soil phosphorus: A review , 2009 .

[16]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[17]  Sebastiaan Luyssaert,et al.  Quantifying land use and disturbance intensity in forestry, based on the self‐thinning relationship , 2011 .

[18]  D. Bailey,et al.  How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes , 2007 .

[19]  V. Brown,et al.  Influence of agricultural management, sward structure and food resources on grassland field use, by birds in lowland England , 2005 .

[20]  Jens Nieschulze,et al.  Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: The Biodiversity Exploratories , 2010 .

[21]  Jessie A. Wells,et al.  Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[22]  B. Green Agricultural intensification and the loss of habitat, species and amenity in British grasslands: a review of historical change and assessment of future prospects† , 1990 .

[23]  Billie Turner,et al.  The concept and measure of agricultural intensity , 1978 .

[24]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan‐European study , 2007 .

[25]  A. J. Shriar,et al.  Agricultural intensity and its measurement in frontier regions , 2000, Agroforestry Systems.

[26]  M. Schrumpf,et al.  Phosphorus partitioning in grassland and forest soils of Germany as related to land-use type, management intensity, and land use–related pH , 2011 .

[27]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Nutrient concentrations and fibre contents of plant community biomass reflect species richness patterns along a broad range of land-use intensities among agricultural grasslands , 2011 .

[28]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[29]  N. Hölzel,et al.  Effects of grazing on seasonal variation of aboveground biomass quality in calcareous grasslands , 2011, Plant Ecology.

[30]  I. Ribera,et al.  The Impact of Different Agricultural Land-uses on Epigeal Spider Diversity in Scotland , 1999, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[31]  F. Schasfoort,et al.  Available online at www.sciencedirect.com , 2004 .

[32]  V. Wolters,et al.  Contrasting diversity patterns of epigeic arthropods between grasslands of high and low agronomic potential , 2010 .

[33]  J. Roelofs,et al.  The restoration of fens in the Netherlands , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[34]  J. Bakker,et al.  Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Christopher B Field,et al.  The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Carsten Thies,et al.  REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[37]  A. Machado,et al.  An index of naturalness , 2004 .

[38]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY INDEX , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.