Evaluation of a new orthodontic bonding system (Beauty Ortho Bond)

Background: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new orthodontic bonding system (Beauty Ortho Bond) involving the shear bond strength in dry and wet environments, and adhesion remnant index (ARI) scores evaluation in regard to other bonding systems (Heliosit and Resilience Orthodontic Adhesives). Materials and methods: Sixty defect free extracted premolars were randomly divided into six groups of 10 teeth each, mounted in acrylic resin, three groups for a dry environment and three for a wet one. Shear bond strength test was performed with a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min, while surfaces of enamel and bracket-adhesive-enamel surfaces were examined with stereomicroscope For ARI scores evaluation. Data were analyzed by one way analysis of variance, least significant difference, student's t-test, and Fisher exact test. Results: The mean shear bond strength showed highest values for Resilience adhesive followed by Beauty Ortho Bond and Heliosit adhesives respectively both in dry and wet environments. Interestingly, there was a non-significant difference (P<0.05) between Resilience and Beauty Ortho Bond adhesives using least significant difference at dry environment. In wet environment the Beauty Ortho Bond showed an acceptable mean shear bond strength value (6.39 Mpa) which is considered as a clinically acceptable value. Adhesive remnant index scores demonstrated a tendency towards score 1 in dry environment, and towards score 3 in wet environment, the scores also showed a non-significant difference (P<0.05) between Resilience and Beauty Ortho Bond adhesives using Fischer exact test. Conclusion: Beauty Ortho Bond is less sensitive to wet environment than Resilience and Heliosit adhesives, therefore it has an advantage during clean up, as it reduces the risk of enamel damage during debonding procedure.

[1]  Gabriel Sáez Espínola,et al.  Comparison between the adhesion forces of two orthodontic systems with moisture affinity in two enamel surface conditions , 2014 .

[2]  A. Loguércio,et al.  Effect of different times of solvent evaporation and pH in two self-etching adhesive systems on the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets , 2014 .

[3]  T. Ozer,et al.  Comparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching. , 2009, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Bond strength comparison and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of three orthodontic bonding systems. , 2008, Dental materials journal.

[5]  L. A. Bravo,et al.  Effects of 3 adhesion promoters on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  B. Kahl-Nieke,et al.  Effect of debonding force direction on orthodontic shear bond strength. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  F. Mante,et al.  Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  K. Titley,et al.  The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  F. Tay,et al.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  T. Eliades,et al.  Comparison of enamel colour changes associated with orthodontic bonding using two different adhesives. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.

[11]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  The effect of phosphoric acid concentration on resin tag length and bond strength of a photo-cured resin to acid-etched enamel. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  W. N. Wang,et al.  Fluoridated etching on orthodontic bonding. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  W. N. Wang,et al.  Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  C. Johnston,et al.  The effect of etch duration on the microstructure of molar enamel: an in vitro study. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  H. Nakajima,et al.  Bond strengths and fracture modes of three orthodontic adhesives. , 1993, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[16]  D. Beech,et al.  Bonding of Polymers to Enamel: Influence of Deposits Formed During Etching, Etching Time and Period of Water Immersion , 1980, Journal of dental research.

[17]  I. Reynolds A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding , 1975 .

[18]  F. Miura,et al.  New direct bonding system for plastic brackets. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[19]  G. V. Newman Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. , 1965, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  L. T. Swanson,et al.  Factors affecting bonding to human enamel with special reference to a plastic adhesive. , 1960, The Journal of the American Dental Association (1939).

[21]  M. Buonocore A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.

[22]  Yassir A. Yassir,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of chemical and light-cured bonding materials with stainless steel, ceramic, and sapphire brackets , 2011 .

[23]  Wei Nan Wang,et al.  Bond strength of various bracket base designs. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  T. Eliades,et al.  5 Enamel Etching and Bond Strength , 2001 .

[25]  W. Carstensen Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. , 1986, American journal of orthodontics.