Evaluation by Grade 5 and 6 Students of the Promisingness of Ideas in Knowledge-Building Discourse

Knowledge creation requires identifying and pursuing promising ideas—ideas that in their nascent form may not seem like much but that with development could grow into something big. The goal of our research is to develop a tool to explore the concept of promisingness and “big ideas,” especially elementary school students’ ability to make “promisingness judgments” regarding ideas in peer discourse. Toward this end we developed a “Big Ideas” tool to facilitate students’ selection of the ideas they thought were promising in their online discourse. A study conducted in two Grade 5/6 classes examined the nature of “big ideas” selected from the online discourse of younger Grade 4 students. A preliminary analysis indicated that students tended to identify as promising important facts and questions in the Grade 4 discourse. This study will inform future work in designing tools, language, and techniques to facilitate the concept of promisingness.

[1]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[2]  J. Biggs Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes , 1979 .

[3]  MISSING-VALUE MISSING-VALUE,et al.  Knowledge Building , 2017 .

[4]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[5]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Designs for Collective Cognitive Responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities , 2009 .

[6]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[7]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .

[8]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise , 1993 .

[9]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[10]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4 , 2010 .

[11]  P. Benson,et al.  Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An enquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publications. , 2006 .

[12]  Nwy Law,et al.  Characterizing patterns of interaction in knowledge building discourse , 2008 .

[13]  M. Scardamalia Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[14]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning , 2004 .