Multi‐scale modeling of GMP differentiation based on single‐cell genealogies

Hematopoiesis is often pictured as a hierarchy of branching decisions, giving rise to all mature blood cell types from stepwise differentiation of a single cell, the hematopoietic stem cell. Various aspects of this process have been modeled using various experimental and theoretical techniques on different scales. Here we integrate the more common population‐based approach with a single‐cell resolved molecular differentiation model to study the possibility of inferring mechanistic knowledge of the differentiation process. We focus on a sub‐module of hematopoiesis: differentiation of granulocyte–monocyte progenitors (GMPs) to granulocytes or monocytes. Within a branching process model, we infer the differentiation probability of GMPs from the experimentally quantified heterogeneity of colony assays under permissive conditions where both granulocytes and monocytes can emerge. We compare the predictions with the differentiation probability in genealogies determined from single‐cell time‐lapse microscopy. In contrast to the branching process model, we found that the differentiation probability as determined by differentiation marker onset increases with the generation of the cell within the genealogy. To study this feature from a molecular perspective, we established a stochastic toggle switch model, in which the intrinsic lineage decision is executed using two antagonistic transcription factors. We identified parameter regimes that allow for both time‐dependent and time‐independent differentiation probabilities. Finally, we infer parameters for which the model matches experimentally observed differentiation probabilities via approximate Bayesian computing. These parameters suggest different timescales in the dynamics of granulocyte and monocyte differentiation. Thus we provide a multi‐scale picture of cell differentiation in murine GMPs, and illustrate the need for single‐cell time‐resolved observations of cellular decisions.

[1]  Kate Smith-Miles,et al.  Mathematical modelling of stem cell differentiation: the PU.1–GATA-1 interaction , 2012, Journal of mathematical biology.

[2]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Stability and multiattractor dynamics of a toggle switch based on a two-stage model of stochastic gene expression. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Hierarchical Differentiation of Myeloid Progenitors Is Encoded in the Transcription Factor Network , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Timm Schroeder,et al.  Multi-type branching models to describe cell differentiation programs. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Dynamic interaction networks in a hierarchically organized tissue , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[7]  Erika Cule,et al.  ABC-SysBio—approximate Bayesian computation in Python with GPU support , 2010, Bioinform..

[8]  E. Hawkins,et al.  The effect of correlations on the population dynamics of lymphocytes. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Hematopoiesis and its disorders: a systems biology approach. , 2010, Blood.

[10]  R. Dahl Development of Macrophages and Granulocytes , 2009 .

[11]  Visakan Kadirkamanathan,et al.  Modified variational Bayes EM estimation of hidden Markov tree model of cell lineages , 2009, Bioinform..

[12]  E. A. Sykes,et al.  Cell–cell interaction networks regulate blood stem and progenitor cell fate , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[13]  Philipp S. Hoppe,et al.  Hematopoietic Cytokines Can Instruct Lineage Choice , 2009, Science.

[14]  Pavol Bokes,et al.  A bistable genetic switch which does not require high co-operativity at the promoter: a two-timescale model for the PU.1-GATA-1 interaction. , 2009, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[15]  I. Nemenman,et al.  The simplicity of completion time distributions for common complex biochemical processes , 2009, Physical biology.

[16]  Shin-Ichi Nishikawa,et al.  Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Computational Modeling of the Hematopoietic Erythroid-Myeloid Switch Reveals Insights into Cooperativity, Priming, and Irreversibility , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  David Welch,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Vahid Shahrezaei,et al.  Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  B. Barzel,et al.  Calculation of switching times in the genetic toggle switch and other bistable systems. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Harinder Singh,et al.  Gene regulatory networks directing myeloid and lymphoid cell fates within the immune system. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[22]  L. Zon,et al.  Hematopoiesis: An Evolving Paradigm for Stem Cell Biology , 2008, Cell.

[23]  L. Zon,et al.  SnapShot: hematopoiesis. , 2008, Cell.

[24]  Michael Cross,et al.  Lineage Specification of Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Mathematical Modeling and Biological Implications , 2007, Stem cells.

[25]  Michael C. Mackey,et al.  Bifurcation and Bistability in a Model of Hematopoietic Regulation , 2007, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[26]  Sui Huang,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[27]  Ofer Biham,et al.  Stochastic simulations of genetic switch systems. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Designing sequential transcription logic: a simple genetic circuit for conditional memory , 2007, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[29]  P. Lásló,et al.  Multilineage Transcriptional Priming and Determination of Alternate Hematopoietic Cell Fates , 2006, Cell.

[30]  Ofer Biham,et al.  Genetic toggle switch without cooperative binding. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[31]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Absolute rate theories of epigenetic stability. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  K. Akashi,et al.  Distinctive and indispensable roles of PU.1 in maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells and their differentiation. , 2005, Blood.

[34]  Li Wu,et al.  PU.1 regulates the commitment of adult hematopoietic progenitors and restricts granulopoiesis , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[35]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Self-consistent proteomic field theory of stochastic gene switches. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[36]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Enhancement of the stability of genetic switches by overlapping upstream regulatory domains. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[37]  Peter W. Zandstra,et al.  Towards predictive models of stem cell fate , 2003, Cytotechnology.

[38]  Richard Dahl,et al.  Regulation of macrophage and neutrophil cell fates by the PU.1:C/EBPα ratio and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[39]  F R Adler,et al.  How to make a biological switch. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  William Bialek,et al.  Stability and Noise in Biochemical Switches , 2000, NIPS.

[41]  T. Graf,et al.  Insertion of enhanced green fluorescent protein into the lysozyme gene creates mice with green fluorescent granulocytes and macrophages. , 2000, Blood.

[42]  Elisa T. Lee,et al.  Survival analysis in public health research. , 1997, Annual review of public health.

[43]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[44]  M. Bjerknes A test of the stochastic theory of stem cell differentiation. , 1986, Biophysical journal.

[45]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[46]  J. Till,et al.  A STOCHASTIC MODEL OF STEM CELL PROLIFERATION, BASED ON THE GROWTH OF SPLEEN COLONY-FORMING CELLS. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  T. E. Harris,et al.  The Theory of Branching Processes. , 1963 .

[48]  W. J. Hamilton,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF EMBRYOLOGY , 1956 .

[49]  C. Waddington Principles of embryology / by C.H. Waddington. , 1956 .

[50]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .

[51]  F. Galton,et al.  On the Probability of the Extinction of Families , 1875 .