ADAPTABLE SIMULATION MODELS FOR MANUFACTURING

Discrete-event simulation is a powerful tool for solving many problems, especially in manufacturing. Formulating the problem, building the simulation model, running the model, and analyzing the output are the basic steps in a simulation study. Because building a simulation model can be a difficult and time-consuming task, it will be useful if a decision-maker could reuse a simulation model if possible and change it to solve a different problem or evaluate another option. Thus, it is desirable to have adaptable simulation models that are easy to change with little or no programming effort. Using simulation models in real-time scheduling and operational settings also requires adaptable simulation models that can represent the changing shop floor. Also, as a manufacturing system progresses from a concept to a detailed design, and to an installed and operating facility, the simulation model of the system must change. Adaptable simulation models will reduce the time, effort, and cost of using simulation in these types of scenarios. This paper reviews the concepts of adaptability, suggests some measures for adaptable simulation models, and discusses factors that affect adaptability.

[1]  R. D. Smet Simulation modeling and analysis (2nd edition): Averill M. Law and W. David Kelton McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1991, xxii + 759 pages, £31.05, ISBN 0 07 036698 5 , 1993 .

[2]  Catherine M. Harmonosky Simulation-based real-time scheduling: review of recent developments , 1995, WSC '95.

[3]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[4]  Thomas R. Gulledge,et al.  Returns-to-Scale in Software Production: A Comparison of Approaches , 1993 .

[5]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  A library of reusable model components for visual simulation of the NCSTRL system , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[6]  Gerald T. Mackulak,et al.  Effective simulation model reuse: a case study for AMHS modeling , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[7]  Jay Lee Teleservice engineering in manufacturing: challenges and opportunities , 1998 .

[8]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Making simulation more accessible in manufacturing systems through a 'four phase' approach , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[9]  Karl Lieberherr,et al.  Adaptive Object-Oriented Software: The Demeter Method with Propagation Patterns , 1995 .

[10]  Wim Codenie,et al.  From custom applications to domain-specific frameworks , 1997, CACM.

[11]  Mike Gregory,et al.  International manufacturing networks—to develop global competitive capabilities , 1998 .

[12]  T. Capers Jones Reusability in Programming: A Survey of the State of the Art , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[13]  J. Banks,et al.  Handbook of Simulation , 1998 .