Perceptual normalization of the vowels of a man and a child in various contexts

Abstract The topic of this study is speaker normalization. Both a man and a child rapidly produced the Dutch sentences “Matroos p V t kaas” (“Sailor p V t eats cheese”): the man imitated the child's pitch. The test words p V t were presented to listeners in their original carrier sentence, in isolation, and in the other talker's carrier sentence. Especially in the latter condition considerably more vowel confusions occurred. It is argued that listeners match unknown vowels with template vowels of “average” men, women or children: the appropriate template is chosen on the basis of pitch and timbre of the unknown vowels. The vowel confusions in the present experiment can thus be explained by a confusion of templates. This explanation accounts better for the test results than the one suggested by Joos (1948) and others, that the acoustic context provides information about the formant frequencies of the talker's vowels with which a vowel space can be constructed that serves as a reference frame for the identification of the vowels in the test words.

[1]  Reinier Plomp,et al.  Aspects of tone sensation : a psychophysical study , 1976 .

[2]  B. Lobanov Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers , 1971 .

[3]  R. Plomp,et al.  Perceptual and physical space of vowel sounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  L. F. Willems,et al.  Measurement of pitch in speech: an implementation of Goldstein's theory of pitch perception. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Perceptual analysis from confusions between vowels , 1971 .

[6]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-model factor analysis , 1970 .

[7]  S. F. Disner Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W. Ainsworth The Influence of Precursive Sequences on the Perception of Synthesized Vowels , 1974, Language and speech.

[9]  Ann K. Syrdal,et al.  Aspects of a model of the auditory representation of american english vowels , 1985, Speech Commun..

[10]  W. Klein,et al.  Vowel spectra, vowel spaces, and vowel identification. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. T. Hogan,et al.  Vowel identification: orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  T. M. Nearey Phonetic feature systems for vowels , 1978 .

[13]  C. G. Henton,et al.  Towards an auditory theory of speaker normalization , 1984 .

[14]  H. Fujisaki,et al.  The roles of pitch and higher formants in the perception of vowels , 1968 .

[15]  R. Miller Auditory Tests with Synthetic Vowels , 1951 .

[16]  D. A. Wilkins Linguistics in language teaching , 1972 .

[17]  James J. Jenkins,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels , 1983 .

[18]  A. Slawson Vowel quality and musical timbre as functions of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[20]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  What information enables a listener to map a talker's vowel space? , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[22]  H Hollien,et al.  Some Contextual Effects on the Perception of Synthetic Vowels , 1970, Language and speech.

[23]  Winifred Strange,et al.  Consonant environment specifies vowel identity. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  John E. Markel,et al.  Linear Prediction of Speech , 1976, Communication and Cybernetics.

[25]  B H Repp,et al.  Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Pierre Delattre,et al.  An Acoustic and Articulatory Study of Vowel Reduction in Four Languages. , 1969 .

[27]  L. Gerstman Classification of self-normalized vowels , 1968 .

[28]  R. Plomp,et al.  Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels from 50 male speakers. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  B. Lindblom Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .

[30]  W Strange,et al.  Perceptual constancy of vowels in rapid speech. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  B H Repp,et al.  Measuring laterality effects in dichotic listening. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  M. Macchi,et al.  Identification of vowels spoken in isolation versus vowels spoken in consonantal context. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.