Resilience analysis of networked systems-of-systems based on structural and dynamic interdependencies

Critical infrastructures support everyday activities in modern societies, facilitating the exchange of services and quantities of various nature. Their functioning is the result of the integration of diverse technologies, systems and organizations into a complex network of interconnections. Benefits from networking are accompanied by new threats and risks. In particular, because of the increased interdependency, disturbances and failures may propagate and render unstable the whole infrastructure network. This paper presents a methodology of resilience analysis of networked systems of systems. Resilience generalizes the concept of stability of a system around a state of equilibrium, with respect to a disturbance and its ability of preventing, resisting and recovery. The methodology provides a tool for the analysis of off-equilibrium conditions that may occur in a single system and propagate through the network of dependencies. The analysis is conducted in two stages. The first stage of the analysis is qualitative. It identifies the resilience scenarios, i.e. the sequence of events, triggered by an initial disturbance, which include failures and the system response. The second stage is quantitative. The most critical scenarios can be simulated, for the desired parameter settings, in order to check if they are successfully handled, i.e recovered to nominal conditions, or they end into the network failure. The proposed methodology aims at providing an effective support to resilience-informed design.

[1]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[2]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[3]  Charles Perrow,et al.  Normal accidents : living with high-risk technologies : with a new afterword and a postscript on the Y2K problem , 2011 .

[4]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[5]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[6]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[7]  M. Egan Anticipating Future Vulnerability: Defining Characteristics of Increasingly Critical Infrastructure-Like Systems , 2007 .

[8]  Wolfgang Kröger,et al.  Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Stefano Panzieri,et al.  Failures propagation in critical interdependent infrastructures , 2008, Int. J. Model. Identif. Control..

[10]  Andres Sousa-Poza,et al.  System of systems engineering: an emerging multidiscipline , 2008, Int. J. Syst. Syst. Eng..

[11]  Mohammad Jamshidi,et al.  System of systems engineering : innovations for the 21st century , 2008 .

[12]  Scott Jackson,et al.  Architecting Resilient Systems , 2009 .

[13]  Fei Xue,et al.  Analysis of structural vulnerabilities in power transmission grids , 2009, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[14]  David Hutchison,et al.  Resilience and survivability in communication networks: Strategies, principles, and survey of disciplines , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Andrés Silva,et al.  Infrastructure (Resilience-oriented) Modelling Language: I®ML , 2011 .

[16]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Vulnerable Systems , 2011 .

[17]  C. Perrow Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies - Updated Edition , 2011 .

[18]  Irene Eusgeld,et al.  Adopting HLA standard for interdependency study , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..